17.10.2012 Views

UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...

UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...

UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Adam’s Equity Theory:<br />

Stacy Adams (1963) advocated Equity theory states that employees should be perceived as<br />

fair in comparison with various factors. Adams explained inequity as an injustice<br />

perceived by a person when he compares the ratio <strong>of</strong> his outcomes in the form <strong>of</strong> rewards<br />

to his inputs in the form <strong>of</strong> efforts, with the ratio <strong>of</strong> the inputs and outputs <strong>of</strong> another<br />

comparable person and finds that it is to his disadvantage and that they are being underrewarded<br />

or over-rewarded. For example, when people <strong>of</strong> same educational<br />

qualifications, age-group, experience-levels and levels <strong>of</strong> Intelligence quotient are placed,<br />

the first to be employed might be placed in the regular cadre, while the subsequent<br />

appointed persons could be placed in a contractual mode <strong>of</strong> appointment. Such practices<br />

can bring forth feelings <strong>of</strong> inequity and de-motivation among the latter.<br />

The referent with which employees choose to compare themselves is an important<br />

variable in equity theory. The three referent categories have been classified as “other,”<br />

“system,” and “self.” The “other” category includes other individuals with similar jobs in<br />

the same organization and also includes friends, neighbors, or pr<strong>of</strong>essional associates. On<br />

the basis <strong>of</strong> information they receive through word <strong>of</strong> mouth, newspapers and magazine<br />

articles on issues such as executive salaries or a recent union contract, employees compare<br />

their pay with that <strong>of</strong> others.<br />

The “system” category considers organizational pay policies and procedures and<br />

the administration <strong>of</strong> this system. It considers organization-wide pay policies, both implied<br />

and explicit. Precedents by the organization on matters <strong>of</strong> allocation <strong>of</strong> pay are major<br />

determinants in this category. The “self” category refers to inputs-outcomes ratios that are<br />

unique to the individual. It might reflect past personal experiences or other occupations<br />

presently held. The choice <strong>of</strong> a particular set <strong>of</strong> referents is related to the information<br />

available about referents as well as to their perceived relevance.<br />

On the basis <strong>of</strong> the nuances <strong>of</strong> equity theory, when employees perceive any<br />

significant inequity in their working conditions or pay, they might follow any one or more<br />

<strong>of</strong> the following options:<br />

a. Distort either their own or other’s inputs or outcomes;<br />

b. Behave in some way to induce others to change their inputs or outputs;<br />

c. Behave in some way to change their own inputs or outcomes<br />

d. Choose a different comparison referent and /or<br />

e. Give up and quit their jobs.<br />

Goal setting theory <strong>of</strong> motivation:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!