17.10.2012 Views

UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...

UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...

UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Working conditions, which reflect the environmental influences <strong>of</strong> noise,<br />

illumination, ventilation, hazards, annoyances and working hours.<br />

Point method is an approach to job evaluation in which numerical values are assigned to<br />

specific job components and the sum <strong>of</strong> these values provides a quantitative assessment <strong>of</strong><br />

a job’s relative worth. The Point method <strong>of</strong> job evaluation consists <strong>of</strong> first developing<br />

compensable factors on which each job must be evaluated. The collection <strong>of</strong> these key<br />

factors is called manual or yardsticks. Each <strong>of</strong> these key compensable factors has a scale<br />

value which defines the degree <strong>of</strong> presence <strong>of</strong> that factor. Each job is rated on these key<br />

factors and a value is assigned accordingly.<br />

Jobs are divided into a specified number <strong>of</strong> grades so that when rates are<br />

established they are not applied to individual jobs but rather to groups <strong>of</strong> jobs that are<br />

rated about the same number <strong>of</strong> points. In choosing point factors, the organizations decide<br />

on the particular job components that they should value. The advantages <strong>of</strong> this method<br />

are that a large number <strong>of</strong> specific factors are included. Off-the-shelf, ready-made plans<br />

are also easily available for a price from HR services and consultancy firms. If an<br />

organization prefers to save costs by developing a complete plan internally, it would be a<br />

time consuming process and more difficult to understand. There is also greater opportunity<br />

for people involved to disagree on many grounds.<br />

4.9.2. Causes <strong>of</strong> Resistance to Job Evaluation<br />

Employees might find it difficult to understand the intricacies <strong>of</strong> Job evaluations. Hence<br />

the pay-scales fixed through job evaluations might susceptible to suspicion from who<br />

might view them as tools <strong>of</strong> clever manipulation and over-exploitation. Supervisors should<br />

have complete knowledge <strong>of</strong> the evaluation system and be able to explain and convince<br />

the employees about the job evaluation plan. The most talented and competent employee<br />

tend to resent the wages fixed through job evaluation, as they expect their contribution<br />

must get extra reward. In a world <strong>of</strong> fast changing technology and rapid mobility <strong>of</strong> capital<br />

and labor, job evaluation carried out at great investment <strong>of</strong> time and cost might soon loose<br />

their relevance and might need complete revision. Practices like poaching talents from<br />

another organization and relaxed working conditions for some employees, might make a<br />

mockery out <strong>of</strong> job evaluations.<br />

Obtaining a precise value <strong>of</strong> an employee’s contribution to the organization might<br />

be difficult, as work output occurs due to the interplay <strong>of</strong> large number <strong>of</strong> factors. Job<br />

evaluation helps to reach a reasonable degree <strong>of</strong> accuracy in achieving this valuation. Job<br />

evaluation would have greater chances to succeed when it does not disturb the existing<br />

promotion paths or the traditional pattern. It is not likely to succeed when the organization

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!