17.10.2012 Views

UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...

UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...

UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

enabling them to concentrate on more important matters, delegation improves quality <strong>of</strong><br />

decisions, by moving the decision-making closest to the scene <strong>of</strong> activity.<br />

Delegation improves motivation, initiative and creativity and also helps out in the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> managers in the junior echelons <strong>of</strong> organizations by exposing them<br />

adequately towards complex decision-making. However might be the beneficial outcomes<br />

<strong>of</strong> delegating, there are common barriers to delegation. Reluctance to part with power and<br />

over-confidence <strong>of</strong> the supervisors and a belief that no one else can do the task better than<br />

them, are a few <strong>of</strong> the barriers at the level <strong>of</strong> the delegating administrator. It takes courage<br />

to delegate because delegation does not absolve one from the ultimate responsibility.<br />

Often it is seen that responsibility is feared as much as authority is sought after.<br />

At the recipient’s level, the barriers could be due to inequitable distribution <strong>of</strong><br />

work and the resultant overburden, or fear <strong>of</strong> failure, fear <strong>of</strong> premature display <strong>of</strong><br />

inadequacies <strong>of</strong> oneself, lack or trust in the motives behind delegation, or merely a lack <strong>of</strong><br />

motivation or perceived incompetence on the part <strong>of</strong> the person who has to fulfill the<br />

requirements in terms <strong>of</strong> the delegated tasks. According to Mishra, M.N. (2001),<br />

“delegation would be successful where a wide range <strong>of</strong> people are involved, where the<br />

work provides intrinsic job satisfaction, the work group members accept the<br />

management’s objectives, the employee-employer relations are harmonious, consistency<br />

and coordination are prevalent, and where technology permits individual autonomy and<br />

subordinates welcome responsibility.”<br />

Delegation would be possible only if the higher authority possesses willingness to<br />

trust the subordinates and to allow them to make mistakes and learn from the process. If a<br />

manager clearly delegates authority to undertake a well-defined task, a properly trained<br />

subordinate can get it done with a minimum <strong>of</strong> the supervisor’s time, attention and<br />

involvement. In the context <strong>of</strong> delegation, managers need to accept that there are several<br />

ways to complete a job and that their own ways <strong>of</strong> solving them are not necessarily those<br />

that their subordinates would choose. Superiors could be induced to delegate more by<br />

making them part <strong>of</strong> the team’s performance rather than their own. Where there is a<br />

system <strong>of</strong> appraisal <strong>of</strong> the superiors by the subordinates, a parameter for appraisal should<br />

the formers’ inclination to help the latter through delegation and empowerment.<br />

The practice <strong>of</strong> empowering and delegation challenges managers and employees<br />

alike to pay close attention to the terms <strong>of</strong> their working relationships. Delegation has to<br />

be preceded by careful planning about what tasks could be delegated and in what<br />

sequence. Decisions on who should get the assignment should be based on their workload<br />

and competence. People should be given sufficient resources for carrying out the delegated

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!