01.06.2013 Views

The Boot and Shoe Trades in London and Paris in the Long Eighteenth Century

The Boot and Shoe Trades in London and Paris in the Long Eighteenth Century

The Boot and Shoe Trades in London and Paris in the Long Eighteenth Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

This endogenous <strong>and</strong> teleological vision of bus<strong>in</strong>ess has forgotten <strong>the</strong><br />

importance of what is def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess literature as '<strong>the</strong> environment'. <strong>The</strong><br />

market, but also customers, competitors, suppliers <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r firms, def<strong>in</strong>e two<br />

important bus<strong>in</strong>ess functions - retail <strong>and</strong> consumption. <strong>The</strong> limited space given to<br />

historical analyses of consumption <strong>and</strong> retail<strong>in</strong>g has created biases on our<br />

underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g of production. <strong>The</strong> aim is <strong>the</strong>refore to start from consumption <strong>and</strong><br />

arrive .1T an analysis of production though retail<strong>in</strong>g. This 'back to front' perspective<br />

is based on two assumptions. Firstly, production is not considered as antecedent <strong>in</strong><br />

time compared to consumption. If we accept for <strong>in</strong>stance <strong>the</strong> application of<br />

market<strong>in</strong>g practices, production is <strong>the</strong> result of a dialectic process between<br />

producers <strong>and</strong> customers. Secondly, production is not considered as a function<br />

'produc<strong>in</strong>g value', while consumption as a function 'destroy<strong>in</strong>g value'.<br />

Consumption, as <strong>the</strong> act of enjoy<strong>in</strong>g commodities is ra<strong>the</strong>r seen as <strong>the</strong> expression<br />

of 'utility' <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> transformation of potential value <strong>in</strong>to real value. Production is<br />

<strong>in</strong>stead <strong>the</strong> use of natural resources <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> construction of products that have not<br />

any value <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>mselves. In this sense production can be considered as annihilation<br />

of value, transform<strong>in</strong>g a certa<strong>in</strong> value <strong>in</strong>to an uncerta<strong>in</strong> or potential value.<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!