01.05.2013 Views

Food-Service-Manual-for-Health-Care-Institutions

Food-Service-Manual-for-Health-Care-Institutions

Food-Service-Manual-for-Health-Care-Institutions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Move to CQI in <strong>Health</strong> <strong>Care</strong><br />

The term continuous quality improvement, or CQI, has been selected by many to identify their<br />

quality initiatives. For the purposes of this text, CQI is defined as “the base theory that quality<br />

can be improved on a continuous, or never-ending basis,” a definition taken from An<br />

Executive’s Pocket Guide to QI/TQM Terminology. The concept of CQI is based on the principle<br />

that poor quality is the result of poorly functioning or poorly structured processes that<br />

can be improved.<br />

The person credited with moving CQI from the manufacturing arena to health care is<br />

Donald Berwick, who was trained as a physician. Berwick was codesigner of the National<br />

Demonstration Project on Quality Improvement in <strong>Health</strong>care, which was designed using the<br />

TQM approach. The project was led by the Harvard Community <strong>Health</strong> Plan in Boston in the<br />

late 1980s and ended in 1991. The demonstration project included twenty-one health care<br />

organizations, many of which have become leaders in TQM. This demonstration project has<br />

been credited with beginning the shift that brought more than 60 percent of the health care<br />

organizations in this country to CQI.<br />

The CQI concept was first introduced in the JCAHO Accreditation <strong>Manual</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Health</strong>care<br />

in 1992. The JCAHO’s position is that 95 percent of an organization’s problems can be solved<br />

through process improvement, and the JCAHO encouraged all hospitals to have some type of<br />

CQI process in place. The remaining 5 percent of problems should be handled through traditional<br />

quality assessment and peer review.<br />

The JCAHO had renamed the “Quality Assessment and Improvement” chapter as<br />

“Organizational Per<strong>for</strong>mance Improvement.” Representatives <strong>for</strong> the JCAHO advise hospitals<br />

to learn the concepts of CQI without abandoning traditional monitoring and evaluation of<br />

quality assurance. This advice means that traditional quality assurance will continue to play a<br />

major role in accreditation standards with the JCAHO.<br />

The JCAHO concedes that many different approaches lead to CQI and that it endorses no<br />

one method. However, elements of CQI have been incorporated into the standards <strong>for</strong> accreditation<br />

as follows:<br />

• The key role that leaders (individually and collectively) play in enabling the assessment<br />

and improvement of per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

• The fact that most problems or opportunities <strong>for</strong> improvement derive from process<br />

weaknesses, not from individual incompetence<br />

• The need <strong>for</strong> careful coordination of work across departments and professional groups<br />

• The importance of seeking judgments about quality from patients and other “customers”<br />

and using such judgments to identify areas <strong>for</strong> improvement<br />

• The importance of carefully setting priorities <strong>for</strong> improvement<br />

• The need <strong>for</strong> both systematic improvement of the per<strong>for</strong>mance of important functions<br />

and maintenance of the stability of these functions<br />

Another standard addresses the education of health care executives about quality improvement.<br />

The standard requires facilities to demonstrate that the executive team has acquired education<br />

in the approaches and methods of quality improvement. A plan must be in place to<br />

demonstrate how the organization will meet quality improvement standards <strong>for</strong><br />

• Setting priorities <strong>for</strong> quality improvement activities<br />

• Allocating resources <strong>for</strong> improvement activities<br />

• Training staff members regarding quality improvement<br />

• Fostering better communication and coordination of quality improvement activities<br />

• Determining how the effectiveness of their contributions to quality improvement is<br />

analyzed<br />

Quality Management<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!