03.07.2013 Views

Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851 - Queen Mary ...

Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851 - Queen Mary ...

Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851 - Queen Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

measured details <strong>of</strong> medieval build<strong>in</strong>gs made by A C Pug<strong>in</strong> and his pupils <strong>in</strong>tended,<br />

specifically, for copy<strong>in</strong>g. There were no perspectives or picturesque views <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se books.<br />

Britton, who claimed to be <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>ator <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> idea, though Pug<strong>in</strong> later contested this,<br />

was <strong>the</strong> overall editor. He wrote <strong>in</strong> his Preface that ‘It is hoped and believed that every<br />

form and member here represented can easily be executed, ei<strong>the</strong>r on a scale equal to <strong>the</strong><br />

orig<strong>in</strong>al, and for similar purposes, or reduced to any o<strong>the</strong>r scale’. 131 Both volumes were<br />

dedicated to em<strong>in</strong>ent practis<strong>in</strong>g architects, John Nash, George IV’s favourite architect, for<br />

volume one and Robert Smirke for volume two.<br />

The title <strong>of</strong> Willson’s essays, ‘Remarks on Gothic Architecture and on Modern<br />

Imitations’ underl<strong>in</strong>es <strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>me <strong>of</strong> a direct connection between past and present. Willson<br />

was a Roman Catholic. His view <strong>of</strong> medieval Gothic and its decl<strong>in</strong>e was, like Milner’s,<br />

tendentious, and will be discussed elsewhere. 132 The greater part <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> first essay,<br />

however, deals with post-medieval architecture. Willson wrote both as an antiquary and<br />

as an architect evaluat<strong>in</strong>g his peers. He shared <strong>the</strong> general contemporary dislike <strong>of</strong> Wren<br />

and Hawksmoor’s attempts at Gothic and saw everyth<strong>in</strong>g s<strong>in</strong>ce, ra<strong>the</strong>r as Pevsner did<br />

later, as an unsteady progress towards archaeological accuracy or, as Willson put it,<br />

towards James Essex, ‘<strong>the</strong> first pr<strong>of</strong>essional architect whose works displayed a correct<br />

taste <strong>in</strong> imitations <strong>of</strong> ancient English Architecture’. 133 Willson had no qualms about<br />

condemn<strong>in</strong>g Wyatt’s <strong>in</strong>terventions at Salisbury or <strong>in</strong>deed, <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> second volume <strong>of</strong><br />

Specimens, which was not dedicated to John Nash, Nash’s own palace for George IV,<br />

‘highly decorated with cupolas and m<strong>in</strong>arets <strong>of</strong> eastern taste [*ra<strong>the</strong>r oddly designated<br />

‘The Pavilion’ at Brighton]’. 134<br />

If John Carter was arguably <strong>the</strong> first architectural critic <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> modern sense <strong>the</strong>n<br />

Willson, <strong>in</strong> a more m<strong>in</strong>or key, was perhaps <strong>the</strong> second. He voiced <strong>the</strong> compla<strong>in</strong>t that was<br />

to become general later <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> decade about <strong>the</strong> novelty styles, popular s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> Regency,<br />

131<br />

Pug<strong>in</strong> and Willson, 1821-23, Specimens <strong>of</strong> Gothic Architecture, 1, Preface, np, unsigned but apparently<br />

written by Britton, as editor.<br />

132<br />

See Chapter 5.<br />

133<br />

Pug<strong>in</strong> and Willson, Specimens <strong>of</strong> Gothic Architecture, 1, p. xvi.<br />

134<br />

Pug<strong>in</strong> and Willson, Specimens <strong>of</strong> Gothic Architecture, 2, p. xix and footnote.<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!