01.06.2013 Views

The Boot and Shoe Trades in London and Paris in the Long Eighteenth Century

The Boot and Shoe Trades in London and Paris in the Long Eighteenth Century

The Boot and Shoe Trades in London and Paris in the Long Eighteenth Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

French producers were <strong>the</strong>refore very "concerned not only with <strong>the</strong> actual<br />

process of production <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y engaged, but also with <strong>the</strong> quality <strong>and</strong><br />

value of <strong>the</strong> products <strong>the</strong>y produced". 72 In Brita<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>stead shoemakers decided<br />

to compete on prices ra<strong>the</strong>r than on quality. <strong>The</strong> result had been a general<br />

decrease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> productive st<strong>and</strong>ards of British shoemakers. As a shoemaker of<br />

Doncaster sadly reported <strong>in</strong> 1830, <strong>the</strong> public was aware that "it is too often <strong>the</strong><br />

case that shoes are made explicitly for sale, <strong>and</strong> not for <strong>the</strong> general utility when<br />

sold! When later <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1830s British shoemakers realised that price was<br />

not <strong>the</strong> only variable mak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> difference between British <strong>and</strong> French<br />

products, <strong>the</strong>y started consider<strong>in</strong>g a more complex system of factors. <strong>The</strong> price<br />

difference between <strong>London</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Paris</strong> ware was actually decreas<strong>in</strong>g dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

1830s. In 1837 <strong>the</strong> prices <strong>in</strong> <strong>London</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Paris</strong> were similar, with 25 to 30<br />

francs paid for a pair of boots, 35 francs for a Cocanon pair <strong>and</strong> up to 60 francs<br />

for a pair of fancy boots with coloured morocco legs. This was partially due to<br />

a decrease on <strong>London</strong> wages <strong>and</strong> to an <strong>in</strong>crease of French prices, deriv<strong>in</strong>g from<br />

its competitive advantage (premium price). 74 However, French competition was<br />

still very strong. French shoes, if not cheaper, were surely more fashionable.75<br />

A very important feature of French shoes was <strong>the</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>ction between <strong>the</strong><br />

left <strong>and</strong> right shoe. Even if <strong>the</strong> shape of <strong>the</strong> two shoes was not yet different a<br />

label <strong>in</strong>side marked gauche <strong>and</strong> droite dist<strong>in</strong>guished <strong>the</strong> two sides once <strong>the</strong>y<br />

were worn for a while (illustration 6.2).76 It was only dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> 1830s that <strong>the</strong><br />

dist<strong>in</strong>ction between left <strong>and</strong> right shoe had an impact on production. <strong>Shoe</strong>s<br />

started to be produced with two different lasts, <strong>in</strong>stead of be<strong>in</strong>g 'straight'<br />

(illustration 6.3).<br />

72 L.S. Weissbach, 'Artisanal responses to artistic decl<strong>in</strong>e: <strong>the</strong> cab<strong>in</strong>etmakers of <strong>Paris</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

era of <strong>in</strong>dustrialization', Journal of Social History, XVI —2 (1982), p. 68.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Times, 30th August 1830, p. 6, cot. a.<br />

74 J.D. Dacres, <strong>The</strong> boot <strong>and</strong> shoe trade of France, cit., p. 16-7.<br />

Ibid., pp. 9-10.<br />

76 All <strong>the</strong> shoes I exam<strong>in</strong>ed dist<strong>in</strong>guish<strong>in</strong>g right <strong>and</strong> left present labels <strong>in</strong> French. <strong>The</strong> oldest<br />

pair of right vs. left shoes (with labels) surviv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Brita<strong>in</strong> was produced by Thomas Harrison<br />

of Kirby <strong>in</strong> 1796. <strong>The</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>y are already <strong>in</strong> French style suggests that <strong>the</strong>y could be<br />

imported. Left vs. right was used until <strong>the</strong> early seventeenth century when <strong>the</strong> adoption of round<br />

toes shoes made <strong>the</strong> dist<strong>in</strong>ction between left <strong>and</strong> right shoe not necessary. On <strong>the</strong> subject see<br />

J.H. Thornton, 'Left -right-left', Journal of <strong>the</strong> British <strong>Boot</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Shoe</strong> Institutions, VII - 4<br />

(1956), pp. 164-70. See also R.E. Rexford, Women's shoes, cit., p. 13.<br />

278

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!