11.03.2015 Views

Physiology and Molecular Biology of Stress ... - KHAM PHA MOI

Physiology and Molecular Biology of Stress ... - KHAM PHA MOI

Physiology and Molecular Biology of Stress ... - KHAM PHA MOI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

56<br />

Z . Dajic<br />

General inhibition <strong>of</strong> shoot growth with continued root growth has been considered<br />

as a morphological adaptation to salt or water stress (Saab et al., 1990). An<br />

increase <strong>of</strong> root/shoot ratio during the vegetation season was observed in the halophyte<br />

Suaeda maritima, which might be a consequence <strong>of</strong> both ageing <strong>and</strong> increased<br />

soil salinity (Dajic et al., 1997b).<br />

6.1. Growth <strong>of</strong> Crops under Salt <strong>Stress</strong><br />

There are great varietal differences in plant growth responses to salinity, depending on<br />

genotypic differences in rates <strong>of</strong> salt uptake, transport, accumulation <strong>and</strong> distribution<br />

within the plant. For example, the shoot dry weight <strong>of</strong> three oat cultivars progressively<br />

decreased under increasing concentrations <strong>of</strong> salinity (Dajic, unpublished data). The<br />

most evident differences in growth responses to salinity were observed at the treatment<br />

<strong>of</strong> 100 mM NaCl, whereas at higher salt concentrations a considerable reduction<br />

<strong>of</strong> shoot dry weight (about three to five times lower at 150 mM <strong>and</strong> 300 mM, respectively,<br />

than those <strong>of</strong> the control plants) occurred in all tested cultivars (Figure 4).<br />

Figure 4. Growth reduction <strong>of</strong> oat cultivars (cv. Rajac, Slavuj <strong>and</strong> Lovcen) caused<br />

by increasing salt concentrations<br />

The salt tolerance <strong>of</strong> crop species, including cereals, forage crops, fruit crops<br />

<strong>and</strong> vegetables (Table 3) is conventionally expressed (Maas <strong>and</strong> H<strong>of</strong>fman, 1977) in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> relative yield (Y r<br />

, i.e. the percentage <strong>of</strong> the yield <strong>of</strong> the crop grown under saline<br />

conditions relative to that in non-saline conditions), threshold salinity value (a), that is,<br />

the maximum soil salinity that does not reduce yields below those produced under nonsaline<br />

conditions, <strong>and</strong> slope (b), the relative reduction per unit salinity increase from<br />

threshold (soil salinity is expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> EC e<br />

), as follows:<br />

Y r<br />

= 100 – b (Ec e<br />

– a) (1)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!