01.05.2013 Views

Food-Service-Manual-for-Health-Care-Institutions

Food-Service-Manual-for-Health-Care-Institutions

Food-Service-Manual-for-Health-Care-Institutions

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Step 4: Establish procedures to monitor CCPs<br />

<strong>Food</strong> Safety, Sanitation, and Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points<br />

Monitoring is a planned sequence of observation or measurement to assess whether a CCP is<br />

under control and to produce an accurate record <strong>for</strong> use in the future verification procedures.<br />

The main purpose of monitoring is<br />

• To track the operation, to monitor any trend and correct any action, and to bring the<br />

process back into control<br />

• To determine if a deviation has occurred and to take corrective action<br />

• To provide written documentation <strong>for</strong> verification of the plan<br />

A flowchart should be developed <strong>for</strong> recipe group CCPs. The flowchart can be used to check<br />

all steps to be observed and measured. A loss of control or deviation that has actually occurred<br />

should be documented. Flowcharts can also be developed <strong>for</strong> the methods used <strong>for</strong> cooking, such<br />

as roasting, baking, frying, and so <strong>for</strong>th. At this step, temperature monitoring is critical. Other key<br />

areas to monitor are time, pH level, employee per<strong>for</strong>mance, records, and documentation. Preventive<br />

measures include personal hygiene (especially hand washing), separating raw and cooked products<br />

(Cross-contamination), and methods <strong>for</strong> cleaning and sanitizing the environment and equipment.<br />

The monitoring procedures track the system or process of operation. The monitoring indicates<br />

when the loss of control and deviation have actually occurred. Exhibit 13.2 is an example<br />

that can be used to monitor CCPs <strong>for</strong> employee behavior, equipment, food, hot holding,<br />

and transporting. The supervisor would fill out this <strong>for</strong>m and initial, noting any needed correction<br />

and what measures were taken to correct any problem. This <strong>for</strong>m is verification of documentation.<br />

The <strong>for</strong>m should reside with the product throughout the process and then be filed<br />

<strong>for</strong> a specified period of time.<br />

The written documentation is provided. When establishing the monitoring procedures, the<br />

team must establish the interval of the monitoring. <strong>Care</strong> should be taken to do the monitoring<br />

rapidly with an assignment of responsibility.<br />

Continuous monitoring is preferred when feasible. However, continuous monitoring is not<br />

always feasible due to cost, lack of labor, and the like. The team should establish a monitoring<br />

interval that is reliable enough to indicate that the hazard is under control. The food service<br />

manager should assign responsibility <strong>for</strong> monitoring, train staff, and do random sampling.<br />

Step 5: Establish the corrective action to be taken when monitoring shows that a critical<br />

limit had been exceeded<br />

Each area in the food production process must be examined <strong>for</strong> deficiencies. The workplace is<br />

to be reviewed, monitored, and analyzed through food safety audits, environmental monitoring,<br />

and self-inspections to identify CCPs that could lead to a food-borne illness. The first step<br />

is to determine what went wrong, and then appropriate action should be chosen and applied.<br />

A continuous review of the flowcharts, recipes, and procedure manuals will indicate steps <strong>for</strong><br />

correction. As the corrections are identified, they should be added to the appropriate documents.<br />

All control points should be reviewed from source to serving. A corrective action plan <strong>for</strong><br />

each CCP is then developed. The CCP should be shown to be brought under control as documented<br />

in the HACCP plan. The responsible person should check <strong>for</strong> breaks in employee<br />

health policies, cross-contamination, temperature controls, thawing, cooling, and reheating.<br />

Whether food should be discarded should be determined. If appropriate, an outside laboratory<br />

can be used to test <strong>for</strong> microorganisms. Methods should be devised that can be implemented<br />

to immediately correct the problem.<br />

<strong>Food</strong> service professionals must demonstrate that the problem is under control. An<br />

account of steps taken and follow-up must be documented. The corrections are added to the<br />

flowcharts, procedures, and manuals.<br />

The most important task is to communicate the change(s) to employees. The training<br />

process is ongoing with an HACCP program. Employees must be encouraged to bring hazardous<br />

food operating conditions to the supervisor or manager’s attention <strong>for</strong> correction.<br />

409

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!