01.06.2013 Views

The Boot and Shoe Trades in London and Paris in the Long Eighteenth Century

The Boot and Shoe Trades in London and Paris in the Long Eighteenth Century

The Boot and Shoe Trades in London and Paris in the Long Eighteenth Century

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Not all shops were like Pattison's. John Mayers Clarke who had a shop <strong>in</strong><br />

Lambeth <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> 1 820s was provid<strong>in</strong>g a very traditional <strong>and</strong> basic sett<strong>in</strong>g, as can<br />

be seen from his <strong>in</strong>ventory:<br />

• <strong>The</strong> Glazed Case to enclose <strong>the</strong> W<strong>in</strong>dows with Divisions of Shelves<br />

• A Range of shoe shelves on right h<strong>and</strong> side of <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>dow<br />

• A Range of shoes shelves at back of shop, with glazed front<br />

• <strong>The</strong> Pa<strong>in</strong>ted rail for shoes above mahogany top counter with drawers <strong>in</strong><br />

front; back rail & <strong>in</strong> ramps<br />

• A small cutt<strong>in</strong>g board<br />

• Writ<strong>in</strong>g desk with drawers<br />

• <strong>The</strong> Gass apparatus for 1 night<br />

• <strong>The</strong> two Mansard Buney for Gass <strong>in</strong> W<strong>in</strong>dow.58<br />

Mayers Clarke's shop, as <strong>the</strong> one <strong>in</strong> illustration 18, was more modest than<br />

Pattison. However even shops that were not central <strong>and</strong> fashionable had plenty<br />

of shelves for display<strong>in</strong>g goods, shop w<strong>in</strong>dows that were illum<strong>in</strong>ated at night, as<br />

well as back show cases, probably for <strong>the</strong> high quality products. In <strong>the</strong> 1820s it<br />

was still true that <strong>the</strong> cost of sett<strong>in</strong>g up a shop was very limited. <strong>The</strong> circulat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

capital was disproportionate compared to modern st<strong>and</strong>ards. James Williams, <strong>the</strong><br />

owners of four shoe shops <strong>in</strong> <strong>London</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1829 had a very limited <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> premises <strong>the</strong>mselves (table 4.4). Only 12 per cent of <strong>the</strong> amount of cash<br />

spent <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> year s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> sett<strong>in</strong>g up of <strong>the</strong> shops was <strong>in</strong> furniture. More than<br />

sixty per cent was given for <strong>the</strong> circulat<strong>in</strong>g capital of <strong>the</strong> stock.<br />

Table 4.4 - Value of James Williams' shoe shops <strong>in</strong> 1829 (<strong>in</strong> £)<br />

Yearly O<strong>the</strong>r<br />

Shops Stock Furniture Employees<br />

Rent Expenses<br />

Holbom 2,032 213 241<br />

Fleet Street 1,021 43 276<br />

Cheapside 952 127 180<br />

Sk<strong>in</strong>ner Street 394 480* 200<br />

Total 4,409 863 897<br />

In % 61.0 12.0 12.5<br />

* This <strong>in</strong>cluded expenses for "resett<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> exp<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>g shops".<br />

156 160<br />

249 65<br />

224 50<br />

104 -<br />

733 275<br />

10.5 4.0<br />

Source: PRO, B 3/5325: 'Bankruptcy of James Williams, Holbom, Fleet Street, Cheapside,<br />

Sk<strong>in</strong>ner Street, Snow Hill, 9th July 1829'.<br />

58 PRO, B 3/1059: 'Bankruptcy of John Mayers Clarke, cit.<br />

189

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!