10.07.2015 Views

Kristian Williams - Our Enemies in Blue - Police and Power in America

Kristian Williams - Our Enemies in Blue - Police and Power in America

Kristian Williams - Our Enemies in Blue - Police and Power in America

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1'5olire (Berkeley, CA: Center for Research on Crim<strong>in</strong>alJustice, 1975); Daniel N<strong>in</strong>a, "Popular Justice <strong>and</strong> the 'Appropriation' of the State Monopoly onthe Def<strong>in</strong>ition of Justice <strong>and</strong> Order: The Case of the Anti-Crime Committees <strong>in</strong> Port Elizaheth,"<strong>in</strong> The Othrr Law: Non-Stale Order<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> South Africa, cd. \X'ilfi'ied Sch:irf <strong>and</strong> DanielN<strong>in</strong>a (Lundsdowne: JUTA Law. 200 1); <strong>and</strong> Dennis R. Longmire, "A Popular Justice System: ARadical Alternative to the Traditional Crim<strong>in</strong>al Justice System," Contemporary Crises 5 (1981).Longmire proposes pragmatic alternatives to police, courts, <strong>and</strong> prisons. His recommendarionsare as remarkable for their Simplicity as for their radicalism.6 For more on this po<strong>in</strong>t, see: George Orwell, "Thoughts on James Burnham," <strong>in</strong> Shoot<strong>in</strong>g anElepbant <strong>and</strong> Other Essays (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 19 50), 122- 14H.7 "The repressive police <strong>in</strong>stitution, so necessary for the ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of capitalism, simply could notperform any social funcrions at all without its legitimat<strong>in</strong>g crime-fight<strong>in</strong>g role." Sidney L. Harflng,Foltcmg a Llass "ociety: j he Hxperience of <strong>America</strong>n Cities, 1865-1915 (New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press, 1983),246. Put differently-"The threat of crime, as evidenced by themyriad constructed images <strong>and</strong> narratives projected ... serves only as the pretext tor the <strong>in</strong>stallationof a grow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly complex enterprise of social control." Victor E. Kappeler <strong>and</strong>Peter B. Kr:lska, "A. Textual Critique of Comrrlunity Polic<strong>in</strong>g: <strong>Police</strong> Adaptioi1 to High v1odelnlLy,))PoliC<strong>in</strong>g: An International Journal of <strong>Police</strong> Strategies & Management 21:2 (1998): 293,8 My criticisms of community polic<strong>in</strong>g appear <strong>in</strong> chapter 9.9 Nikolas Rose, "Government <strong>and</strong> Control," British Journal of Crim<strong>in</strong>ology 40:2 (20DD): 329.David E. Pearson argues along similar l<strong>in</strong>es: "To earn the appellation 'community.' it seemsto me, groups must be able to exert moral suasion <strong>and</strong> extract a measure of compliance fromtheir members. That is, communities are necessarily-<strong>in</strong>deed, by def<strong>in</strong>ition-coercive as wellas moral, threaten<strong>in</strong>g their members with the stick of sanctions if they stray, offer<strong>in</strong>g them thecarrot of certa<strong>in</strong>ty <strong>and</strong> stabilitv if they don't." David E, Pearsoll, "Community <strong>and</strong> Sociology,"Society 32:5 (July-August 1995) [database: Academic Search Elite, accessed March 26, 2003].10 Amatai Etioni, The New Golden Rule: Community <strong>and</strong> Morality <strong>in</strong> a Democratic Society (NewYork: Basic Books, 1996), 127.11 Carl Klockars puts the po<strong>in</strong>t more forcefully: "Sociologically, the concept of community impliesa group of people with a common history, common beliefs <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>gs, a sense of themselvesas 'us' <strong>and</strong> outsiders as 'them,' <strong>and</strong> often. but not always, a shared territory. Relationshipsof community are different from relationships of society. Community relationships are basedupon status not contract, manners not morals, norms not laws, underst<strong>and</strong><strong>in</strong>gs not regulations.Noth<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> fact, is more different from community than those relationships that characterize12 Ibid,most of modern urban life." K1ockars, "Rhetoric," 435.13 For a discussion of gang suppression activities <strong>and</strong> their impacr on communities of color, see:Felix M. Padilla, Gangs as an <strong>America</strong>n Enterprise (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press,296

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!