23.06.2013 Views

A HISTORY OF INNER ASIA

A HISTORY OF INNER ASIA

A HISTORY OF INNER ASIA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The conquering Mongols 105<br />

passed through its territory.Like the Uighur idiqut of Turfan, the Hsia<br />

king submitted (though more reluctantly) to Genghis Khan in 1209, but<br />

later the Hsi-Hsia court reneged on the promise and the kingdom paid<br />

for this mistake with its extinction in 1227.<br />

Despite occasional reverses, the Mongol chieftain was successful in all<br />

his undertakings.He displayed the flexibility and pragmatism characteristic<br />

also of some of his successors: a peaceful surrender or, better still,<br />

an anticipatory declaration of allegiance could enable a ruler to keep his<br />

throne and a population to escape a massacre; resistance almost invariably<br />

meant decimation or extermination.In 1209 the aforementioned<br />

Uighur idiqut of Turfan had the foresight to submit in time, and when<br />

summoned, to come in 1211 to pay homage to the incipient conqueror<br />

at his headquarters.By doing this he saved his kingdom, but also did the<br />

Mongols a favor whose value probably few realized at the time: for educated<br />

Uighurs entered Mongol service as bureaucrats and provided the<br />

rapidly growing empire with the kind of expertise that the initially illiterate<br />

nomads lacked.<br />

By 1215 Beijing had fallen to the Mongols.Instead of pursuing the<br />

retreating Chin, however, Genghis Khan turned his main attention westward,<br />

possibly stimulated by an embassy from the Kwarazmshah Ala al-<br />

Din Muhammad which he received soon after his sack of Beijing.The<br />

Khwarazmshah was proposing peaceful relations and commercial<br />

cooperation.<br />

Nevertheless, Genghis Khan’s hosts soon resumed the east–west trend<br />

of Inner Asian nomadic movements.There was an important difference<br />

here, however.Whereas other such phenomena – earlier as well as later<br />

– resulted from a variety of natural or human stimuli such as climatic<br />

vicissitudes or political infighting forcing the losing party to move elsewhere,<br />

Genghis Khan and his immediate successors – basically three<br />

generations – undertook their gigantic conquests only after careful and<br />

comprehensive preparations, by means of an organization that surpassed<br />

any other such undertaking, and with a universalist vision which<br />

some historians ascribe to an ideology claiming a mandate from Heaven<br />

to rule the world.The genius that three generations of Mongol leaders<br />

displayed in all these respects, and the dimensions of the empire which<br />

they created, is a unique historical phenomenon, and it alone may justify<br />

the subsequent charisma which descent from the House of Genghis<br />

Khan retained among the Turco-Mongols of Asia for centuries to come,<br />

even after the myriad scions themselves had lost any merit or real power.<br />

In Central Asia, as we have seen, a sudden expansion of Khwarazm

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!