03.07.2013 Views

Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851 - Queen Mary ...

Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851 - Queen Mary ...

Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851 - Queen Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

its annual congress that he began to attract a wider follow<strong>in</strong>g and to challenge <strong>the</strong> old<br />

order. The Association was broadly antiquarian <strong>in</strong> its terms <strong>of</strong> reference. The modern<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ition <strong>of</strong> archaeology as <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> physical rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> pre-historic past had<br />

been proposed by Willis’s friend, William Whewell (1794-1866), <strong>in</strong> 1837, but <strong>the</strong> older<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word as simply <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> past still co-existed. ‘Archaeological’ was<br />

a more attractive term by <strong>the</strong> 1840s than ‘antiquarian’ when, <strong>in</strong> addition to <strong>the</strong> general<br />

opprobrium that <strong>the</strong> word had always attracted, <strong>the</strong> Society <strong>of</strong> <strong>Antiquaries</strong> was felt by<br />

many, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g John Britton, to have slipped so far from <strong>the</strong> centre <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> debate as to be<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> grip <strong>of</strong> ‘a long and morbid fit <strong>of</strong> apathy and uselessness… constitutionally unfitted<br />

to adm<strong>in</strong>ister to <strong>the</strong> reasonable demands <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> majority <strong>of</strong> its fellows’. 204 It suited better<br />

<strong>the</strong> ethos <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> new reign and <strong>the</strong> foundation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Association, like that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> RIBA,<br />

which received its royal charter <strong>in</strong> 1837, marked a step towards specialisation and<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essionalisation.<br />

At <strong>the</strong> first BAA congress, <strong>in</strong> Canterbury, Willis, as President <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> architectural<br />

section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Association, read his paper on Canterbury ca<strong>the</strong>dral. It was to be his first<br />

and last appearance. A dispute over <strong>the</strong> publication <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proceed<strong>in</strong>gs which it was felt<br />

by some members should not be undertaken for pr<strong>of</strong>it, led to <strong>the</strong> secession <strong>of</strong> Willis and<br />

o<strong>the</strong>rs and <strong>the</strong> formation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> rival Architectural Institute, to which <strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> Willis’s<br />

ca<strong>the</strong>dral studies were delivered. The true reasons for <strong>the</strong> schism were thought by some<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> participants to be social and it was remembered by one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m that ‘<strong>the</strong>re was a<br />

small clique <strong>of</strong> ignorant persons who set up poor old John Britton as a rival to Willis’ and<br />

that ‘Willis’s friends and pupils could not stand such nonsense’. 205 Willis himself,<br />

accord<strong>in</strong>g to Buchanan, prevented Britton from speak<strong>in</strong>g. 206 The follow<strong>in</strong>g year both <strong>the</strong><br />

rival societies met <strong>in</strong> W<strong>in</strong>chester. The BAA was addressed by Edward Cresy (1792-<br />

1858), who had been a member <strong>of</strong> Britton’s short-lived Society <strong>of</strong> <strong>Antiquaries</strong> and<br />

Architects <strong>of</strong> London. Like Willis he was an authority on Italian medieval architecture<br />

but unlike him was also a work<strong>in</strong>g architect, currently employed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> important but<br />

ungenteel capacity <strong>of</strong> sewerage consultant to <strong>the</strong> City <strong>of</strong> London.<br />

204<br />

Britton, Autobiography, (1850), 2, Appendix, p.103.<br />

205<br />

Quoted <strong>in</strong> Buchanan, ‘Robert Willis and <strong>the</strong> Rise <strong>of</strong> Architectural History’, p.104.<br />

206<br />

Buchanan, ‘Robert Willis and <strong>the</strong> Rise <strong>of</strong> Architectural History’, p.104.<br />

95

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!