Sustainable Microfinance - Balanced Scorecard's added value for ...
Sustainable Microfinance - Balanced Scorecard's added value for ...
Sustainable Microfinance - Balanced Scorecard's added value for ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Considering the inductive exploratory approach of this study great <strong>value</strong> has been<br />
placed on the exact response of interviewees. There<strong>for</strong>e, (1) all the questions of the<br />
interviewer have been transcribed; (2) the verbalizations have been literally<br />
transcribed; and (3) observations during the interview (e.g., sounds, pauses, and<br />
other audible behaviours) have been transcribed (Schilling, 2006).<br />
4.4.2 Step 2: Defining the Unit of Analysis<br />
The unit of analysis refers to the basic unit of text to be classified during content<br />
analysis. Messages have been unitized be<strong>for</strong>e they were coded, since differences in<br />
the unit definition could affect the coding decision as well as the comparability of<br />
outcomes with other similar studies (De Wever et al., 2006). There<strong>for</strong>e, defining the<br />
coding unit was one of the most fundamental and important decisions (Weber, 1990).<br />
For the qualitative content analysis individual themes have been used as the unit <strong>for</strong><br />
analysis. By using themes as the coding unit, the emphasis was primarily on<br />
indentifying expressions of ideas (Minichiello et al., 1990). Thus, codes have been<br />
assigned to text chunks of any size, as long as that chunk represented a single<br />
theme or issue of relevance to the research question(s).<br />
4.4.3 Step 3: Developing Categories<br />
Categories and have been derived from three sources: the data, previous related<br />
studies, and theories. Inductively content analysis is particularly appropriate <strong>for</strong><br />
studies that intend to develop theory. While developing categories inductively from<br />
raw data, the constant comparative method (Glaser & Strauss, 1967) was used. This<br />
enabled to make differences between categories apparent and not only focus on<br />
original insights. The essence of the constant comparative method is (1) the<br />
systematic comparison of each text assigned to a category with each of those<br />
already assigned to that category, in order to fully understand the theoretical<br />
properties of the category; and (2) integrating categories and their properties through<br />
the development of interpretive memos. This has been done according to the step<br />
model of inductive category development (Mayring, 2000) (see figure 4.1)<br />
Elmar Hoogendoorn 47<br />
<strong>Sustainable</strong> <strong>Microfinance</strong>