UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...
UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...
UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
is not paying above market rate and if it results in too drastic pay revisions within existing<br />
structures. At times, the geographic isolation <strong>of</strong> an organization could also make it less<br />
comparable to other employers. Employees’ Unions could totally reject or even nullify the<br />
outcomes <strong>of</strong> job evaluation if the employer’s relationships with most <strong>of</strong> them are not<br />
cordial.<br />
4.10. PRODUCTIVITY:<br />
Productivity might be described as the rate <strong>of</strong> production per unit <strong>of</strong> input expenditure<br />
involving time and cost. Some describe productivity as the judicious use <strong>of</strong> productive<br />
resources-physical as well as mental. It is the numerically stated measure <strong>of</strong> how well an<br />
operations system functions and an indicator <strong>of</strong> the efficiency and competitiveness <strong>of</strong> a<br />
single firm or department. Productivity is used by people to mean different things. To the<br />
employers, productivity means lower and lower costs. To the employee it could mean<br />
harder and harder work, and therefore lesser real wages than the past years for work <strong>of</strong><br />
equal intensity and hardship.<br />
Productivity is considered to a function <strong>of</strong> factors like physical factors, situational<br />
factors and individual factors. An employee’s productivity is determined by that person’s<br />
motivation and ability to perform a task. In case <strong>of</strong> teamwork, a group’s size,<br />
compositions, norms, interpersonal understanding, cohesion and its leadership would<br />
determine the group’s productivity. In the same way, an organization’s productivity<br />
would depend on its culture, climate, leadership, vision and missions, learning and<br />
entrepreneurship. The exponents <strong>of</strong> productivity regard labor productivity as one <strong>of</strong> the<br />
basic rods <strong>of</strong> measurement <strong>of</strong> economic development and as one <strong>of</strong> the key determinants<br />
<strong>of</strong> national income.<br />
Tom Peters and Waterman, the specialists on organizational excellence, have paid<br />
due emphasis on productivity improvements that are achieved through people. According<br />
to them, progressive organizations would treat the ordinary members <strong>of</strong> the organization<br />
as the basic source <strong>of</strong> productivity and quality gains. These organizations do not regard<br />
capital investment and labor substitution as the fundamental source <strong>of</strong> productivity<br />
enhancement. Their people orientation is marked by performance consciousness, but the<br />
personal achievements stem mainly from developing mutually high expectations and peer<br />
review rather than exhortation and complicated command and control systems. They work<br />
very hard to cut the need for intrusive forms <strong>of</strong> corporate management, believing that the<br />
less <strong>of</strong> direct intervention from higher management there is the better it is for the<br />
productivity <strong>of</strong> the organization.