Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851 - Queen Mary ...
Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851 - Queen Mary ...
Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851 - Queen Mary ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
layer <strong>of</strong> dark sta<strong>in</strong> to make it look homogenous. (Although oak darkens naturally with age <strong>the</strong><br />
sooty blackness <strong>of</strong> most old oak today, <strong>of</strong> any age, is due to its hav<strong>in</strong>g been sta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
n<strong>in</strong>eteenth-century.) 10 At Strawberry Hill Walpole hung his miscellaneous collection <strong>of</strong> armour<br />
<strong>in</strong> a dark part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> staircase to give <strong>the</strong> impression <strong>of</strong> a complete, ancestral collection. 11 At his<br />
own home, Abbotsford, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most important and endur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> antiquarian <strong>in</strong>teriors, on 29<br />
October 1812, Scott reported that he had ‘just f<strong>in</strong>ished a well constructed out <strong>of</strong> a few <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
broken stones taken up <strong>in</strong> clear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> rubbish from Melrose Abbey…It makes a tolerable<br />
deception and looks at least 300 years old’. 12 This literal or figurative piec<strong>in</strong>g toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong><br />
varnish<strong>in</strong>g over <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cracks between past and present, self and o<strong>the</strong>r, were essential to <strong>the</strong> ethos<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> romantic <strong>in</strong>terior.<br />
How know<strong>in</strong>g it was, whe<strong>the</strong>r, as <strong>in</strong> Scott’s case at this stage <strong>in</strong> his life, it was <strong>in</strong>tended to<br />
deceive only at <strong>the</strong> level <strong>of</strong> art or whe<strong>the</strong>r, hav<strong>in</strong>g been created, an <strong>in</strong>terior took on a life <strong>of</strong> its<br />
own <strong>in</strong> which dist<strong>in</strong>ctions between <strong>the</strong> au<strong>the</strong>ntic and <strong>the</strong> fabricated were subsumed, depended on<br />
<strong>the</strong> creator. What was perceived as ‘forgery’ also varied and whe<strong>the</strong>r forgery mattered, was, as at<br />
Lenoir’s museum, a moot po<strong>in</strong>t. Scott’s deception with <strong>the</strong> well at Abbotsford is know<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
<strong>the</strong>refore acceptable to him. To be taken <strong>in</strong> by somebody else’s fabrication would be quite a<br />
different matter. Scott surely <strong>in</strong>tends Sir Arthur Wardour’s surname as a reference to Wardour<br />
Street and <strong>the</strong> fact that Sir Arthur’s taste <strong>in</strong> antiquities was ‘nei<strong>the</strong>r very deep nor very correct’. 13<br />
The Soho brokers had a (deserved) reputation for sell<strong>in</strong>g furniture that was made up from old and<br />
new elements, a process known as ‘sophisticat<strong>in</strong>g’. The term itself, however, suggests an<br />
ambiguity, reflected <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> attitudes <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals, towards <strong>the</strong> propriety <strong>of</strong> such <strong>in</strong>terference<br />
with historic objects and its consequences.<br />
Before discuss<strong>in</strong>g particular <strong>in</strong>teriors <strong>in</strong> more detail we might pause to consider how far<br />
<strong>the</strong> popular image <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Antiquary’s Cell reflected reality for <strong>the</strong> antiquaries under discussion <strong>in</strong><br />
10<br />
Ex <strong>in</strong>f <strong>the</strong> late Clive Wa<strong>in</strong>wright.<br />
11<br />
See Wa<strong>in</strong>wright, Romantic Interior, p.101.<br />
12<br />
Scott to Ma<strong>the</strong>w Weld Hartstonge, Letters, 3, p.185.<br />
13<br />
Scott, The Antiquary, p.52. Wa<strong>in</strong>wright, Romantic Interior, p. 35, says that <strong>the</strong>re were still no brokers <strong>in</strong> Wardour<br />
Street <strong>in</strong> 1817, though <strong>the</strong>re were many cab<strong>in</strong>et makers. I th<strong>in</strong>k <strong>the</strong> co<strong>in</strong>cidence with Scott’s character too<br />
remarkable to be chance and suggest that some at least <strong>of</strong> those describ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>mselves as cab<strong>in</strong>et makers were also<br />
occasional brokers or ‘sophisticators’.<br />
167