03.07.2013 Views

Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851 - Queen Mary ...

Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851 - Queen Mary ...

Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851 - Queen Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to have begun, as it did for so many o<strong>the</strong>rs, at Lenoir’s museum, where he sketched <strong>the</strong> tombs<br />

before <strong>the</strong> collection was dismantled and he cont<strong>in</strong>ued to know Lenoir.<br />

Figure 32 The Intervention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Sab<strong>in</strong>e Women, by Jacques-Louis David, 1796-99<br />

In <strong>the</strong> 1790s Langlois also played an almost literally pivotal role <strong>in</strong> David’s own turn<br />

away from revolutionary ideals <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> aftermath <strong>of</strong> Thermidor towards a more conciliatory<br />

political stance. The change <strong>of</strong> direction was signalled <strong>in</strong> David’s art by The Intervention <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

Sab<strong>in</strong>e Women <strong>of</strong> 1796-99 [fig: 32]. Langlois modelled for Romulus, <strong>the</strong> central male figure <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> picture, frozen forever <strong>in</strong> a moment <strong>of</strong> crisis between action and suffer<strong>in</strong>g. It is a resonant<br />

image for <strong>the</strong> similar pa<strong>in</strong>ful ambiguity seems to have run through much <strong>of</strong> his life. There were<br />

<strong>in</strong> him it was said ‘deux temperaments bien dist<strong>in</strong>cts’ [two quite different temperaments]. 152<br />

These were described by contemporaries <strong>in</strong> terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> classical and romantic stra<strong>in</strong>s that met,<br />

or as some thought, clashed, <strong>in</strong> his art. The duality goes fur<strong>the</strong>r, however, extend<strong>in</strong>g to a deep<br />

ambivalence that runs through all his writ<strong>in</strong>gs. Langlois is at times scrupulously factual, ev<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g<br />

contempt for <strong>the</strong> credulity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> past. His discussion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> supposed tomb <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Enervés <strong>of</strong><br />

Jumièges, for example, extends none <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> imag<strong>in</strong>ative sympathy for a syn<strong>the</strong>sis <strong>of</strong> myth and<br />

material that might be expected from an aficionado <strong>of</strong> Lenoir’s museum and is, <strong>in</strong>stead, caustic<br />

about ‘l’extrême crédulité de nos pères’ [our ancestors’ extreme credulousness]. 153 Yet on o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

152<br />

Jules Adel<strong>in</strong>e quoted <strong>in</strong> E-H Langlois, p.86.<br />

153<br />

Langlois, Les Enervés de Jumièges. p.23. For <strong>the</strong> legend and its afterlife see Bussillet, Les Enervés de Jumièges.<br />

148

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!