04.04.2013 Views

DYB2011-Part-II-web

DYB2011-Part-II-web

DYB2011-Part-II-web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

United Nations Disarmament Yearbook 2011: <strong>Part</strong> <strong>II</strong><br />

288<br />

security situation in the Middle East, including adherence to and compliance<br />

with the Treaty by States in the region, was a major consideration for ratification,<br />

as well as the completion of the verification regime.<br />

The Syrian Arab Republic abstained from the voting on the draft resolution on<br />

the CTBT, maintaining that such an important treaty must not ignore the legitimate<br />

concerns of non-nuclear-weapon States, which had not been offered sufficient<br />

guarantees against the use or threat of use of nuclear weapons, nor had access to<br />

peaceful nuclear technology. The Treaty text did not entail a commitment on the part<br />

of nuclear-weapon States to eliminate their nuclear arsenals within a reasonable period<br />

of time, and was confined to banning nuclear explosions without addressing new types<br />

of weapons. The Syrian Arab Republic also stressed that inspection measures could<br />

lead to abuses in national data monitoring or control, possibly for political purposes.<br />

It considered it strange that the Treaty authorized signatory States to take measures<br />

against non-signatory States, which was tantamount to a violation of State sovereignty.<br />

Citing Israel’s possession and development of nuclear weapons and other weapons of<br />

mass destruction and its refusal to accede to the NPT or to submit its nuclear facilities<br />

to IAEA verification, it believed that efforts at creating a nuclear-weapon-free zone in<br />

the Middle East were hampered. It expressed reservations with regard to all paragraphs<br />

of all draft resolutions on the CTBT that had been adopted to date, and those to<br />

be adopted.<br />

66/516. Missiles (decision)<br />

The General Assembly, recalling its<br />

past resolutions and decisions on the subject,<br />

decided to include in the provisional agenda<br />

of its sixty-seventh session the item entitled<br />

“Missiles”.<br />

Chapter <strong>II</strong>. Biological and chemical weapons<br />

66/21. Prohibition of the development and manufacture of new<br />

types of weapons of mass destruction and new systems of such<br />

weapons: report of the Conference on Disarmament<br />

This resolution was last introduced<br />

in 2008. The General Assembly requested<br />

the Conference on Disarmament to keep the<br />

matter under review with a view to making<br />

recommendations on undertaking specific<br />

negotiations on identified types of such<br />

weapons, when necessary. It also called upon<br />

Introduced by: Islamic Republic of Iran (17 Oct.)<br />

GA vote: w/o vote (2 Dec.)<br />

1st Cttee vote: w/o vote (26 Oct.)<br />

For text and sponsors, see Yearbook, <strong>Part</strong> I, p. 200.<br />

Introduced by: Belarus (17 Oct.)<br />

GA vote: 168-1-1 (2 Dec.)<br />

1st Cttee vote: 173-1-1 (27 Oct.)<br />

For text, sponsors and voting pattern, see<br />

Yearbook, <strong>Part</strong> I, pp. 6-8.<br />

all States to give favourable consideration to those recommendations, requested the<br />

Conference to report the results of any consideration of the matter in its annual reports<br />

to the General Assembly, and decided to include this item in the provisional agenda of<br />

its sixty-ninth session.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!