THE DHAMMAPADA: THE WAY OF THE BUDDHA, VOL. 9-12 The ...
THE DHAMMAPADA: THE WAY OF THE BUDDHA, VOL. 9-12 The ...
THE DHAMMAPADA: THE WAY OF THE BUDDHA, VOL. 9-12 The ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
222 <strong>THE</strong> <strong>DHAMMAPADA</strong>: <strong>THE</strong> <strong>WAY</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>BUDDHA</strong>, <strong>VOL</strong>. 9-<strong>12</strong><br />
But here on the earth the politicians make much fuss. Politics has become the center of life; your newspapers<br />
are full of it, your radio programs are full of it. Everything seems to be colored by politics for the simple reason<br />
that these people have got something which you are all hankering for they have got name and fame.<br />
But Buddha says: WHY MISS WHAT YOU DO NOT HAVE? And, in fact, why miss that which you do not<br />
have and can never have? To believe that you are famous is to live in a fool’s paradise. And even if your name is<br />
going to be written in history... you can make so much nuisance that they will have to write it down in history.<br />
Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin and Mao Zedong, of course their names will remain in history, but not in golden<br />
letters. History is not written in golden letters at all, and their names will be only in some footnotes. And even if<br />
they are there, what does it matter? Your whole history is bunk! It is less history and more hysteria! Of course,<br />
if you are very hysterical you will become historical. But what is the point of it all? You would have missed a<br />
great opportunity.<br />
<strong>The</strong> real man does not care about name and fame. <strong>The</strong> authentic man lives his life irrespective of name and<br />
fame; he does not care a bit whether anybody knows him or not.<br />
<strong>THE</strong> SEEKER IS NOT SORRY.<br />
Buddha says: Teach people that the search for truth should not be a sad search. This is one of the things which<br />
has been very much misunderstood. Somehow the sad people have dominated the whole religious scene down the<br />
ages. Only once in a while do you find a Buddha or a Jesus or a Zarathustra who talks about joy, who talks about<br />
living in bliss. Only once in a while do you find a Krishna who not only teaches dance but dances himself, who<br />
not only teaches singing but sings himself. Otherwise the scene is dominated by pathological people, either by<br />
masochists or by sadists.<br />
Ninety-nine percent of so-called religious people are ill, seriously ill people. <strong>The</strong>y have gone into religion because<br />
they have failed in life, they have gone into religion because they could not cope with life. It is an escape and<br />
the escapist can never be happy.<br />
Christians say that Jesus never laughed. Now, there cannot be a greater lie than that. Jesus, and never<br />
laughed? <strong>The</strong>n who will be able to laugh? <strong>The</strong>n nobody will be able to laugh at all! And the whole life of Jesus<br />
proves that he must have been a man of very joyous nature. He must have been really spiritual in the sense<br />
the French use the word spirituel. In French this word ’spirituel’ means both ”spiritual” and ”humorous.” <strong>The</strong>re<br />
seems to be a great insight in it the same word meaning both. He must have laughed with his companions. It is<br />
well known that he used to enjoy eating and drinking, and when a man enjoys eating and drinking it is difficult to<br />
think of him never laughing. People who enjoy eating and drinking, people who enjoy parties, also enjoy dancing<br />
and singing and joking. He must have laughed, he must have joked. One cannot believe that twenty-four hours a<br />
day he was delivering only gospels he must have gossiped!<br />
But the people who are sad, they would like him also to be sad. All the figures, statues, paintings of Jesus seem<br />
to be false. And they have been changing down the ages. In the earliest pictures he was shown without beard<br />
and mustache. After two centuries, suddenly the beard and the mustache appeared because without a beard and<br />
a mustache he did not look like a prophet; he looked too young, not mature enough. A face without a beard and<br />
without a mustache looks a little boyish... suddenly the beard appeared.<br />
In the East just the opposite has been the case. Buddha is never painted with a beard, neither is Krishna or<br />
Mahavira, neither is Rama or Patanjali... nobody. Why? because the Eastern idea is that these people were<br />
so young, spiritually young, that it is better to let them appear young from the outside too. <strong>The</strong> outside should<br />
represent the inside.<br />
Buddha became very old, he died when he was eighty-two, but still he is never depicted as having a beard. Jesus<br />
died when he was only thirty-three, but the beard appeared after two centuries. Still his face was not sad. After<br />
two centuries even that face changed. He became more and more sad as if he were carrying the whole burden<br />
of the earth. Now they have changed him into the savior; he is carrying the cross. He has come to deliver you<br />
from your sufferings, he is taking your sufferings on himself. And they have falsified this beautiful man who used<br />
to enjoy the company of very ordinary people carpenters, laborers, gardeners, fishermen, gamblers, prostitutes,<br />
drunkards, tax collectors, every kind of people even tax collectors! <strong>The</strong>y are making him more and more abstract;<br />
he is losing his earthliness. He is becoming more and more a concept rather than a real human being; he is losing<br />
his humanity. He is no more the Son of Man, he is becoming only the Son of God.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se are the sad people who are projecting their sadness on him. <strong>The</strong>y say he never laughed I can’t believe<br />
it. I can believe a far more impossible thing....<br />
<strong>The</strong> followers of Zarathustra say that he laughed the very moment he was born I can believe that, that he<br />
was born laughing. It looks absolutely impossible no child is ever born laughing but it has something beautiful<br />
about it. Zarathustra getting out of the womb, laughing, appeals to me more. Such a joyous spirit! That’s why