THE DHAMMAPADA: THE WAY OF THE BUDDHA, VOL. 9-12 The ...
THE DHAMMAPADA: THE WAY OF THE BUDDHA, VOL. 9-12 The ...
THE DHAMMAPADA: THE WAY OF THE BUDDHA, VOL. 9-12 The ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>THE</strong> <strong>DHAMMAPADA</strong>: <strong>THE</strong> <strong>WAY</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>BUDDHA</strong>, <strong>VOL</strong>. 9-<strong>12</strong> 353<br />
or disagree. I will not believe or disbelieve. I will not be a Catholic or a communist, I will not be a Hindu or a<br />
Mohammedan. I will simply not follow any ideology.” Because, whoever you follow, you will be gathering dust<br />
around yourself. Stop following.<br />
Here, being with me, you are not my followers, remember it. Friends certainly, but not followers. You are in a<br />
love affair with me, but it is not a question of following. And my work here is not to teach you something, but to<br />
help you to discover yourself. Just drop all knowledge. It hurts because you have carried that knowledge for so<br />
long and you have been bragging so much about that knowledge your degrees, MAs and PhDs and DLitts, and<br />
you have been bragging about all those degrees. And suddenly I am saying to you: Drop all that nonsense.<br />
Just be as simple as a child. Just be again a child as you were born, as God sent you into this world. In that<br />
mirrorlike state you will be able to reflect that which is. Innocence is the door to knowing. Knowledge is the<br />
barrier and innocence is the bridge.<br />
<strong>The</strong> second question:<br />
Question 2<br />
BELOVED MASTER, CAN I ALSO BECOME A GAUTAMA <strong>THE</strong> <strong>BUDDHA</strong>?<br />
Govind, yes and no. Yes because buddhahood is nobody’s personal possession. Gautama does not have it as<br />
a personal attribute; he is not the owner of it and he is not the only buddha. <strong>The</strong>re have been many buddhas<br />
before him, there have been many buddhas after him. <strong>The</strong> word ’buddha’ simply means the awakened one.<br />
You are asleep. Naturally, if you can be asleep you can wake up. One who is capable of sleep is also capable of<br />
waking up; the very phenomenon of sleep implies the capacity to wake up. If you are incapable of waking up you<br />
will be incapable of sleeping too; they are two sides of the same coin.<br />
So, Govind, if you can sleep, if you can dream, you can wake up, you can be a buddha. Hence I say yes but you<br />
cannot be a Gautama the Buddha; Gautama you cannot be. You can be Govind the Buddha, but not Gautama<br />
the Buddha; that is not possible. Nature never repeats. <strong>The</strong>y say history repeats and it certainly repeats because<br />
history consists of stupid human beings. What else can they do? <strong>The</strong>y can only repeat. But nature never repeats;<br />
it never creates the same person again, the same form again. Nature is immensely innovative.<br />
That’s the meaning when we say God is a creator. A creator is never repetitive, he never creates the same<br />
painting again and again. He goes on creating something new, he is always on a new venture.<br />
Govind, God has never created another person like you and will never create another person like you. He loves<br />
individuality, he loves uniqueness. That’s his way of showing respect to you, tremendous respect. And it is not<br />
only so with human beings: go into the garden, watch the leaves minutely you will not find even two leaves<br />
exactly the same. Not on the whole of the earth will you find two leaves exactly the same, or two pebbles exactly<br />
the same on all the seashores.<br />
Everything is unique, everything has its own signature. Just as your thumb is unique and its print is unique<br />
there is nobody else who has the same print what to say about your soul? Even about such small details God<br />
is so careful or you can say ”nature,” if ”God” has lost its appeal for you. If the word ’God’ has lost its appeal<br />
for you, ’nature’ is as beautiful, or ’existence’, or whatsoever you want. Buddha likes the word ’dhamma’ the<br />
universal law. Lao Tzu loves the word ’Tao’ the harmony of existence, the inner order.<br />
<strong>The</strong> universe is not a chaos, that much is certain. Whether there is a God or not is irrelevant, the universe is not<br />
a chaos. That’s why we call it a universe. It has a certain unity, hence ”universe,” otherwise we would have called<br />
it a ”multiverse.” It is not a chaos, there is an order running inside it, a thread which joins everything together.<br />
Even the smallest grass blade is joined to the biggest star. Nothing is separate, and yet everything is unique<br />
and individual. This is the tremendous beauty of existence: it loves and respects the individual, it nourishes the<br />
individual.<br />
Hence, Govind, you cannot be Gautama the Buddha, but there is no need to be Gautama the Buddha. That<br />
will be ugly, that will be imitative. Never try to imitate because then you will always be only a carbon copy and<br />
never something original. And unless you are something original you are not using your life’s opportunity to its<br />
maximum, you are wasting it.<br />
Don’t be a Christian be a christ. And don’t be a Buddhist be a buddha. <strong>The</strong> Christian is trying to be like<br />
Jesus Christ, the Buddhist is trying to be like Gautam Buddha, and this is not possible. What is possible is that<br />
you will become an imitator, an actor. And you can act beautifully. You can walk like Buddha, you can talk like<br />
Buddha, you can sit like Buddha. You can use the same words, the same language, the same gestures, but still<br />
deep down you will be Govind, not Gautam. And you will know it! That all that you are doing is just on the<br />
outside. And it is ugly because it will create a kind of hypocrisy in you.<br />
Hence all Christians are hypocrites and all Buddhists are hypocrites. All followers are bound to be hypocrites<br />
because they are divided persons, split persons. And whatsoever they show is only on the surface, and whatsoever