Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> NigeriaCHAPTER 8: GENDER AND BASIC EDUCATION8.1 Introducti<strong>on</strong>This chapter looks at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> gender and educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria. As elsewhere <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> world, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>gender focus <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> is predom<strong>in</strong>antly <strong>on</strong> girls and women; <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re has been little c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>thus far <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> boys and men. This is reflected <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Nati<strong>on</strong>al Policy <strong>on</strong> Gender <strong>in</strong> Basic Educati<strong>on</strong> (FME2007a), which identifies <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> follow<strong>in</strong>g factors as hav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>hibited female participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong>:lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> political commitment; poor plann<strong>in</strong>g and management; gender-<strong>in</strong>sensitive teach<strong>in</strong>g materialsand a gender-bl<strong>in</strong>d curriculum; girl-unfriendly school <strong>in</strong>frastructure, such as lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> separate toilets forgirls and boys; skewed male–female teacher ratios; gender-biased attitudes toward girls; sexualharassment; poverty; and cultural factors such as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> err<strong>on</strong>eous <strong>in</strong>terpretati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> religious teach<strong>in</strong>g. Inadditi<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Federal M<strong>in</strong>istry for Women’s Affairs and Social Development (FMWASD) has produced acompendium <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> best practices <strong>on</strong> improv<strong>in</strong>g girl-child educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria (FMWASD, 2010).There is a sizeable body <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> that predom<strong>in</strong>antly c<strong>on</strong>siders girls’ access to school<strong>in</strong>g, whichderives from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> GEP and Transform<strong>in</strong>g Educati<strong>on</strong> for Girls <strong>in</strong> Nigeria and Tanzania (TEGINT) projects, aswell as from a few <strong>in</strong>dependent studies.8.2 Gender disparitiesThe focus <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> many <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> gender <strong>in</strong>itiatives, driven by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>ternati<strong>on</strong>al development gender agenda, asepitomised <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> MDGs and EFA goals, has been <strong>on</strong> access, i.e. <strong>on</strong> simply gett<strong>in</strong>g more girls and women<strong>in</strong>to and through school, with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> emphasis <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first <strong>in</strong>stance <strong>on</strong> elim<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g gender disparities <strong>in</strong>enrolment.Gender disparities <strong>in</strong> educati<strong>on</strong>al participati<strong>on</strong> have been found to exist at all levels <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> formal educati<strong>on</strong>nati<strong>on</strong>ally, with fewer girls than boys, <strong>on</strong> average, participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> and complet<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong>and c<strong>on</strong>t<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to post-<strong>basic</strong> and tertiary educati<strong>on</strong> (NPC and ICF Macro 2009; UNDP 2009; Bakari2013; NPC and RTI Internati<strong>on</strong>al 2011; British Council 2012). These gender disparities vary c<strong>on</strong>siderablyacross geo-political z<strong>on</strong>es, states and LGAs, as well as accord<strong>in</strong>g to urban/rural locati<strong>on</strong>, socio-ec<strong>on</strong>omicstatus, religi<strong>on</strong> and o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r c<strong>on</strong>textual factors.As was expla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> Secti<strong>on</strong> 2.3, patterns <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> enrolment and attendance are difficult to disentangle. AsTable 8.1 <strong>in</strong> part shows, even though at a nati<strong>on</strong>al and z<strong>on</strong>al level enrolments for girls and boys seem tobe decreas<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> public sector (except <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North West, where enrolments are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g, albeitfrom a very low basel<strong>in</strong>e), state-level enrolments vary. The state ASC data for Kano and Jigawa, forexample, show <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> actual number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> girls <strong>in</strong> schools <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g as well as account<strong>in</strong>g for an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>glyhigher proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> enrolments from 2009/10 to 2011/12, account<strong>in</strong>g for about 48% and 43% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> publicprimary enrolments, respectively. They comprised an even higher proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> private schoolenrolments <strong>in</strong> Jigawa, at 51.2%.EDOREN – Educati<strong>on</strong> Data, Research and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria 83
Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> NigeriaTable 8.1 Primary school enrolment* by gender and school type, 2006/07 to 2009/102006/072007/082008/092009/10Public Private TotalFemale Male Total Female Male Total Female Male Total9.4(45.9)8.7(45.8)8.7(46.0)8.8(46.3)11.1(54.1)10.3(54.2)10.2(54.0)10.2(53.7)20.5(100)19.0(100)18.9(100)19.0(100)0.6(50.0)0.5(50.0)0.6(50.0)0.8(50.0)0.6(50.0)0.5(50.0)0.6(50.0)0.8(50.0)1.2(100)1.0(100)1.2(100)1.6(100)10.0(46.1)9.2(46.0)9.3(46.3)9.6(46.4)11.7(53.910.8(54.0)10.8(53.7)11.0(53.1)21.7(100)20.0(100)20.1(100)20.7(100)* Numbers <strong>in</strong> milli<strong>on</strong>sSource: FME (2011b)Gender disparities exist <strong>in</strong> terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> exam performance too. An analysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> NECO exam performances<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> female students at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sec<strong>on</strong>dary school shows that results have been deteriorat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> recentyears (2003–2007), with fewer female pupils reach<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> threshold <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> five credits (British Council 2012).Numerical disparities, however, are embedded <strong>in</strong> broader societal gender <strong>in</strong>equalities (Bakari 2013),which are discussed <strong>in</strong> greater detail <strong>in</strong> Secti<strong>on</strong> 8.3.8.3 Barriers to girls’ school<strong>in</strong>g: key issuesMany <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>terl<strong>in</strong>ked issues listed below are covered <strong>in</strong> more detail elsewhere <strong>in</strong> this <str<strong>on</strong>g>review</str<strong>on</strong>g>, but aresummarised here <strong>in</strong> <strong>on</strong>e place. All <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> issues have been found to result <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> n<strong>on</strong>-enrolment,absenteeism and/or eventual dropp<strong>in</strong>g out <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> girls from school, and/or to affect <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> quality <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>experience that girls have <strong>in</strong> school, and/or to impact negatively <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir school<strong>in</strong>g outcomes. In manycases, participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> school<strong>in</strong>g is affected by a comb<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ‘out-<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>-school’ and ‘<strong>in</strong>-school’ issues. As<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> GEP II evaluati<strong>on</strong> summarised:Barriers to ‘mean<strong>in</strong>gful access’ are typically many, complex and <strong>in</strong>ter-c<strong>on</strong>nected, occurr<strong>in</strong>g for differentchildren, <strong>in</strong> different comb<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s, at different stages <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> cycle (UNICEF 2012: 3).Although many <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se issues affect boys too (see Secti<strong>on</strong> 8.6), <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> references given here relate toworks where <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> impact <strong>on</strong> girls <strong>in</strong> particular has been highlighted.8.3.1 Out-<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>-school issuesThe follow<strong>in</strong>g socio-ec<strong>on</strong>omic and socio-cultural reas<strong>on</strong>s can have a negative impact <strong>on</strong> girls’ full andmean<strong>in</strong>gful participati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> school<strong>in</strong>g; <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs are drawn ma<strong>in</strong>ly from research <strong>in</strong> nor<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn Nigeria.It should be noted that many <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> follow<strong>in</strong>g factors – such as <strong>in</strong>ability to pay school fees, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> need toearn m<strong>on</strong>ey and issues <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> hunger and ill health – are rooted <strong>in</strong> poverty.Parental/community attitudesAm<strong>on</strong>g some Muslim parents/guardians public schools are c<strong>on</strong>sidered un-Islamic, and/or toowesternised, and/or corrupt<strong>in</strong>g (Chege et al. 2008; Okojie 2008; Nyemutu-Roberts et al. 2009;Acti<strong>on</strong>Aid 2011; UNICEF 2012; Dunne et al. 2013); Any ec<strong>on</strong>omic ‘benefit’ from formal educati<strong>on</strong> will go to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> husband’s home (Dunne et al. 2013);EDOREN – Educati<strong>on</strong> Data, Research and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria 84
- Page 1 and 2:
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON BASICED
- Page 3 and 4:
Review of
- Page 5 and 6:
Review of
- Page 7 and 8:
Review of
- Page 9 and 10:
Review of
- Page 11 and 12:
Review of
- Page 13 and 14:
Review of
- Page 15 and 16:
Review of
- Page 17 and 18:
Review of
- Page 19 and 20:
Review of
- Page 21 and 22:
Review of
- Page 23 and 24:
Review of
- Page 25 and 26:
Review of
- Page 27 and 28:
Review of
- Page 29 and 30:
Review of
- Page 31 and 32:
Review of
- Page 33 and 34:
Review of
- Page 35 and 36:
Review of
- Page 37 and 38:
Review of
- Page 39 and 40:
Review of
- Page 41 and 42:
Review of
- Page 43 and 44:
Review of
- Page 45 and 46:
Review of
- Page 47 and 48:
Review of
- Page 49 and 50:
Review of
- Page 51 and 52:
Review of
- Page 53 and 54:
Review of
- Page 55 and 56:
Review of
- Page 57 and 58:
Review of
- Page 59 and 60: Review of
- Page 61 and 62: Review of
- Page 63 and 64: Review of
- Page 65 and 66: Review of
- Page 67 and 68: Review of
- Page 69 and 70: Review of
- Page 71 and 72: Review of
- Page 73 and 74: Review of
- Page 75 and 76: Review of
- Page 77 and 78: Review of
- Page 79 and 80: Review of
- Page 81 and 82: Review of
- Page 83 and 84: Review of
- Page 85 and 86: Review of
- Page 87 and 88: Review of
- Page 89 and 90: Review of
- Page 91 and 92: Review of
- Page 93 and 94: Review of
- Page 95 and 96: Review of
- Page 97 and 98: Review of
- Page 99 and 100: Review of
- Page 101 and 102: Review of
- Page 103 and 104: Review of
- Page 105 and 106: Review of
- Page 107 and 108: Review of
- Page 109: Review of
- Page 113 and 114: Review of
- Page 115 and 116: Review of
- Page 117 and 118: Review of
- Page 119 and 120: Review of
- Page 121 and 122: Review of
- Page 123 and 124: Review of
- Page 125 and 126: Review of
- Page 127 and 128: Review of
- Page 129 and 130: Review of
- Page 131 and 132: Review of
- Page 133 and 134: Review of
- Page 135 and 136: Review of
- Page 137 and 138: Review of
- Page 139 and 140: Review of
- Page 141 and 142: Review of
- Page 143 and 144: Review of
- Page 145 and 146: Review of
- Page 147 and 148: Review of
- Page 149 and 150: Review of
- Page 151 and 152: Review of
- Page 153 and 154: Review of
- Page 155 and 156: Review of
- Page 157 and 158: Review of
- Page 159 and 160: Review of
- Page 161 and 162:
Review of
- Page 163 and 164:
Review of
- Page 165 and 166:
Review of
- Page 167 and 168:
Review of
- Page 169 and 170:
Review of
- Page 171 and 172:
Review of
- Page 173 and 174:
Review of
- Page 175 and 176:
Review of
- Page 177 and 178:
Review of
- Page 179 and 180:
Review of
- Page 181 and 182:
Review of
- Page 183 and 184:
Review of
- Page 185 and 186:
Review of
- Page 187 and 188:
Review of
- Page 189 and 190:
Review of
- Page 191 and 192:
Review of
- Page 193 and 194:
Review of
- Page 195 and 196:
Review of
- Page 197 and 198:
Review of
- Page 199 and 200:
Review of
- Page 201 and 202:
Review of
- Page 203 and 204:
Review of
- Page 205 and 206:
Review of
- Page 207 and 208:
Review of
- Page 209 and 210:
Review of