03.07.2013 Views

Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851 - Queen Mary ...

Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851 - Queen Mary ...

Antiquaries in the Age of Romanticism: 1789-1851 - Queen Mary ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

surrender my crozier <strong>in</strong>to <strong>the</strong> hands <strong>of</strong> a knot <strong>of</strong> lawyers & fox hunters? … Believe me, Dr Sir, a different<br />

mode <strong>of</strong> proceed<strong>in</strong>g must be followed if Emancipation is ever to be ga<strong>in</strong>ed. 11<br />

In an undated letter sent apparently some months later, <strong>in</strong> which he reported that he was<br />

unable to f<strong>in</strong>d a priest for Gage’s sister-<strong>in</strong>-law, Milner went on:<br />

I am sorry that you prefer writ<strong>in</strong>g to me on trifl<strong>in</strong>g subjects <strong>of</strong> antiquity to <strong>the</strong> all-important & everlast<strong>in</strong>g<br />

concerns <strong>of</strong> Religion...<strong>the</strong> last time I had <strong>the</strong> honour <strong>of</strong> hear<strong>in</strong>g from you, <strong>the</strong>re was question <strong>of</strong> our tak<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>the</strong> Civil-Sword Oath, which proved to be what I <strong>the</strong>n pronounced it <strong>the</strong> Oath <strong>of</strong> Supremacy for refus<strong>in</strong>g<br />

which <strong>the</strong> great More lost his head. 12<br />

Milner’s religious position was what was known as ‘Ultramontane’, that is he<br />

looked to Rome as <strong>the</strong> only source <strong>of</strong> ecclesiastical authority. His objection to <strong>the</strong> terms<br />

on which Emancipation was be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong>fered <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> bill presented to <strong>the</strong> Commons <strong>in</strong> March<br />

1821 was that it required Catholics to subscribe <strong>in</strong> effect to <strong>the</strong> Oath <strong>of</strong> Supremacy,<br />

sett<strong>in</strong>g, as he saw it, <strong>the</strong> state above <strong>the</strong> church. He had lost no time <strong>in</strong> publish<strong>in</strong>g a<br />

pamphlet, which appeared on 13 March and was <strong>in</strong>tended to rally <strong>the</strong> Catholic population<br />

aga<strong>in</strong>st <strong>the</strong> bill. To many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> laity, especially those <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gentry like Gage who were<br />

happy to reach an accommodation with <strong>the</strong> Established Church <strong>in</strong> secular matters,<br />

Milner’s approach seemed unnecessarily divisive and <strong>in</strong>flammatory. By <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> this<br />

second letter to Gage <strong>the</strong> bill had fallen <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lords but Milner was busy rous<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong><br />

Irish clergy <strong>in</strong> support <strong>of</strong> his views. Gage had clearly chosen to ignore <strong>the</strong> whole subject,<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than risk a quarrel. It was a dislike <strong>of</strong> confrontation reflected <strong>in</strong> his antiquarianism.<br />

He was not passive. He was more than will<strong>in</strong>g to enter <strong>in</strong>to public controversy on a<br />

purely antiquarian matter, such as <strong>the</strong> alterations to York M<strong>in</strong>ster, but on subjects <strong>of</strong><br />

Catholic history and politics he sought to avoid dispute and to a great degree succeeded.<br />

Thirteen years later, when Milner was dead and Catholic Emancipation a legal<br />

fact, L<strong>in</strong>gard and Gage were still <strong>in</strong> correspondence. Thank<strong>in</strong>g Gage for a copy <strong>of</strong> his<br />

paper on Anglo-Saxon ritual on 22 April 1834, L<strong>in</strong>gard remarked, not for <strong>the</strong> first time,<br />

11 Hengrave mss 21/1/84.<br />

12 Hengrave mss 21/1/93.<br />

203

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!