UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...
UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...
UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• Working conditions, which reflect the environmental influences <strong>of</strong> noise,<br />
illumination, ventilation, hazards, annoyances and working hours.<br />
Point method is an approach to job evaluation in which numerical values are assigned to<br />
specific job components and the sum <strong>of</strong> these values provides a quantitative assessment <strong>of</strong><br />
a job’s relative worth. The Point method <strong>of</strong> job evaluation consists <strong>of</strong> first developing<br />
compensable factors on which each job must be evaluated. The collection <strong>of</strong> these key<br />
factors is called manual or yardsticks. Each <strong>of</strong> these key compensable factors has a scale<br />
value which defines the degree <strong>of</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> that factor. Each job is rated on these key<br />
factors and a value is assigned accordingly.<br />
Jobs are divided into a specified number <strong>of</strong> grades so that when rates are<br />
established they are not applied to individual jobs but rather to groups <strong>of</strong> jobs that are<br />
rated about the same number <strong>of</strong> points. In choosing point factors, the organizations decide<br />
on the particular job components that they should value. The advantages <strong>of</strong> this method<br />
are that a large number <strong>of</strong> specific factors are included. Off-the-shelf, ready-made plans<br />
are also easily available for a price from HR services and consultancy firms. If an<br />
organization prefers to save costs by developing a complete plan internally, it would be a<br />
time consuming process and more difficult to understand. There is also greater opportunity<br />
for people involved to disagree on many grounds.<br />
4.9.2. Causes <strong>of</strong> Resistance to Job Evaluation<br />
Employees might find it difficult to understand the intricacies <strong>of</strong> Job evaluations. Hence<br />
the pay-scales fixed through job evaluations might susceptible to suspicion from who<br />
might view them as tools <strong>of</strong> clever manipulation and over-exploitation. Supervisors should<br />
have complete knowledge <strong>of</strong> the evaluation system and be able to explain and convince<br />
the employees about the job evaluation plan. The most talented and competent employee<br />
tend to resent the wages fixed through job evaluation, as they expect their contribution<br />
must get extra reward. In a world <strong>of</strong> fast changing technology and rapid mobility <strong>of</strong> capital<br />
and labor, job evaluation carried out at great investment <strong>of</strong> time and cost might soon loose<br />
their relevance and might need complete revision. Practices like poaching talents from<br />
another organization and relaxed working conditions for some employees, might make a<br />
mockery out <strong>of</strong> job evaluations.<br />
Obtaining a precise value <strong>of</strong> an employee’s contribution to the organization might<br />
be difficult, as work output occurs due to the interplay <strong>of</strong> large number <strong>of</strong> factors. Job<br />
evaluation helps to reach a reasonable degree <strong>of</strong> accuracy in achieving this valuation. Job<br />
evaluation would have greater chances to succeed when it does not disturb the existing<br />
promotion paths or the traditional pattern. It is not likely to succeed when the organization