20.01.2015 Views

Academic Calendar - Fisheries and Marine Institute - Memorial ...

Academic Calendar - Fisheries and Marine Institute - Memorial ...

Academic Calendar - Fisheries and Marine Institute - Memorial ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ACADEMIC POLICIES AND REGULATIONS<br />

iv)<br />

severe back pain over a two month period would likely have<br />

a more adverse effect on studies than a single episode of<br />

back pain requiring bed rest for a week.)<br />

the fitness of the student to resume studies (it is in the<br />

student’s best interest not to return to his/her studies<br />

prematurely.)The <strong>Institute</strong> respects the privacy of all<br />

students <strong>and</strong>, therefore, the confidentiality of all material<br />

contained in medical notes.<br />

• Students claiming bereavement as grounds for an appeal<br />

must provide proof of death <strong>and</strong> evidence of a close personal<br />

relationship between themselves <strong>and</strong> the deceased.<br />

• The members of the Appeals Committee do require substantial<br />

information about the reasons for the appeal in order to make<br />

their decisions. However, the committee also recognizes the<br />

student’s rights to confidentiality. With this in mind, a student<br />

may discuss the reasons for his or her appeal with the <strong>Institute</strong><br />

counselor, who, with the student’s permission <strong>and</strong> provided<br />

sufficient reasons exist, may then write a letter to the committee<br />

confirming that there were sufficient grounds for an appeal<br />

without disclosing the special personal <strong>and</strong> confidential details<br />

of the case.<br />

• In cases where a student wishes to appeal a decision of the<br />

Appeals Committee of the <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> <strong>Academic</strong> Council,<br />

the appeal shall be directed to the Executive Committee of<br />

<strong>Academic</strong> Council. The Executive Committee shall determine if<br />

there is any further evidence or grounds to amend the previous<br />

decisions of the Appeals Committee.<br />

• In all cases, written appeals must be made no later than two<br />

weeks after the decision of the Appeals Committee is made<br />

known to the student. Failure to do so will result in the forfeiture<br />

of the right to appeal.<br />

20. ACADEMIC MISCONDUCT<br />

These rules on <strong>Academic</strong> Misconduct apply to students<br />

registered in courses in any non-degree <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> program.<br />

Students enrolled in the degree-level courses should consult<br />

the <strong>Memorial</strong> University <strong>Calendar</strong> for regulations governing<br />

undergraduate <strong>and</strong> graduate degree students.<br />

20.1 General Procedures<br />

20.1.1 Reporting Offenses:<br />

The <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> values academic honesty highly. When any<br />

member of the <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Institute</strong> community (faculty, staff, student)<br />

has reason to believe that an academic offense has been<br />

committed, he/she is obliged to report the matter verbally without<br />

delay to the appropriate person immediately.<br />

In the case of a final examination, the appropriate person shall be<br />

the chief invigilator. In the case of a classroom test, assignment,<br />

project, or other academic work, the appropriate person shall<br />

be the person for whom the work is being done or the person<br />

supervising the work. The person for whom the work is being<br />

done shall take immediate action to stop the offense, if possible.<br />

He/she shall promptly inform the student’s School Head of the<br />

offense <strong>and</strong> the action taken.<br />

In the case of a final examination, the report shall be made to<br />

the Supervisor of Examinations who will prepare a report to the<br />

appropriate School Head once the circumstances of the matter<br />

have been determined. A verbal report shall be confirmed in<br />

writing as soon as possible.<br />

All references to School Head in this policy refer to the Head of<br />

the School with responsibility for the program of study in which<br />

the student accused of academic misconduct is registered.<br />

20.1.2 Resolution of Allegations:<br />

1. In the case of work, other than final exams, which<br />

constitutes less than 10% of the final grade for the course in<br />

question, an instructor may determine that a student may be<br />

guilty of either cheating or plagiarism. Such an offense shall<br />

be considered a minor offense. In such cases, an instructor<br />

may apply a grade reduction penalty up to <strong>and</strong> including the<br />

reduction of the grade for the portion of work in question to 0%.<br />

In such cases, the instructor shall submit a brief written report<br />

to the School Head documenting the nature of the incident,<br />

the evidence used to determine that the student cheated,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the action taken to resolve the issue. For minor offenses,<br />

an instructor may choose to have such incidents of alleged<br />

academic misconduct resolved by the student’s School Head. In<br />

all cases other than those resolved in step one above, the faculty<br />

member, witness to the event or, in the case of final examinations,<br />

the Supervisor of Examinations, shall prepare <strong>and</strong> submit a written<br />

report to the School Head.<br />

2. The School Head shall interview each person involved<br />

separately to establish the facts of the matter <strong>and</strong> the appropriate<br />

steps to follow. Those to be interviewed shall include the<br />

student(s) in question, the instructor for the course in question,<br />

the witness to the act of academic misconduct, <strong>and</strong>, in the case<br />

of final examinations, the Chief Invigilator <strong>and</strong> the Supervisor of<br />

Examinations. All interviews <strong>and</strong> the review of all documentation<br />

shall be completed <strong>and</strong> a decision shall be made by the School<br />

Head within ten (10) business days of the occurrence of the<br />

alleged offence.<br />

3. If upon completion of step 2 above the School Head<br />

determines that there is not enough evidence to determine that a<br />

student is guilty of an act of academic misconduct, the matter is<br />

resolved <strong>and</strong> the student <strong>and</strong> instructor are notified in writing of<br />

the outcome.<br />

4. If, upon completion of step 2 above, the School Head<br />

determines that there is enough evidence to determine that an<br />

act of academic misconduct was committed by a student, he<br />

or she will assess the circumstances <strong>and</strong> severity of the act of<br />

dishonesty <strong>and</strong> apply the appropriate penalties, as outlined below<br />

in the section concerning Penalties. The School Head shall notify<br />

the student in writing of the outcome of the case within five (5)<br />

business days of his/her decision.<br />

20.2 <strong>Academic</strong> Offenses<br />

Students who commit acts of academic misconduct, including<br />

but not limited to the following offenses, shall be subject to<br />

disciplinary action by the <strong>Marine</strong> <strong>Institute</strong>.<br />

20.2.1 Cheating:<br />

For assignment, tests, projects, reports, laboratories <strong>and</strong><br />

examinations, cheating means copying from another student’s<br />

work, or allowing a student to copy from one’s own work;<br />

36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!