Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> NigeriaAlthough Table 2.3 po<strong>in</strong>ts to positive <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> transiti<strong>on</strong> rates, it also highlights that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is still al<strong>on</strong>g way to go to reach UBE as <strong>on</strong>ly <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sou<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn z<strong>on</strong>es have achieved transiti<strong>on</strong> rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> over 50%,although over 50% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> boys are mak<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> transiti<strong>on</strong> to JSS <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North West and North Central. TheUBEC impact assessment found that a shortage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> accessible JSSs was a major obstacle to complet<strong>in</strong>g<strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> a number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> states (UBEC 2012a).Table 2.3Transiti<strong>on</strong> rates (%) from public primary schools to public junior sec<strong>on</strong>dary school by geopoliticalz<strong>on</strong>e*Data from Bauchi were excluded because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an obvious data <strong>in</strong>put error.**Data are miss<strong>in</strong>g for Plateau State.*** Data from Delta State were excluded because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an obvious <strong>in</strong>put error.Source: FME (2011b)Z<strong>on</strong>e 2006/07 2009/10F M Total F M TotalNorth West 41 50 47 41 52 47North East* 33 36 35 34 39 37North Central** 42 45 44 45 53 49South West 53 54 54 83 85 84South South*** 47 34 40 69 47 56South East 33 31 32 56 52 54TOTAL 43 44 43 54 55 542.4 AttendanceAttendance data from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> two NEDS, which relate to both public and private schools, show little changebetween 2004 and 2010. 61% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> primary school-aged children (age 6–11) attended school at some stagedur<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> survey year for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2010 NEDS, compared with 60% <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> survey year for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2004 report.Even <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North West, where much <strong>in</strong>ternati<strong>on</strong>al assistance has been focused, net primary attendanceratios have rema<strong>in</strong>ed almost unchanged from 41.7% <strong>in</strong> 2004 to 41.0% <strong>in</strong> 2010. This stagnati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> schoolattendance rates c<strong>on</strong>trasts with many o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r countries <strong>in</strong> SSA, which have shown marked improvements<strong>in</strong> school attendance over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same period (Ant<strong>on</strong><strong>in</strong>is 2012).Broadly speak<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> Nigeria school attendance levels are lower <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> north than <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> south, <strong>in</strong> ruralareas than <strong>in</strong> urban, and <strong>in</strong> poorer households than <strong>in</strong> richer. School attendance rates are also lower forgirls than for boys and for Muslims than for n<strong>on</strong>-Muslims (NPC and RTI Internati<strong>on</strong>al 2011).Rates are also particularly low am<strong>on</strong>g nomadic children and migrant children (NCNE 2008) and childrenwith disabilities (Lang and Upah 2008), although government <strong>in</strong>itiatives are <strong>in</strong> place to try to address<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se issues. These disparities am<strong>on</strong>g different social groups are discussed <strong>in</strong> brief below, and <strong>in</strong> moredetail <strong>in</strong> later chapters.Of all children aged 6–16 surveyed <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2010 NEDS, 31% were reported as never hav<strong>in</strong>g attendedschool (NPC and RTI Internati<strong>on</strong>al 2011).2.4.1 Geographical regi<strong>on</strong>sAs Figure 2.1 clearly illustrates, attendance rates are particularly low <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nor<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn regi<strong>on</strong>s. The 2010NEDS reports <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> primary NAR to be just 41% <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North East and North West z<strong>on</strong>es, compared to 80%EDOREN – Educati<strong>on</strong> Data, Research and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria 13
Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria<strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> three sou<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn z<strong>on</strong>es (NPC and RTI Internati<strong>on</strong>al 2011). Primary attendance ratios are also muchlower <strong>in</strong> rural areas (55%, down from 56% <strong>in</strong> 2004) than <strong>in</strong> urban areas (74%, up from 70% <strong>in</strong> 2004).Of all children aged 6–16 surveyed who had never attended school, 90% were from rural areas, with84% be<strong>in</strong>g from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North East and North West regi<strong>on</strong>s (ibid.). There are also substantial variati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong>attendance between and with<strong>in</strong> states, as Figure 2.1 also shows. In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North East average primaryattendance ratios are 21% <strong>in</strong> Borno State but 58% <strong>in</strong> Adamawa. In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North West rates are 18% <strong>in</strong>Zamfara but 69% <strong>in</strong> Kaduna (ibid.). The NEDS does not allow disaggregati<strong>on</strong> at LGEA level, butadm<strong>in</strong>istrative data suggest that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are also very high variati<strong>on</strong>s between LGEAs with<strong>in</strong> states.Figure 2.1: Primary net attendance ratio, 2010Source: Adapted from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2010 NEDS (NPC and RTI Internati<strong>on</strong>al 2011).2.4.2 GenderThe 2010 NEDS <strong>in</strong>dicates that primary attendance ratios for males and females are roughly similar <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>sou<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn and North Central z<strong>on</strong>es but are much lower for females <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North East and North Westz<strong>on</strong>es (38% and 35%, respectively) than for males (43% and 47%, respectively). There is a smaller gendergap <strong>in</strong> attendance ratios at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> JSS level, where overall attendance is lower than at primary level (NPCand RTI Internati<strong>on</strong>al 2011).The overall nati<strong>on</strong>al net primary attendance ratio for males is 63.5% and for females is 58.4%. Atsec<strong>on</strong>dary level rates are, <strong>on</strong> average, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same, at 44% for both females and males, albeit withdisparities accord<strong>in</strong>g to regi<strong>on</strong>, wealth qu<strong>in</strong>tile and urban or rural locati<strong>on</strong> that are similar to those thatexist at primary level.EDOREN – Educati<strong>on</strong> Data, Research and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria 14
- Page 1 and 2: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON BASICED
- Page 3 and 4: Review of
- Page 5 and 6: Review of
- Page 7 and 8: Review of
- Page 9 and 10: Review of
- Page 11 and 12: Review of
- Page 13 and 14: Review of
- Page 15 and 16: Review of
- Page 17 and 18: Review of
- Page 19 and 20: Review of
- Page 21 and 22: Review of
- Page 23 and 24: Review of
- Page 25 and 26: Review of
- Page 27 and 28: Review of
- Page 29 and 30: Review of
- Page 31 and 32: Review of
- Page 33 and 34: Review of
- Page 35 and 36: Review of
- Page 37 and 38: Review of
- Page 39: Review of
- Page 43 and 44: Review of
- Page 45 and 46: Review of
- Page 47 and 48: Review of
- Page 49 and 50: Review of
- Page 51 and 52: Review of
- Page 53 and 54: Review of
- Page 55 and 56: Review of
- Page 57 and 58: Review of
- Page 59 and 60: Review of
- Page 61 and 62: Review of
- Page 63 and 64: Review of
- Page 65 and 66: Review of
- Page 67 and 68: Review of
- Page 69 and 70: Review of
- Page 71 and 72: Review of
- Page 73 and 74: Review of
- Page 75 and 76: Review of
- Page 77 and 78: Review of
- Page 79 and 80: Review of
- Page 81 and 82: Review of
- Page 83 and 84: Review of
- Page 85 and 86: Review of
- Page 87 and 88: Review of
- Page 89 and 90: Review of
- Page 91 and 92:
Review of
- Page 93 and 94:
Review of
- Page 95 and 96:
Review of
- Page 97 and 98:
Review of
- Page 99 and 100:
Review of
- Page 101 and 102:
Review of
- Page 103 and 104:
Review of
- Page 105 and 106:
Review of
- Page 107 and 108:
Review of
- Page 109 and 110:
Review of
- Page 111 and 112:
Review of
- Page 113 and 114:
Review of
- Page 115 and 116:
Review of
- Page 117 and 118:
Review of
- Page 119 and 120:
Review of
- Page 121 and 122:
Review of
- Page 123 and 124:
Review of
- Page 125 and 126:
Review of
- Page 127 and 128:
Review of
- Page 129 and 130:
Review of
- Page 131 and 132:
Review of
- Page 133 and 134:
Review of
- Page 135 and 136:
Review of
- Page 137 and 138:
Review of
- Page 139 and 140:
Review of
- Page 141 and 142:
Review of
- Page 143 and 144:
Review of
- Page 145 and 146:
Review of
- Page 147 and 148:
Review of
- Page 149 and 150:
Review of
- Page 151 and 152:
Review of
- Page 153 and 154:
Review of
- Page 155 and 156:
Review of
- Page 157 and 158:
Review of
- Page 159 and 160:
Review of
- Page 161 and 162:
Review of
- Page 163 and 164:
Review of
- Page 165 and 166:
Review of
- Page 167 and 168:
Review of
- Page 169 and 170:
Review of
- Page 171 and 172:
Review of
- Page 173 and 174:
Review of
- Page 175 and 176:
Review of
- Page 177 and 178:
Review of
- Page 179 and 180:
Review of
- Page 181 and 182:
Review of
- Page 183 and 184:
Review of
- Page 185 and 186:
Review of
- Page 187 and 188:
Review of
- Page 189 and 190:
Review of
- Page 191 and 192:
Review of
- Page 193 and 194:
Review of
- Page 195 and 196:
Review of
- Page 197 and 198:
Review of
- Page 199 and 200:
Review of
- Page 201 and 202:
Review of
- Page 203 and 204:
Review of
- Page 205 and 206:
Review of
- Page 207 and 208:
Review of
- Page 209 and 210:
Review of