01.06.2013 Views

The Boot and Shoe Trades in London and Paris in the Long Eighteenth Century

The Boot and Shoe Trades in London and Paris in the Long Eighteenth Century

The Boot and Shoe Trades in London and Paris in the Long Eighteenth Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> 1812 <strong>London</strong> shoemakers' strike can be considered as <strong>the</strong> turn<strong>in</strong>g po<strong>in</strong>t<br />

of consolidated practices. A twelve-week strike led <strong>London</strong> shoe retailers to<br />

depend completely on Northampton production. It confirmed what was<br />

becom<strong>in</strong>g obvious, that is to say <strong>the</strong> strength of Northampton as a shoemak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

centre. <strong>The</strong> Napoleonic wars had multiplied shoe production <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial<br />

town <strong>and</strong> many shoemakers were now confident of be<strong>in</strong>g able to reach <strong>the</strong><br />

metropolitan market without depend<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>London</strong> wholesale dealers <strong>and</strong><br />

retailers. <strong>The</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> Napoleonic wars <strong>and</strong> a sudden restriction <strong>in</strong> shoe<br />

dem<strong>and</strong>, imposed a more active action from Northampton producers. In <strong>the</strong> logic<br />

of dependence on <strong>the</strong> <strong>London</strong> shoe market, Northampton was hit by a dem<strong>and</strong><br />

crisis more than <strong>the</strong> metropolis itself. Many producers saw that <strong>the</strong> only solution<br />

to survive <strong>the</strong> crisis was to approach directly <strong>the</strong> metropolitan market.<br />

An early example of a new k<strong>in</strong>d of local entrepreneurship can be seen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Ketter<strong>in</strong>g shoe manufacturer Thomas Gotch who, by profession a banker,<br />

entered <strong>the</strong> army shoe trade as a manufacturer <strong>in</strong> 1778.84 Even more important <strong>in</strong><br />

underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial penetration is <strong>the</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g up of a Northamptonshire<br />

shoe depot <strong>in</strong> <strong>London</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1812.85 A group of Northamptonshire shoe<br />

manufacturers associated <strong>in</strong> order to establish a sell<strong>in</strong>g agency <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> capital.<br />

This association was short lived because of <strong>in</strong>ternal problems <strong>and</strong> ended up as a<br />

private bus<strong>in</strong>ess run by a certa<strong>in</strong> William Hickson, a Northampton bootmaker<br />

previously appo<strong>in</strong>ted as director of <strong>the</strong> depot <strong>and</strong> who had an extensive<br />

knowledge of <strong>the</strong> <strong>London</strong> market be<strong>in</strong>g one of George Hoby's former<br />

apprentices. 86 A few years later, <strong>in</strong> 1818, a second depot was set up at 33<br />

We f<strong>in</strong>d, for <strong>in</strong>stance, that Thomas Gotch was <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> creditor of Samuel Wood, a boot <strong>and</strong><br />

shoemaker <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Str<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>London</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> early 1831. Wood owned to Gotch more than £400.<br />

PRO B 3/5779: 'Bankruptcy of Samuel Wood, boot <strong>and</strong> shoemaker <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Str<strong>and</strong>, <strong>London</strong>' (22ld<br />

November 1831). On Gotch see also R.A. Church, 'Gotch & Sons, Ketter<strong>in</strong>g, tanners, curriers,<br />

boot <strong>and</strong> shoe makers, 1797-1888', Journal of <strong>Boot</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Shoe</strong> Institutions, VII - 11(1957), pp.<br />

479-88 <strong>and</strong> part H <strong>in</strong> ibid., VII - 12 (1957), pp. 506-12; R.A. Church, 'Messrs Gotch & Sons <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> rise of <strong>the</strong> Ketter<strong>in</strong>g footwear <strong>in</strong>dustry', Bus<strong>in</strong>ess History, Vifi - 2 (1966), pp. 140-9; P.<br />

Mounfield, '<strong>The</strong> footwear <strong>in</strong>dustry of <strong>the</strong> East Midl<strong>and</strong>s IV: Leicestershire till 1911', East<br />

Midl<strong>and</strong>s Geographer, IV - 1, no. 25 (1966), pp. 8-23; R.L. Greenhall, '<strong>The</strong> rise of <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />

Ketter<strong>in</strong>g', Northamptonshire Past <strong>and</strong> Present, V —3 (1975), pp. 253-66.<br />

85 Victoria County History: Northampton, cit., vol. ii, pp. 324-5.<br />

86 Parliamentary Papers (1812), micro 14.23, cit., pp. 652-3.<br />

235

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!