DYB2011-Part-II-web
DYB2011-Part-II-web
DYB2011-Part-II-web
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
United Nations Disarmament Yearbook 2011: <strong>Part</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />
298<br />
66/23. African Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty<br />
By this annual resolution, the General<br />
Assembly recalled with satisfaction the<br />
entry into force of the African Nuclear-<br />
Weapon-Free Zone Treaty (Pelindaba Treaty)<br />
in 2009 and called upon African States that<br />
had not yet done so to sign and ratify it as<br />
soon as possible.<br />
First Committee. After joining the<br />
consensus on the draft resolution, India<br />
stated that it respected the sovereign choice of non-nuclear-weapon States to establish<br />
nuclear-weapon-free zones on the basis of arrangements freely arrived at among the<br />
States of the region concerned. India conveyed its unambiguous assurance that it<br />
would respect the status of the African nuclear-weapon-free zone.<br />
Spain, which had also joined the consensus, said that the entry into force of<br />
the Treaty of Pelindaba was an important contribution to strengthening international<br />
peace and security. Spain expressed its support for the Treaty’s aims, adding that it<br />
was prepared to help the States parties acquire sufficient capacities for its effective<br />
implementation in their respective territories. After studying the invitation to become<br />
party to Protocol <strong>II</strong>I of the Treaty, Spain decided not to sign the Treaty. The Treaty<br />
of Pelindaba did not contain disarmament and non-proliferation provisions that Spain<br />
had not already adopted with respect to Spanish territory. Spain had been militarily<br />
nuclear-free since 1976 and had therefore taken all the steps required to enable the<br />
Treaty to be fully implemented throughout its national territory.<br />
Although Spain had joined the consensus on the draft resolution, it did not<br />
support that consensus on paragraph 4 of the draft resolution. It called on the sponsors<br />
to hold transparent consultations in good faith to arrive at more balanced language,<br />
especially with respect to that particular paragraph.<br />
66/25. Establishment of a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the<br />
region of the Middle East<br />
In this annual resolution, the General<br />
Assembly once again called upon all countries of<br />
the region that had not yet done so, pending the<br />
establishment of the zone, to agree to place all<br />
their nuclear activities under International Atomic<br />
Energy Agency safeguards. It also requested<br />
the Secretary-General to continue to pursue<br />
consultations with the States of the region and<br />
Introduced by: Nigeria, on behalf of the<br />
States Members of the United Nations that are<br />
members of the Group of African States (14 Oct.)<br />
GA vote: w/o vote (2 Dec.)<br />
1st Cttee vote: w/o vote (27 Oct.)<br />
For text and sponsors, see Yearbook,<br />
<strong>Part</strong> I, pp. 12-13.<br />
Introduced by: Egypt (24 Oct.)<br />
GA vote: w/o vote (2 Dec.)<br />
1st Cttee vote: w/o vote (26 Oct.)<br />
For text and sponsors, see Yearbook,<br />
<strong>Part</strong> I, pp. 18-21.<br />
other concerned States and to seek their views on the measures outlined in the study<br />
annexed to his report of 10 October 1990 or other relevant measures.<br />
First Committee. Israel stated that it joined the consensus on the draft<br />
resolution, notwithstanding its ongoing substantive reservations. It remained<br />
committed to a Middle East free of chemical, biological and nuclear weapons, as<br />
well as ballistic missiles. Such a vision could be addressed only within the regional<br />
context, based on the free will of States of the region. The essential preconditions for