01.06.2013 Views

The Boot and Shoe Trades in London and Paris in the Long Eighteenth Century

The Boot and Shoe Trades in London and Paris in the Long Eighteenth Century

The Boot and Shoe Trades in London and Paris in the Long Eighteenth Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

estricted to only n<strong>in</strong>e <strong>London</strong> shoemakers whose bus<strong>in</strong>ess went bankrupt<br />

between 1822 <strong>and</strong> 1829 (table 5.8).<br />

Table 5.8 - Geographical distribution of n<strong>in</strong>e <strong>London</strong> shoemakers' debts,<br />

1822-1829<br />

Total <strong>in</strong><br />

Year (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) percentage<br />

<strong>London</strong> 1,096 1,344 2,431 1,499 2,863 1,821 611 866 209 45.04<br />

Northampton 204 305 - 486 - - 265 248 3,970 27.97<br />

Daventry - - - 58 - - - 164 35 0.01<br />

Well<strong>in</strong>gborough 1,052 - - - - - - 206 - 6.51<br />

Liverpool - - - 100 - - - 42 - 0.01<br />

Walworth - 40 - - - - - - - 0.01<br />

Not available 8 1,149 - - - - - - 2,800 20.20<br />

Total<br />

2,360 2,838 2,431 2,141 2,863 1,821 876 1,526 7,014 100.00<br />

Source: PRO: (1) B 3/467; (2) B 3/965; (3) B 3/1059; (4) B 3/1357; (5) B 3/1626; (6) B<br />

3/3118/9; (7) B 3/3826; (8) B 3/5286; (9) B 3/5325.<br />

This is <strong>the</strong> period of maximum expansion of Northampton <strong>and</strong> we can see<br />

how more than 27 per cent of debts were due to curriers, tanners <strong>and</strong> shoemakers<br />

<strong>in</strong> Northampton itself. O<strong>the</strong>r Northamptonshire centres such as Daventry <strong>and</strong><br />

Well<strong>in</strong>gborough were becom<strong>in</strong>g important <strong>in</strong> shoe manufactur<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> fact that<br />

most debts to Northampton creditors were recorded as debts to curriers or<br />

tanners can be <strong>in</strong>terpreted <strong>in</strong> different ways. It appears improbable that <strong>London</strong><br />

shoemakers were buy<strong>in</strong>g lea<strong>the</strong>r <strong>in</strong> Northamptonshire. Much more conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g<br />

can be <strong>the</strong> case that Northamptonshire lea<strong>the</strong>r dealers acted as middlemen<br />

produc<strong>in</strong>g shoes on commission <strong>and</strong> putt<strong>in</strong>g out production to local shoemakers.<br />

5.4.2 <strong>The</strong> take-off of <strong>the</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>ces<br />

After 1815 <strong>the</strong> relationship between Northampton <strong>and</strong> <strong>London</strong> changed. <strong>The</strong><br />

first element to evaluate is <strong>the</strong> new position acquired by Northampton. <strong>The</strong><br />

shoemak<strong>in</strong>g trade was <strong>the</strong> primary activity of <strong>the</strong> town <strong>and</strong> experience stretch<strong>in</strong>g<br />

back almost a century had provided not only local skills but, most importantly,<br />

238

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!