23.06.2013 Views

A HISTORY OF INNER ASIA

A HISTORY OF INNER ASIA

A HISTORY OF INNER ASIA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Timur and the Timurids 125<br />

in which he showed a mastery and endurance quite comparable to<br />

Genghis Khan’s.In one respect, however, he never could match his<br />

model’s stature: that of the legitimacy of rule.While Genghis Khan was<br />

unencumbered by the overpowering prestige of any rival regal figure or<br />

dynasty during his arduous beginning and ultimate hegemony, Timur’s<br />

rise and hold on power was in this sense more difficult: by his time, the<br />

charisma of Genghisid descent was so great that virtually no nomadic<br />

ruler in Inner Asia, from those of the Golden Horde all the way to those<br />

of Sinkiang and Mongolia, felt legitimate unless he possessed it or could<br />

state that he was ruling in a Genghisid’s name.There were various ways<br />

to do the latter: alliance through marriage or setting a puppet scion of<br />

the house of Genghis Khan on the throne and ruling in his name were<br />

the most frequent ones, and Timur had recourse to both.He thus never<br />

assumed the supreme title of khan but only that of amir and gurgan,more<br />

correctly küregen, a Mongol term meaning son-in-law – by virtue of his<br />

marriage to a princess of the Genghisid line.A symptom of the purely<br />

formal value of the second stratagem, that of setting up puppet khans<br />

of Genghisid descent, and of the latter’s function as tools in Timur’s<br />

hands, is the fact that the specific line he chose in 1370 was Ögedeyid<br />

rather than Chaghatayid.On the other hand, unlike Genghis Khan,<br />

Timur could claim the right to rule in virtue of being an Islamic<br />

monarch whose success reflected God’s will.It seems, however, that this<br />

posture played a rather marginal role in Timur’s case, and that the main<br />

thrust of his confidence and authority was generated by his political and<br />

military genius.<br />

Timur’s military exploits were spectacular.His campaigns spanned<br />

Eurasia from eastern Sinkiang to southern Russia – Moscow escaped<br />

sack by sheer luck – to India, Syria, and Anatolia.Sacked or conquered<br />

cities such as Delhi, Isfahan, Baghdad, Damascus, Saray, and Izmir<br />

reveal their range.He won signal victories over such adversaries as<br />

Tokhtamish, khan of the Golden Horde, in 1395, Nasir al-din<br />

Mahmudshah, the sultan of Delhi, in 1398, and Bayezid I, the Ottoman<br />

sultan, in 1402.Nevertheless, the empire he founded was in no way comparable<br />

to that established by Genghis Khan, either in size or structure;<br />

and his sons and grandsons themselves lacked the conquering verve of<br />

the successors of Genghis Khan.In this may lie one secret of “Genghisid<br />

charisma,” derived from an altogether unprecedented, and subsequently<br />

unequaled, imperial edifice.<br />

Timur died in 1405 at Otrar – a curious coincidence, for that was the<br />

locality where the incident of 1218 provoked Genghis Khan’s invasion

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!