THE DHAMMAPADA: THE WAY OF THE BUDDHA, VOL. 9-12 The ...
THE DHAMMAPADA: THE WAY OF THE BUDDHA, VOL. 9-12 The ...
THE DHAMMAPADA: THE WAY OF THE BUDDHA, VOL. 9-12 The ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
372 <strong>THE</strong> <strong>DHAMMAPADA</strong>: <strong>THE</strong> <strong>WAY</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>BUDDHA</strong>, <strong>VOL</strong>. 9-<strong>12</strong><br />
Three hours passed and then the sun was rising, and Wu’s face was transformed. He had a new beauty, a new<br />
grace. Bodhidharma laughed and he said, ”Now, open your eyes. You have not been able to find it... so I have<br />
finished it forever.”<br />
Wu opened his eyes, touched Bodhidharma’s feet and said, ”Master, you have not done anything and yet you<br />
have finished it.” That’s the miracle of a master; he never does a thing, and yet the ultimate miracle happens in<br />
his presence. His presence is the miracle, his presence has the magical quality.<br />
Anand Vedant, you need not drop the ego. Just look in, search for where it is first find it. Don’t worry about<br />
self-nature right now. Just go in, search for the ego, and you will not find it; instead you will find your self-nature,<br />
luminous, fragrant like a lotus flower. One never comes across such beauty anywhere else. It is the most beautiful<br />
experience of life. And once you have seen your own lotus of light, your own lotus blossoming, the ego is finished<br />
forever. <strong>The</strong>n you will not ask such meaningless questions.<br />
”How to distinguish,” you say, ”between what is the ego and what is my true nature?”<br />
Either the ego is there, then the true nature is not known; or the true nature is known, then there is no ego left.<br />
You cannot have both, hence you cannot make any distinctions; you cannot distinguish them, they can’t both be<br />
present together. Only one can be present.<br />
Right now, whatsoever you are is ego, so don’t be worried about distinguishing. If there were no ego the<br />
question would not have arisen at all. Self-nature knows no questions, self-nature is ecstasy, not a problem.<br />
<strong>The</strong> second question:<br />
Question 2<br />
BELOVED MASTER, PLEASE TELL ME WHAT <strong>THE</strong> DIFFERENCE IS BETWEEN SURRENDERING<br />
TO A MASTER AND FOLLOWING A MASTER?<br />
Edward Kiefer, there is a great difference. <strong>The</strong>y are poles apart. Surrendering to a master is something of the<br />
heart, it is a love affair, it is not an intellectual conviction. It is not that you are convinced intellectually that<br />
what the master is saying is right. It is not philosophical. What the master is saying may be absurd in fact, it<br />
is bound to be absurd, because he speaks from a totally different kind of vision, from the peak where opposites<br />
meet, where the ultimate synthesis has happened, where life and death are one, where man and woman are one,<br />
where negative and positive are one. Hence whatsoever he says is bound to be paradoxical.<br />
Surrendering to a master means you have felt his grace. It is not a question of his knowledgeability. He may<br />
not be knowledgeable at all. Jesus was not knowledgeable. Mohammed was not even able to read or write, he was<br />
not even able to sign his own name. But thousands fell in deep love with the man. He had no logical acumen. If<br />
you go into the Koran you will not find great philosophy simple statements which can be refuted very easily. But<br />
the man must have had something totally different. So many people gravitated towards him. Now you cannot<br />
see gravitation; it is an energy, it is a force, invisible. It is a communion, heart-to-heart. <strong>The</strong> master’s presence<br />
overwhelms you, then surrender happens.<br />
It is not something that you do. You cannot do surrender, remember. Surrender done is not surrender at<br />
all, because you can withdraw. Any day you can say, ”I take back my surrender.” Surrender is something that<br />
happens. Sometimes it happens even in spite of you, you never wanted it to happen, you resisted it. People resist<br />
to the very end; when it becomes impossible to resist, only then do they surrender, because surrender goes against<br />
the ego, it shatters your ego. <strong>The</strong> very idea of surrendering to someone is against your whole upbringing, your<br />
whole education, your whole psychology. You are brought up with the idea of having a strong ego.<br />
Surrender means you are dropping your whole upbringing, you are pushing aside all your knowledge, you are<br />
bypassing your mind, you are allowing the heart to say ”Yes!” a total yes. It is a happening, not a doing. It is<br />
just like falling in love.<br />
What is the difference between falling in love and marriage, an arranged marriage? Exactly that is the difference<br />
between surrendering to a master and following a master. Surrendering to a master is like falling in love. <strong>The</strong><br />
force is irresistible. You are behaving like a madman. <strong>The</strong> master is mad, now you are becoming mad. <strong>The</strong> master<br />
is like a flame, and you are moving towards the flame like a moth, to your own death.<br />
Following a master is a safe phenomenon, like an arranged marriage. You are moving on safe ground. You<br />
think about everything about the family of the woman or the man, about their economic status, about their<br />
social prestige, about everything except love. It is a calculated phenomenon. <strong>The</strong>re is no risk in it. And not to<br />
take any chances you go to the astrologer so that he can even predict the future, how things will be going in the<br />
future: ”Will I be sailing safely?”<br />
You make everything safe before you take the plunge. It is not a jump, it is a calculated step. And that’s<br />
what following a master is. It is intellectual, it is of the mind, it is of the head. You are trying to understand<br />
intellectually, logically what he is saying. Does it appeal to you?