17.10.2012 Views

UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...

UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...

UNIT – I Lesson 1 HRM – AN OVERVIEW Lesson Outline Nature of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Job evaluation is defined as the process <strong>of</strong> objectively analyzing and assessing the value <strong>of</strong><br />

each job in relation to other jobs in an organization. It aims at finding the relative worth <strong>of</strong><br />

a job and to establish a rational and equitable pay structure. Fredrick Taylor was the<br />

pioneer who designed a formal, systematic way <strong>of</strong> assigning pay to jobs for improving<br />

productivity. His methodology came to be known as Job Evaluation. It compares jobs to<br />

one another based on their content, which is usually defined in terms <strong>of</strong> compensated<br />

factors such as skill, effort, responsibility and working conditions. It is mostly a<br />

judgmental process that demands close cooperation between supervisors, HR specialists<br />

and the representatives <strong>of</strong> employers and employees.<br />

Industry has become increasingly aware <strong>of</strong> the need for a systematic and an<br />

objective approach to setting the worth and price <strong>of</strong> each management position in relation<br />

to others within a business management group, and to similar management positions<br />

within a geographic region or an industry. While the shop floor and clerical planners<br />

normally evaluate a job in terms <strong>of</strong> its duties, a managerial position is always evaluated in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> responsibilities, which could include those related to making others perform their<br />

duties.<br />

Job evaluation is highly dynamic in nature. It is not a one-time project but is<br />

something that must be maintained on an ongoing basis. Jobs do go through change and it<br />

is imperative that when any alteration happen the job evaluation has to be reviewed and<br />

amended to reflect the change. Since Job evaluation examines the effect <strong>of</strong> skills,<br />

capabilities, responsibilities and work environment on the performance <strong>of</strong> the job in a<br />

particular context, it cannot be automatically transplanted from one company to another.<br />

There would be a lot <strong>of</strong> localized adaptation before finalizing a job evaluation format.<br />

Since salaries paid depend upon the classification <strong>of</strong> jobs, job evaluations would have to<br />

be done conscientiously and administered judiciously.<br />

Job evaluation rates the job and not the person going to occupy it. The cycle <strong>of</strong> job<br />

evaluation is launched first by way <strong>of</strong> creating a by a committee <strong>of</strong> personnel trained in the<br />

process, consisting <strong>of</strong> heads <strong>of</strong> various departments, representatives <strong>of</strong> employees and a<br />

specialist on the field, along with the team <strong>of</strong> Human Resource Department. The team <strong>of</strong><br />

raters would use the job descriptions to determine the relative worth <strong>of</strong> every job in<br />

comparison with others. In this process, the committee should subject all the relevant<br />

external and internal factors into their active consideration before arriving at a final<br />

scheme <strong>of</strong> fixing pay scales. A general guideline provided to these committees is that too<br />

many levels <strong>of</strong> pay scales should be avoided through proper grading <strong>of</strong> jobs.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!