04.04.2013 Views

DYB2011-Part-II-web

DYB2011-Part-II-web

DYB2011-Part-II-web

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation<br />

participating Governments79 took stock of developments since the last meeting<br />

in 2010, expressing their sorrow at the devastation caused by earthquakes in<br />

New Zealand and Japan. The Group noted the need to address proliferation<br />

concerns without hampering legitimate trade, reaffirmed the importance of<br />

licensing and enforcement based on NSG guidelines and control lists, and<br />

reiterated its support for diplomatic efforts and peaceful solutions to the<br />

nuclear issues related to the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Democratic<br />

People’s Republic of Korea.<br />

The primary outcome of the meeting was agreement on new guidelines<br />

pertaining to the transfer of sensitive enrichment and reprocessing<br />

technologies. Whereas the previous guidelines required the Group only to<br />

“exercise restraint” in exporting enrichment and reprocessing technology,<br />

the new guidelines reportedly also include a list of “objective criteria” for<br />

States to be eligible to receive such transfers. Under these criteria, a recipient<br />

must have brought into force a comprehensive safeguards agreement together<br />

with an additional protocol or, pending such a step, the implementation of<br />

appropriate safeguards agreements in cooperation with the Agency, including<br />

a regional accounting and control arrangement for nuclear materials, as<br />

approved by the IAEA Board of Governors.<br />

At issue during the negotiation was the effect of the new rules of the<br />

NSG waiver to India, granted in 2008. The new guidelines seemingly would<br />

have no implications for future nuclear cooperation between NSG members<br />

and India, as both the old and new guidelines would effectively preclude the<br />

transfer of sensitive enrichment and reprocessing technologies to India.<br />

In addition to reaching agreement on the revised guidelines, the NSG<br />

also exchanged views on various topical matters. NSG members emphasized<br />

the importance of keeping the Group’s lists up to date with technological<br />

developments. The Group continued to discuss its relationship with India. It<br />

also discussed brokering and transit issues and agreed to consider options for<br />

how to best reflect these matters in its guidelines. The Group also reviewed<br />

the status of adherence to the Additional Protocol.<br />

79 As of 31 December 2011, the NSG had 46 participating Governments: Argentina,<br />

Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Croatia, Cyprus,<br />

Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland,<br />

Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands,<br />

New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Romania, Russian<br />

Federation, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey,<br />

Ukraine, United Kingdom and United States. The European Commission is a permanent<br />

observer.<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!