01.06.2013 Views

The Boot and Shoe Trades in London and Paris in the Long Eighteenth Century

The Boot and Shoe Trades in London and Paris in the Long Eighteenth Century

The Boot and Shoe Trades in London and Paris in the Long Eighteenth Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>in</strong>side <strong>the</strong> family bus<strong>in</strong>ess.' 17 Women were rarely found runn<strong>in</strong>g a shoemak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess on <strong>the</strong>ir own; Leonard Schwarz's study of <strong>in</strong>surance registers <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>London</strong> for 1775-87 shows that of a total of 529 shoemakers only n<strong>in</strong>e (1.7 per<br />

cent) were women. 118 Only 12 women entered <strong>the</strong> company dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> period<br />

1690-1860, six of whom were daughters of cordwa<strong>in</strong>ers." 9 <strong>The</strong> lack of female<br />

master cordwa<strong>in</strong>ers was matched by <strong>the</strong> absence of female apprentices <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

trade. At <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> eighteenth century only 2 or 3 per cent of<br />

apprentices were women. 120 This percentage fell to 1 per cent after 1710, <strong>and</strong><br />

women completely disappeared from <strong>the</strong> registers after 1760. <strong>The</strong> Register of<br />

Apprentice B<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs entries show that women (<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case <strong>the</strong>y were not<br />

cordwa<strong>in</strong>ers' daughters) normally came from outside <strong>London</strong> <strong>and</strong> had humble<br />

orig<strong>in</strong>s. <strong>The</strong> two sisters, Mary <strong>and</strong> Wilhelm<strong>in</strong>a Vernal!, daughters of a yeoman<br />

<strong>in</strong> Hertfordshire, for example, were bound apprentices to Mary Newark <strong>in</strong><br />

1710.121 More common was <strong>the</strong> case of young girls apprenticed by a male<br />

master as was Mary Richardson, <strong>the</strong> daughter of a Nott<strong>in</strong>gham stock<strong>in</strong>g weaver,<br />

bound apprentice <strong>in</strong> 1739.122<br />

<strong>The</strong> overall impression such figures give is of a decl<strong>in</strong>e of <strong>the</strong> importance of<br />

women <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> occupation. This was not a new phenomenon, hav<strong>in</strong>g probably<br />

started <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> medieval period.' 23 However, do such statistics reveal a decrease<br />

of women's participation <strong>in</strong> boot <strong>and</strong> shoe production? Recent research on<br />

women's roles has suggested that women made an important contribution to <strong>the</strong><br />

workforce <strong>in</strong> eighteenth-century Brita<strong>in</strong>.' 24 <strong>The</strong>re seems to be a dichotomy<br />

between <strong>the</strong> dynamic role of women <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> proto-<strong>in</strong>dustrial, household<br />

economy, as highlighted <strong>in</strong> de Vries concept of <strong>the</strong> '<strong>in</strong>dustrious revolution', <strong>and</strong><br />

" In 1690, out of 1590 new freemen of <strong>the</strong> City of <strong>London</strong> only twelve were women. D.V.<br />

Glass, "Socio-economic status <strong>and</strong> occupation <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> City of <strong>London</strong>", <strong>in</strong> A.E. Holle<strong>and</strong>er <strong>and</strong><br />

W. Kellaway (ed.), Studies <strong>in</strong> <strong>London</strong> History, cit., pp. 385-6.<br />

' 18 LD Schwarz, <strong>London</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> age of <strong>in</strong>dustrialisation, cit., p. 21.<br />

" 9 GL, MS 24139: Worshipful Company of Cordwa<strong>in</strong>ers, cit.<br />

120<br />

P. Earle, '<strong>The</strong> female labour market <strong>in</strong> <strong>London</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> late seventeenth <strong>and</strong> eighteenth<br />

centuries', Economic History Review, XLII - 3 (1989), pp. 328-53; I.K. Ben-Amos, 'Women<br />

apprentices <strong>in</strong> trades <strong>and</strong> crafts of early modern Bristol', Cont<strong>in</strong>uity <strong>and</strong> Change, VI - 2 (1991),<br />

p. 228.<br />

121 GL, MS 24,140: Worshipful Company of Cordwa<strong>in</strong>ers, cit. (1710)<br />

122 J,jj (1739)<br />

' 23 MC Howell, Women, production <strong>and</strong> patriarchy, cit., pp. 27-32.<br />

P. Sharpe, ed., Women's work: <strong>the</strong> English experience, 1650-1914 (<strong>London</strong>, 1998).<br />

86

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!