11.07.2015 Views

Natural Resources and Violent Conflict - WaterWiki.net

Natural Resources and Violent Conflict - WaterWiki.net

Natural Resources and Violent Conflict - WaterWiki.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

222 philippe le billon• Activities associated with conflicts <strong>and</strong> human rights abuses areprohibited (for example, prohibition of corruption or forced labor).• Actors described as belligerents or war criminals are excludedfrom legitimate trade (for example, UN targeted sanctions on rebelleaders).Regulatory instruments range from purely voluntary measuresdesigned <strong>and</strong> adopted by resource businesses to m<strong>and</strong>atory regulationsimposed by intergovernmental bodies under international law:• Prescriptive legal instruments creating a disincentive for an offense(for example, m<strong>and</strong>atory sanctions)• Market-based legal instruments creating an incentive for compliance(for example, tax rebates or market access <strong>and</strong> rewards linked toethical business practices)• Voluntary approaches creating an incentive for compliance(for example, corporate code-of-conduct <strong>and</strong> voluntary productcertification)• Normative pressure instruments (for example, advocacy campaignsby civil society groups).Each instrument has its own advantages <strong>and</strong> disadvantages, whichvary according to the type of target. It is often argued that voluntary instrumentshave the advantage of being internally defined by businesses<strong>and</strong> thus represent a greater ownership of policy <strong>and</strong> better adaptationto specific conditions than m<strong>and</strong>atory regulations. They can also offerthe advantage of cutting across national jurisdictions <strong>and</strong> being globalin scope when applied across a multinational company, its subsidiaries,<strong>and</strong> business partners. Yet voluntary instruments can be limited inscope—generally concentrating on core activities—<strong>and</strong> frequently lackaccountability through independent auditing <strong>and</strong> enforcement. Theyare also unlikely to act as a deterrent, unless clearly linked to marketincentives. Although generally slow <strong>and</strong> dependent on effective enforcement,m<strong>and</strong>atory regulations have undeniable advantages, consideringthat:• Opportunistic belligerents <strong>and</strong> business people can be motivatedsolely by profits, whatever the cost to populations in conflict-affectedregions.• The absence of a level playing field within a sector or marketplaces legitimate businesses following “pro-peace” best practices at adisadvantage compared with their less scrupulous competitors.• A constraining “wartime” regulatory framework, such as tradesanctions, may motivate businesses to take a more active role inpromoting peace.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!