17.10.2012 Views

UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...

UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...

UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Once the jobs that are to be evaluated are listed out, the committee sets its tasks<br />

towards analyzing the jobs and preparing job description statements with regard to each <strong>of</strong><br />

them. The next activity would be to select the method <strong>of</strong> evaluation to be adopted, keeping<br />

in mind organizational constraints and the job factors. This activity is followed by the<br />

classification <strong>of</strong> jobs in order <strong>of</strong> importance. Once installed, the scheme <strong>of</strong> job evaluation<br />

should be reviewed periodically. The review should also benchmark at model<br />

organizations emerging out to be the best paymasters in the perception <strong>of</strong> prospective<br />

employees.<br />

4.9.1. Methods <strong>of</strong> Job Evaluation:<br />

There are four commonly adopted major methods <strong>of</strong> job evaluation, each with their own<br />

inherent strengths. They are called ranking method, job classification method, factor<br />

comparison method and point method.<br />

Ranking Method: The raters examine the description <strong>of</strong> each job being evaluated ad<br />

arrange the job in order according to their value to the company. Thus all jobs are rank<br />

ordered and pairs <strong>of</strong> jobs could be compared. Prior to this, the organization would have to<br />

conduct job analysis and job description. It is the simplest <strong>of</strong> all methods and is<br />

inexpensive. A major hurdle in using this method is that it does not measure the<br />

differences between the jobs belonging to two ranks. Thus, the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the difference<br />

between the jobs ranked first and second, may not be the same as the magnitude <strong>of</strong> the<br />

difference between jobs ranked third and fourth.<br />

Classification Method (Job Grading Method): This method involves defining a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> grades or classes to describe a collection <strong>of</strong> jobs. The team <strong>of</strong> raters compares the job<br />

description with the class descriptions based on jobs at various difficulty levels. It is<br />

simple to understand and easy to use. But at times, the grade descriptions could be<br />

ambiguous and overlapping.<br />

Factor Comparison Method: The raters make decisions on separate aspects or<br />

factors <strong>of</strong> the job as they evaluate jobs. The five universal job factors are<br />

• Mental requirements, which reflect traits such as intelligence, reasoning and<br />

imagination.<br />

• Skills pertaining to psychomotor coordination and interpretation <strong>of</strong> sensory<br />

impressions and the experience, education and training required to acquire them in<br />

requisite levels.<br />

• Physical requirements that involve sitting, standing, walking, lifting etc.<br />

• Responsibilities that cover areas such as handling raw materials, equipments,<br />

machinery, public relations, employees, money, records and supervision.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!