THE DHAMMAPADA: THE WAY OF THE BUDDHA, VOL. 9-12 The ...
THE DHAMMAPADA: THE WAY OF THE BUDDHA, VOL. 9-12 The ...
THE DHAMMAPADA: THE WAY OF THE BUDDHA, VOL. 9-12 The ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>THE</strong> <strong>DHAMMAPADA</strong>: <strong>THE</strong> <strong>WAY</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>BUDDHA</strong>, <strong>VOL</strong>. 9-<strong>12</strong> 35<br />
communist. Slowly, slowly you will be aware that you are not any thought you are not mind at all. You are a pure<br />
witness. <strong>The</strong> experience of pure witnessing is the experience of total freedom, but it is an inward phenomenon.<br />
And a man who is inwardly totally free has no hankering to be outwardly free. He is capable of accepting nature<br />
as it is.<br />
Yvonne, create inner freedom through witnessing. Sannyas is only for the inner freedom. And live out of inner<br />
freedom and then you will be able to see the interdependence on the outside. It is beautiful and it is a blessing.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is no need to rebel against it. Relax into it, surrender to it. And remember: only a person who is really<br />
free can surrender.<br />
<strong>The</strong> last question:<br />
Question 7<br />
BELOVED MASTER, I ALSO THINK THAT A MAN <strong>OF</strong> KNOWLEDGE IS BETTER THAN AN IGNO-<br />
RANT MAN. AM I ABSOLUTELY WRONG?<br />
Sanatan, a man of knowledge is a totally different phenomenon. I was saying that the man of knowledge and<br />
the knowledgeable man are not the same. <strong>The</strong> man of knowledge is what a buddha is: one who knows. But<br />
the knowledgeable man is not a buddha; he does not know. He has accumulated great information, but that<br />
information is borrowed. It is from the scriptures, from the books, from others. He has not experienced it; it is<br />
about and about. He can talk, he can write, he can sermonize, but he knows nothing. He talks about God; he<br />
has no idea what God is. He has no glimpse even what to say about experience.<br />
<strong>The</strong> priests all over the world of all the religions are knowledgeable people. Jesus knows, but the pope is not a<br />
man of knowledge. He is a knowledgeable man, he has great information. He can quote scriptures.<br />
One of the great thinkers of the West was Ingersoll. Whenever he would deliver discourses and he was a great<br />
orator too he would make a mysterious sign in the air with his finger before he would start speaking. And when<br />
he would end, after that again he would make something with his fingers some very mysterious thing in the air.<br />
He was asked again and again, but he would laugh and he would not answer.<br />
When he was dying somebody asked, ”Now please tell us, otherwise we will be always curious and wondering<br />
what were you doing your whole life? Is there some magic in it? Why do you make some mysterious signs before<br />
you speak and then again when you end?”<br />
He said, ”<strong>The</strong>re is no magic in it, but I could not tell it before. Now I can tell it. Before I started my speech<br />
I was making the sign of inverted commas, and after I ended I had to close the inverted commas. I was saying<br />
to myself and to you too that it is all just quotation, it is not my experience. <strong>The</strong> whole thing is borrowed it is<br />
within inverted commas.”<br />
That is a knowledgeable man. But Ingersoll is sincere, at least honest. <strong>The</strong> knowledgeable man is not better<br />
than the ignorant man, remember, Sanatan. <strong>The</strong> man of knowledge is certainly better than the ignorant man, of<br />
course, obviously, but the same is not true about the knowledgeable man. <strong>The</strong> knowledgeable man is even worse<br />
than the ignorant man. <strong>The</strong> ignorant man at least knows that he is ignorant; he has no pretensions, he has no<br />
facade. <strong>The</strong> knowledgeable man has a beautiful facade, a mask.<br />
And the problem is: if you go on deceiving others, slowly, slowly you become autohypnotized. You start thinking<br />
that you know. But there is no difference. <strong>The</strong> knowledgeable person is only on the surface painted with great<br />
knowledge and the ignorant person is not painted; he is raw. <strong>The</strong> knowledgeable person is a little polished. But<br />
deep down they are the same person. Both will be greedy, both will be full of lust, both will be full of anger, both<br />
will be full of ego. <strong>The</strong>ir lives will be nothing but ego trips. <strong>The</strong>ir lives will be nothing but sexuality, violence,<br />
greed, jealousy, possessiveness. <strong>The</strong>re will be no difference at all.<br />
Sanatan, remember, you have to become a knower on your own. If you quote me, that is knowledgeability; if<br />
you know it on your own, that is knowing. And knowing brings freedom, knowing brings truth. Knowledgeability<br />
is respectable; you become an expert. <strong>The</strong> more you know, the more people think you are great, but deep down<br />
you go on living the same animal kind of life, no difference at all or maybe only one difference: you are a bigger<br />
hypocrite than the ignorant man.<br />
Norman Bush had a terrible stutter. His wife Rose suggested that he go and see a specialist. Reluctantly he<br />
was persuaded to visit the best man in Harley Street who told him, ”Well, Mr. Bush, there is only one thing we<br />
can do about this stutter of yours. You see, the problem is your balls are too big. However, we should be able to<br />
transplant a smaller pair. That would undoubtedly cure your ailment.”<br />
Norman was given a week to think it over and reluctantly accepted to undergo surgery. When he came out,<br />
his speech fully restored, his wife was delighted. <strong>The</strong>n came those long nights when Rose was eager and Norman<br />
showed no interest. As the weeks went by she grew more anxious and frustrated.