ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 18 july 2006

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Ordinary Meeting <strong>of</strong> Council - 18 July 2006 3 / 22 15 TO 19 TURRAMURRA AVENUE AND 1 TO 1A WONGA WONGA STREET, TURRAMURRA Item 3 DA0068/06 7 July 2006 The building height is appropriately stepped <strong>to</strong> reduce the scale at the zone boundary interface and it is considered that the balconies at the third and fourth s<strong>to</strong>rey do not have a significant impact. The construction <strong>of</strong> the balconies in Apartments A17, A18, A23 and A24 provides a <strong>be</strong>tter environmental outcome by providing a much higher level <strong>of</strong> articulation <strong>to</strong> the façade <strong>of</strong> the building than would <strong>be</strong> evident if the balconies were <strong>to</strong> comply with the development standard. Overshadowing is negligible and opportunities for overlooking will <strong>be</strong> minimized through the use <strong>of</strong> landscaping in the setback. The area where the proposal exceeds the setback requirement is minor and represents an insignificant portion <strong>to</strong> the overall scale <strong>of</strong> the development. In this respect, strict compliance with the standard is unnecessary and unreasonable in this circumstance. In this regard, it is warranted that the minimum setback <strong>to</strong> the zone boundary interface <strong>be</strong> varied under both the provisions <strong>of</strong> SEPP 1 and the draft SEPP (Application <strong>of</strong> Development Standards) 2004.” Zone Interface (cl.25L) Part <strong>of</strong> Block A breaches the minimum 9 metre zone interface boundary setback <strong>to</strong> the eastern boundary. An objection under SEPP 1 seeking variation <strong>to</strong> the development standard was lodged. The following is an assessment <strong>of</strong> the adequacy <strong>of</strong> the SEPP 1 using criteria established in this instrument and by the Land and Environment Court. 1. Whether the planning control in question is a development standard. Clause 25L(3) is a development standard. 2. The underlying objective or purpose <strong>be</strong>hind the standard The objective <strong>of</strong> this clause is <strong>to</strong> provide a transition in the scale <strong>of</strong> buildings <strong>be</strong>tween certain zones. 3. Is compliance with the development standard consistent with the aims <strong>of</strong> the Policy and does compliance tend <strong>to</strong> hinder the attainment <strong>of</strong> the objects specified in section 5(a)(i) and (ii) <strong>of</strong> the EP & A Act 1979. The proposal will not hinder the attainment <strong>of</strong> the object <strong>of</strong> section 5(a)(i) and (ii) <strong>of</strong> the environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. 4. Is compliance with the development standard unreasonable or unnecessary in the circumstance. Compliance is unreasonable and unnecessary in the circumstance for the reasons given under the SEPP 1 assessment. 5. Is the objection well founded? Despite the variation, the development will meet the underlying objectives <strong>of</strong> this control <strong>to</strong> provide a reasonable transition <strong>of</strong> built form <strong>be</strong>tween the higher and lower density planning zones. The main component <strong>of</strong> the building envelope is compliant with the setback requirement, there are no N:\060718-OMC-PR-03482-15 TO 19 TURRAMURRA AVENU.doc/murphy/22
Ordinary Meeting <strong>of</strong> Council - 18 July 2006 3 / 23 15 TO 19 TURRAMURRA AVENUE AND 1 TO 1A WONGA WONGA STREET, TURRAMURRA Item 3 DA0068/06 7 July 2006 significant amenity or streetscape impacts and the design provides a reasonable transition <strong>be</strong>tween the zones. This is supported by the satisfac<strong>to</strong>ry landscaping along the common boundary, reasonable articulation <strong>of</strong> the building provided by the balconies and the minimal overshadowing impacts. Consequently, the variation is supported in this instance. Heritage/ Conservation areas (cl.61D-61I) The development will not result in any adverse impact on the adjoining heritage item. The development satisfies the objectives for residential zones as prescri<strong>be</strong>d in clause 25D. POLICY PROVISIONS Development Control Plan No.55 – Railway/ Pacific Highway Corridor & St Ives Centre COMPLIANCE TABLE Development control Proposed Complies Part 3 Local context: Development adjacent <strong>to</strong> a heritage item: • 10m setback 13.5m Yes (1 st & 2 nd s<strong>to</strong>reys) • 15m setback 13.5m No (3 rd & 4 th s<strong>to</strong>reys) • No closer than heritage Not closer Yes item from front boundary Part 4.1 Landscape design: Deep soil landscaping (min) • 150m 2 per 1000m 2 <strong>of</strong> site area = 887.25m 2 Approximately 2922.01m 2 Yes No. <strong>of</strong> tall trees required (min): 20 trees >20 (subject <strong>to</strong> conditions) Yes Part 4.2 Density: Building footprint (max): • 35% <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>tal site area 35% Yes Floor space ratio (max): • 1.3:1 1.307:1 No Part 4.3 Setbacks: Street boundary setback (min): • 13-15 metres - Turramurra Ave Block A (side) Block B (front) - Block A - Wonga Wonga Ave (front) 12.4m 13m 14m No Yes Yes N:\060718-OMC-PR-03482-15 TO 19 TURRAMURRA AVENU.doc/murphy/23
Page 1 and 2:
ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL TO BE H
Page 3 and 4:
GB.2 2 Princes Street, Turramurra -
Page 5 and 6:
GB.8 Heritage Advisory Committee Mi
Page 7 and 8:
GB.14 Town Centres - Change <strong
Page 9 and 10:
2. The General Manager tables a dra
Page 11 and 12:
Environmental Planning & Assessment
Page 13 and 14:
Ordinary Meeting of</strong
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19:
Page 23 and 24: • To enable other land uses that
Page 25 and 26: 5 11 1 186 9 17 42 40 AVE 39 37 R4
Page 27 and 28: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
Page 73: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
Page 119: Ordinary Meeting of</strong
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
Ku-ring-gai Council Draft Investmen
Page 156 and 157:
March 2006 Ku-ring-gai Council Inve
Page 158 and 159:
March 2006 Ku-ring-gai Council Inve
Page 160 and 161:
Page 162 and 163:
Page 164 and 165:
Page 166 and 167:
Rehabilitation ($1,693,600) BOUNDAR
Page 168 and 169:
SYDNEY ROAD EAST LINDFIELD TRYON RO
Page 170 and 171:
Rehabilitation ABINGDON ROAD ROSEVI
Page 172 and 173:
PROGRAM FOR 2009/10 Infrastructure
Page 174 and 175:
PROGRAM FOR 2010/11 Infrastructure
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
Page 182 and 183:
services provided by the Cus<strong
Page 184 and 185:
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
MEETING OPENED: 6.35 PM 1.0 APOLOGI
Page 190 and 191:
8.0 Productivity Commission Report
Page 192 and 193:
MEETING OPEN: 6.40PM MINUTES HERITA
Page 194 and 195:
●3 & 7 Taunton C
Page 196 and 197:
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Undertake Inspections & Investigati
Page 202 and 203:
Cardiospermum grandiflorum Balloon
Page 204 and 205:
Class 1 - State Prohibited Weeds. "
Page 206 and 207:
Spot spray small infestations with
Page 208 and 209:
Herbicide control. Spot spray with
Page 210 and 211:
For small infestations, chip isolat
Page 212 and 213:
Manual control. For small scale inf
Page 214 and 215:
Manual control. Young plants are ea
Page 216 and 217:
Saplings (5cm trunk diameter) can <
Page 218 and 219:
1. Collect the fragile eggsticks ca
Page 220 and 221:
Herbicide control. Spray Pampas Gra
Page 222 and 223:
Remove the remaining runners found
Page 224 and 225:
There is no registered herbicide av
Page 226 and 227:
emoving each runner roots from the
Page 228 and 229:
Where no off targe
Page 230 and 231:
For large infestations on the groun
Page 232 and 233:
For small infestations, use hand re
Page 234 and 235:
2. Mealy Bug - Hypogeococcus fester
Page 236 and 237:
Sydney North Regional Weeds Strateg
Page 238 and 239:
Spray with a registered herbicide.
Page 240 and 241:
LINKAGES TO OTHER PLANS, STRATEGIES
Page 242 and 243:
For larger infestations, spray the
Page 244 and 245:
Stems are generally sof</st
Page 246 and 247:
Herbicide control. Use a registered
Page 248 and 249:
For small scale infestations (under
Page 250 and 251:
esidents concerning Bamboo growth.
Page 252 and 253:
• If the barrier is not continuou
Page 254 and 255:
General information on control meth
Page 256 and 257:
Sydney North Regional Weeds Committ
Page 258 and 259:
Page 260 and 261:
Page 262 and 263:
Page 264 and 265:
Page 266 and 267:
Page 268 and 269:
Page 270 and 271:
James Rennie and Nancy Pallin provi
Page 272 and 273:
State of the Envir
Page 274 and 275:
Feral Animal Control The fox bating
Page 276 and 277:
Fire management Council’s fire ma
Page 278 and 279:
Priority 1 Carlyle Rd (stage 2, Eas
Page 280 and 281:
Table 1 perceptions of</str
Page 282 and 283:
Environmental care and education pr
Page 284 and 285:
Encroachments, noxious weeds and du
Page 286 and 287:
Attachment 1: The Value of<
Page 288 and 289:
Attachment 2: Summary Actions Summa
Page 290 and 291:
Figure 2 graph of
Page 292 and 293:
Note this data covers seven years h
Page 294 and 295:
Results and discussion The followin
Page 296 and 297:
Bush walking (32.6%) was identified
Page 298 and 299:
Q. 9 If you don’t visit bushland
Page 300 and 301:
Demographics Gender Responses 140 1
Page 302 and 303:
Country of Birth 1
Page 304 and 305:
Qualitative Responses to</s
Page 306 and 307:
service to <strong
Page 308 and 309:
Q.5 At what time/s do you most freq
Page 310 and 311:
Q.17 You are: Male Female Q.18What
Page 312 and 313:
Page 314 and 315:
Page 316 and 317:
Page 318 and 319:
Page 320 and 321:
Page 322 and 323:
11 15 9 5 6 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 2B
Page 324 and 325:
Page 326 and 327:
Page 328 and 329:
Page 330 and 331:
Page 332 and 333:
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336:
show all

ordinary meeting of council to be held on tuesday, 18 july 2006

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?