17.10.2012 Views

UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...

UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...

UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The problem <strong>of</strong> increasing productivity implies the complete, appropriate and<br />

efficient utilization <strong>of</strong> available resources <strong>of</strong> human beings, machines, money, power,<br />

land, time and other wherewithal. Productivity as a concept connotes a mass attack on<br />

waste <strong>of</strong> every type <strong>of</strong> resources and in all fields <strong>of</strong> production. It implies development <strong>of</strong><br />

a constant urge to find improved, cheaper, quicker, easier and safer ways <strong>of</strong> doing a job,<br />

manufacturing a product or providing a service.<br />

4.10.1. Job-Satisfaction and Productivity<br />

Many employers set the goal for making employees happy on the assumption that this will<br />

lead to high productivity. This is possibly a misdirected assumption. Managers who follow<br />

this strategy could end up with a very happy but poorly performing group <strong>of</strong> employees.<br />

While unhappy workers might become unproductive, happy workers are not always<br />

productive workers. If feeling <strong>of</strong> satisfaction does have a positive effect on productivity,<br />

which effect has been found to be fairly small and negligible. Peak performance in an<br />

individual depends upon a myriad <strong>of</strong> variables like visualization, positive self-concept,<br />

intense focus and concentration while facing demanding situations.<br />

Factors affecting productivity would also differ according to the nature <strong>of</strong> the job.<br />

An employee’s productivity level on machine-paced jobs is going to be more influenced<br />

by the speed <strong>of</strong> the tools and mechanical devices than by his or her level <strong>of</strong> satisfaction.<br />

However, the satisfaction-performance correlations are found to be stronger for higherlevel<br />

employees. Thus, one might expect the relationship to be more relevant for<br />

individuals in pr<strong>of</strong>essional, supervisory, executive and managerial positions rather than for<br />

manual workers. In front <strong>of</strong>fice jobs that involve direct face-to-face interaction with<br />

customers and other visitors, satisfaction could influence the subtle forms <strong>of</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong><br />

employees including their postures and gestures, which could alter their personal<br />

effectiveness.<br />

The more valid conclusion emerging amidst management scientists is that<br />

productivity would lead to satisfaction than the other way round. Managers would get<br />

better results by directing their attention primarily to the question <strong>of</strong> what will help<br />

employees to become more productive. Successful job performance should then logically<br />

lead to feelings <strong>of</strong> accomplishment. The secondary outcomes would be in the forms <strong>of</strong><br />

increased pay, perquisites, promotions and other automatic rewards which are desirable<br />

outcomes <strong>of</strong> working hard and smart, from a job-holder’s point <strong>of</strong> view. These feelings<br />

would then contribute towards satisfaction with the job.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!