THE DHAMMAPADA: THE WAY OF THE BUDDHA, VOL. 9-12 The ...
THE DHAMMAPADA: THE WAY OF THE BUDDHA, VOL. 9-12 The ...
THE DHAMMAPADA: THE WAY OF THE BUDDHA, VOL. 9-12 The ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
68 <strong>THE</strong> <strong>DHAMMAPADA</strong>: <strong>THE</strong> <strong>WAY</strong> <strong>OF</strong> <strong>THE</strong> <strong>BUDDHA</strong>, <strong>VOL</strong>. 9-<strong>12</strong><br />
far below in the hierarchy. That I cannot do because I see the same phenomenon happening in Buddha and the<br />
same experience in Jesus. I am not helping Indians’ ego in any possible way I am doing just the opposite. <strong>The</strong>y<br />
cannot crowd at the gate to come in.<br />
What I am trying here is not something of the past; it belongs to the future. So only a few Indians will be able<br />
to come to me a few Indians who are capable of rising above their Indian mind, very rare individuals who are<br />
ready to rise with me above nationality, above race, above all kinds of egoistic attitudes. <strong>The</strong>y are here, but they<br />
are here because they are also no longer Indians.<br />
Indians believe that they know, they are very knowledgeable. Naturally it is an ancient country; you need<br />
not read the scriptures, the scriptures are in the atmosphere. And my idea is that the knowledgeable person can<br />
never be religious. And up to now India has believed in the knowledgeable person the pundit, the scholar, the<br />
professor. And my effort is to help you become more and more childlike, more innocent, full of wonder not full of<br />
knowledge, full of awe not full of information. <strong>The</strong>re is no need to read the Vedas because anyway ninety-nine<br />
percent of the Vedas is absolutely rubbish! Now this hurts the Indians. Only one percent is beautiful; you have<br />
to be very choosy.<br />
<strong>The</strong> same is the case with other scriptures of the world. You look at the Bible, look at the Old Testament;<br />
ninety-nine percent is just rubbish. It would be better if we got rid of that rubbish so only diamonds can shine<br />
forth. Otherwise the pebbles are so many, the diamonds are lost. But no no Jew will be ready to drop anything<br />
out of the Old Testament. And the same is the case with the New Testament, and the same is the case more so<br />
with the Koran.<br />
I have many Mohammedan sannyasins. <strong>The</strong>y go on asking me when I am going to speak on the Koran, and I<br />
go on postponing it for the simple reason that there is not much in it to speak on. Very rarely do you come across<br />
a line one can manage to speak about in a beautiful way. Otherwise, just very ordinary statements....<br />
But the reason is, in those days everything was written in the religious scriptures: history, geography, mythology.<br />
That was the only way. <strong>The</strong> old religious scriptures are like Encyclopedia Britannica; they are the encyclopedias<br />
of the old days. Everything is written, whatsoever was happening in those days and whatsoever was thought<br />
important. It may have been important in those days; now it is irrelevant.<br />
And even when I speak on Buddha, Mahavira, Krishna, I speak in an absolutely nontraditional way. I speak<br />
out of my own experience, I am not a commentator. I love Buddha because I have known the same light, I have<br />
experienced the same truth. So when I comment on Buddha it is not a commentary. Buddha’s statements are<br />
only excuses, just pegs; I go on hanging myself on those pegs.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Indian mind is very much against that. <strong>The</strong>y think I am distorting. <strong>The</strong>y think I should comment according<br />
to the scriptures. I am commenting according to my consciousness, not according to any scripture. And when I<br />
see something which cannot be said by a buddha I simply drop it, I don’t comment on it.<br />
I know what buddhahood is! I go on creating Buddha again. That is resisted very much. <strong>The</strong>y would like<br />
me to be just a historian, a commentator, a scholar. <strong>The</strong>y would like me to quote their scriptures, refer to their<br />
scriptures. I never refer, I never quote. In my books you will not find any footnotes. I don’t believe in all that<br />
nonsense. I speak out of my heart. I love Buddha, I love Jesus. I speak, I use their statements as grounds to take<br />
off, that’s all just jumping boards. It goes against the Indian approach, Indian scholarship.<br />
Gardiner, because my message is universal it will appeal only to those people who are universal, who don’t<br />
belong to any country anymore, to any religion, to any church. Yes, you are right. You say, ”Is it only for those<br />
without a religion?”<br />
Yes, it is for those who are without a religion, without a nation, without a race; it is only for those liberated<br />
ones. It is for the new generation. <strong>The</strong> new generation is courageous; it has dropped much of the load that people<br />
have been carrying for centuries. Only then can there be a communion between me and you.<br />
And you can see this is a universal gathering. People from at least forty countries are here. Except the Chinese<br />
and the Russians except the communist bloc you will find people from every country here. And even in Russia<br />
the orange people are starting to work underground. Small cells have started functioning. People are meeting<br />
really in underground basements, meditating. A few people even have become sannyasins. It is very difficult to<br />
send them malas and names, but we have found ways and they have found ways. <strong>The</strong>y cannot wear orange in the<br />
open.<br />
One woman who has become a sannyasin wrote to me, ”What to do?” I said, ”Use red instead of orange. Wear<br />
red and tell people that you love communism so much that you cannot resist the temptation of wearing red!” She<br />
loved the idea. She said, ”This is beautiful!”