23.06.2013 Views

A HISTORY OF INNER ASIA

A HISTORY OF INNER ASIA

A HISTORY OF INNER ASIA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Shaybanids 161<br />

Yunus Khan (ruled 1461–86), his grandson Mansur Khan (ruled 1502<br />

or 3–1543), the latter’s brother Said Khan (ruled 1514–32), and Said’s<br />

son Abd al-Rashid Khan (ruled 1532–70) stand out.The fact that the<br />

last three monarchs’ reigns overlap illustrates the concept of family rule,<br />

for Mansur Khan’s domain was Moghulistan proper and northern<br />

Altishahr with Aksu as the capital, whereas Said Khan ruled from<br />

Yarkand in the south.The most interesting personality in this society,<br />

however, is not a prince of the dynasty but a member of the Dughlat<br />

clan, Mir Haydar or Muhammad Haydar Mirza (1499–1551), who<br />

wrote the already quoted Tarikh-i Rashidi, a memorable account of the<br />

dynasty’s history and of the country under their rule.Mir Haydar was a<br />

younger contemporary and a cousin of Babur (his mother, the aforementioned<br />

Khub Nigar Khanim, was a younger sister of Babur’s<br />

mother Qutluq Nigar Khanim), and the analogy between their works<br />

immediately springs to one’s eyes.In contrast to the Baburname written in<br />

Turki, however, the Tarikh-i Rashidi was written in Persian.<br />

One of the bonds between the Shaybanids and the Chaghatayids was<br />

wariness of their immediate neighbors to the north, the Kazakhs of the<br />

eastern Dasht-i Kipchak.These were the territories of what is now<br />

central and southern Kazakhstan, where the formation of a distinct<br />

Kazakh nationality, triggered by the aforementioned and almost anecdotal<br />

defection of Janibeg and Girey, really took shape during the sixteenth<br />

century.Political structure in the Dasht-i Kipchak had become<br />

much looser than that bequeathed by the Mongol empire, and the most<br />

constant feature was the unceasing ebb and flow of alliances, conflicts<br />

and nomadic movements.The Genghisid ancestry of the Shaybanid<br />

line continued to play a role, but it failed to produce personalities strong<br />

enough to create a realm and nation that could play a major role.A new<br />

destiny for Inner Asia had indeed begun to dawn by the middle of the<br />

sixteenth century, and by the turn of the seventeenth its course was<br />

firmly set.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!