04.04.2013 Views

DYB2011-Part-II-web

DYB2011-Part-II-web

DYB2011-Part-II-web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Related issues, including information and outreach<br />

Nigeria, on behalf of the African Group, aligned itself with the statement<br />

of the NAM. It called for the total elimination of nuclear weapons in a<br />

transparent, verifiable and irreversible manner and advocated unconditional<br />

negative security assurances in a legally binding instrument. Nigeria also<br />

called for the early entry into force of the CTBT, the ratification of the<br />

Pelindaba Treaty protocols38 by all the nuclear Powers and more effective<br />

implementation of the United Nations Programme of Action on the illicit trade<br />

in small arms and light weapons.<br />

Brazil maintained that the nuclear deterrence concept, created during<br />

the cold war, had lost its strategic significance and was no longer crucial for<br />

military purposes and that the time was ripe to begin negotiations to eliminate<br />

nuclear weapons. Until such time, it advocated negative security assurances<br />

to non-nuclear-weapon States. It also supported negotiations for a verifiable<br />

FMCT. Brazil wanted the proposed declaration of the fourth disarmament<br />

decade to include the holding of a fourth special session on disarmament and<br />

also relevant issues in the field of conventional weapons, including practical<br />

confidence-building measures.<br />

Pakistan, aligning itself with the NAM, expressed concern over the<br />

widening gap between the major Powers and smaller States resulting from the<br />

development of anti-ballistic missile systems, militarization of outer space,<br />

build-up of conventional forces by the major Powers, and the erosion of<br />

nuclear security assurances for non-nuclear-weapon States. It also maintained<br />

that no State could be expected to engage in disarmament, arms control or<br />

non-proliferation negotiations if those negotiations undermined its core<br />

security interests.<br />

Report of the Commission (A/66/42)<br />

At its organizational session held on 28 March, the UNDC adopted the<br />

agenda39 for its 2011 substantive session, and in accordance with that decision,<br />

it established three working groups to carry out its substantive work.<br />

Working Group I was given the mandate to deal with agenda item<br />

4 entitled “Recommendations for achieving the objective of nuclear<br />

disarmament and non-proliferation of nuclear weapons”. It was chaired by<br />

Knut Langeland (Norway) and held seven meetings from 7 to 14 April.<br />

The Commission entrusted Working Group <strong>II</strong> with the task of dealing<br />

with agenda item 5 entitled “Elements of a draft declaration of the 2010s as<br />

the fourth disarmament decade”. It was chaired by Kayode Laro (Nigeria) and<br />

seven meetings were held, on 6 April and from 8 to 14 April.<br />

Working Group <strong>II</strong>I was allocated agenda item 6 entitled “Practical<br />

confidence-building measures in the field of conventional weapons”. It was<br />

38 Ibid.<br />

39 A/CN.10/L.65.<br />

167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!