04.04.2013 Views

DYB2011-Part-II-web

DYB2011-Part-II-web

DYB2011-Part-II-web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Biological and chemical weapons<br />

During the meeting, participants worked to enhance best practices and<br />

measures to detect and prevent attempts to proliferate sensitive and dual-use<br />

chemicals, biological materials and related equipment. The Group shared<br />

experience on measures to enhance and refine licensing and export controls in<br />

order to meet current and emerging proliferation challenges.<br />

The Group adopted a number of changes to its chemical and biological<br />

control lists, which were to be reflected in subsequent versions of the<br />

published lists. It also continued its review process of the proliferation risk<br />

associated with new and emerging technologies, with a view to identifying<br />

materials and equipment that might warrant inclusion at some future date in<br />

national export control lists.<br />

Recognizing that preventing unauthorized transfers of intangible<br />

technology remains a priority for preventing the further proliferation of all<br />

forms of weapons of mass destruction, the Group reviewed steps being<br />

taken by several States to enhance such measures. As an additional practical<br />

contribution, the Australia Group approved a new manual, 50 for use by the<br />

Group’s participants in dealing with intangible transfers of technology.<br />

The Group emphasized the ongoing importance of engaging industry<br />

and academic sectors in support of the Group’s work, including in controlling<br />

security-sensitive transfers of intangible technology. It noted the benefits<br />

to industry of such outreach in facilitating legitimate trade. The Group also<br />

shared experiences and best practices for such outreach activities.<br />

The Australia Group plenary noted that its control lists continued to be<br />

an international benchmark for best practice controls on dual use, chemical<br />

and biological materials, equipment and related intangible technology. The<br />

plenary agreed to continue its extensive engagements with non-members and<br />

other international organizations in 2011-2012, with a view to the wider global<br />

adoption of the lists as they evolve over time.<br />

No new members were admitted to the Group in 2011. Nonetheless,<br />

several countries received appropriate attention with regard to their interest in<br />

membership. The plenary approved further engagement with these States.<br />

50 The publication was made possible through the support of the Republic of Korea.<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!