Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria5.5.2 Child mortalityIt was Caldwell’s study <strong>in</strong> 1979 based <strong>on</strong> Nigerian data that highlighted <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> role <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mo<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r’seducati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> reduc<strong>in</strong>g child mortality. The 2008 NDHS data support <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ory that female educati<strong>on</strong>can improve child health outcomes – ne<strong>on</strong>atal, <strong>in</strong>fant, child, and under-five mortality are all lower forwomen with higher levels <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> educati<strong>on</strong>. More educated women have children with higher birth weight,space <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir births more, are more likely to vacc<strong>in</strong>ate <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir children and use appropriate treatment formalaria and diarrhoea, have appropriate hygiene practices and feed<strong>in</strong>g practices, and are less likely tohave malnourished children (NPC and ICF Macro 2009).The pathways through which <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mo<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r’s educati<strong>on</strong> reduce child mortality <strong>in</strong> Nigeria were explored bySmith-Greenaway (2013), who found that maternal literacy (measured through <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> simple NEDS <strong>on</strong>esentenceread<strong>in</strong>g test) expla<strong>in</strong>s most <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> relati<strong>on</strong>ship between school<strong>in</strong>g and child mortality. Adeoti(2009) showed that female school<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>creases demand for child vacc<strong>in</strong>ati<strong>on</strong>s (based <strong>on</strong> 2003/04 NLSSdata).5.5.3 Parent and child educati<strong>on</strong>The educati<strong>on</strong>al level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>e or both parents has been found to be an important <strong>in</strong>dicator <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r ornot a child is likely to be <strong>in</strong> school. Akyeamp<strong>on</strong>g et al.’s (2009) analysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> four states found that childrenwho were <strong>in</strong> school had parents that have more than twice as much school<strong>in</strong>g as parents <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> childrenwho were out <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> school. Similarly, Okpukpara and Odurukwe’s (2006) analysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2001 FOS/ILO childlabour survey data also showed that children from households whose mo<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r or fa<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r had sec<strong>on</strong>daryor higher educati<strong>on</strong> were more likely to be <strong>in</strong> school.Kazeem et al. (2010) estimated a model <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> school attendance based <strong>on</strong> household characteristics takenfrom 2004 NDHS data; after c<strong>on</strong>troll<strong>in</strong>g for various factors <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g wealth and locati<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y found thatparents’ educati<strong>on</strong> at primary level has a positive impact <strong>on</strong> school attendance, although higher levels <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>educati<strong>on</strong> do not <strong>in</strong>crease this any fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r.L<strong>in</strong>cove (2009) looked at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> NDHS 2004 data and found that, c<strong>on</strong>troll<strong>in</strong>g for o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r determ<strong>in</strong>ants <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>school attendance, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mo<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r’s educati<strong>on</strong> is statistically significantly positively correlated with schoolattendance.5.5.4 Adult literacy and school<strong>in</strong>gHowever, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> low levels <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> adult literacy <strong>in</strong> many parts <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> country, even <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> those whohave completed primary educati<strong>on</strong>, for example, raise questi<strong>on</strong>s about what exactly it is about school<strong>in</strong>gthat expla<strong>in</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> effects menti<strong>on</strong>ed above.S<strong>in</strong>ce <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2010 literacy survey (NBS 2010) gave figures based <strong>on</strong> self-reported data that are c<strong>on</strong>siderablyhigher than any <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> available assessment data, it is probably better to c<strong>on</strong>sider <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2010 NEDSfigures, even though, as highlighted earlier, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir limited literacy test provides an overestimati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>functi<strong>on</strong>al literacy. The 2010 NEDS found that, am<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> parents and guardians surveyed, around 55%were literate, with figures rang<strong>in</strong>g widely accord<strong>in</strong>g to age (older people were less likely to be able toread), urban or rural locati<strong>on</strong> (rural 48% and urban 76%) and geographical z<strong>on</strong>e (39% <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North Westand North East but 75% <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> South South) (NPC and RTI Internati<strong>on</strong>al 2011). There was little differenceat <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al level accord<strong>in</strong>g to gender, although figures had dropped for men from 59% <strong>in</strong> 2004 to55% <strong>in</strong> 2010 (ibid.)In terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> school<strong>in</strong>g, 62 % <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> survey’s parent/guardian populati<strong>on</strong> had completed primary or higherlevels <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> school<strong>in</strong>g; 41% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> men and 35% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> women had never attended school. Rural/urban andEDOREN – Educati<strong>on</strong> Data, Research and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria 53
Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigerianorth/south disparities were marked, but <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n it is worth reiterat<strong>in</strong>g that IQTE schools, which many <strong>in</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nor<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn and more rural areas attend, were not counted as formal school<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> survey.5.6 Impact <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> macro-ec<strong>on</strong>omyAt <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same time as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re be<strong>in</strong>g str<strong>on</strong>g evidence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ec<strong>on</strong>omic benefits to <strong>in</strong>dividuals from school<strong>in</strong>g,<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is a ‘paradox’ as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se ec<strong>on</strong>omic ga<strong>in</strong>s do not show up <strong>in</strong> aggregate ec<strong>on</strong>omic growth. Ndiyo(2007) looked at data from 1970 to 2000 <strong>in</strong> Nigeria and failed to f<strong>in</strong>d a relati<strong>on</strong>ship between aggregateschool<strong>in</strong>g and ec<strong>on</strong>omic growth. Pritchett (2001) found a similar situati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> cross-nati<strong>on</strong>al data,<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fer<strong>in</strong>g three possible explanati<strong>on</strong>s for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ‘paradox’: first, that educati<strong>on</strong> has g<strong>on</strong>e <strong>in</strong>to ‘piracy,’ or<strong>in</strong>dividually remunerative but socially unproductive activity; sec<strong>on</strong>d, that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re has been slow growth <strong>in</strong>demand for skilled labour; and, third, that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> quality <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> school<strong>in</strong>g is poor and leads to low actual skillacquisiti<strong>on</strong>. Ndiyo (2007) suggested that <strong>in</strong> Nigeria <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> specific explanati<strong>on</strong>s may <strong>in</strong>clude a poorlyfuncti<strong>on</strong><strong>in</strong>g labour market, emigrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> skilled labour, <strong>in</strong>dustrial disputes, and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> low quality <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>school<strong>in</strong>g. Ojomite (2010) c<strong>on</strong>sidered data from 1980 to 2005, f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g that, although spend<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong>educati<strong>on</strong> leads to ec<strong>on</strong>omic growth, this is from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> direct impact <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ec<strong>on</strong>omy <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> spend<strong>in</strong>g throughteachers’ salaries; <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re was no causal relati<strong>on</strong>ship from capital spend<strong>in</strong>g or school enrolment <strong>on</strong>ec<strong>on</strong>omic growth.5.7 Issues aris<strong>in</strong>g and gaps <strong>in</strong> evidenceSchool<strong>in</strong>g seems to result <strong>in</strong> poor learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes for many students, particularly <strong>in</strong> relati<strong>on</strong> toliteracy and numeracy. However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is scant <strong>in</strong>formati<strong>on</strong> available about progress <strong>in</strong> learn<strong>in</strong>goutcomes. Very little attenti<strong>on</strong> is paid to m<strong>on</strong>itor<strong>in</strong>g and measur<strong>in</strong>g how <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se learn<strong>in</strong>g levels maychange over time (compared to measur<strong>in</strong>g ‘<strong>in</strong>puts’ such as teachers and <strong>in</strong>frastructure as proxies forquality). There are no l<strong>on</strong>gitud<strong>in</strong>al tests and surveys measur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dividuals across time, which wouldallow for greater understand<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> progress (or lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>) that students are mak<strong>in</strong>g, and <strong>in</strong> whichyears.Attenti<strong>on</strong> needs to be paid to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> extent to which pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>iciency <strong>in</strong> English affects learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes <strong>in</strong>different subjects.Follow<strong>in</strong>g this, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is a weak understand<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r and how years or school<strong>in</strong>g and/or educati<strong>on</strong>aloutcomes relate to o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r outcomes such as labour market performance and health. More research <strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r types <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> learn<strong>in</strong>g and knowledge (bey<strong>on</strong>d literacy and numeracy) that pupils might acquiredur<strong>in</strong>g school<strong>in</strong>g, which might help expla<strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> positive correlati<strong>on</strong>s between school<strong>in</strong>g and o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>routcomes, is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore necessary.There are also no studies that explore <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> social impacts <strong>on</strong> school<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pupils’ wellbe<strong>in</strong>g, selfc<strong>on</strong>fidenceor ability to <strong>in</strong>teract with o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rs. This is potentially a serious omissi<strong>on</strong> given grow<strong>in</strong>gevidence <strong>in</strong>ternati<strong>on</strong>ally that ‘n<strong>on</strong>-cognitive’ skills such as curiosity and self-c<strong>on</strong>trol are more importantdeterm<strong>in</strong>ants <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> later life success than technical skills <strong>in</strong> academic subjects such as Ma<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>matics andEnglish (Tough 2013).Quality <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>evidence:ModerateSize <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> body <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>evidence:MediumEvidence Strength AssessmentC<strong>on</strong>sistency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>results:Fairly C<strong>on</strong>sistentClosely matched totopic:HighOverallassessment:MediumEDOREN – Educati<strong>on</strong> Data, Research and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria 54
- Page 1 and 2:
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON BASICED
- Page 3 and 4:
Review of
- Page 5 and 6:
Review of
- Page 7 and 8:
Review of
- Page 9 and 10:
Review of
- Page 11 and 12:
Review of
- Page 13 and 14:
Review of
- Page 15 and 16:
Review of
- Page 17 and 18:
Review of
- Page 19 and 20:
Review of
- Page 21 and 22:
Review of
- Page 23 and 24:
Review of
- Page 25 and 26:
Review of
- Page 27 and 28:
Review of
- Page 29 and 30: Review of
- Page 31 and 32: Review of
- Page 33 and 34: Review of
- Page 35 and 36: Review of
- Page 37 and 38: Review of
- Page 39 and 40: Review of
- Page 41 and 42: Review of
- Page 43 and 44: Review of
- Page 45 and 46: Review of
- Page 47 and 48: Review of
- Page 49 and 50: Review of
- Page 51 and 52: Review of
- Page 53 and 54: Review of
- Page 55 and 56: Review of
- Page 57 and 58: Review of
- Page 59 and 60: Review of
- Page 61 and 62: Review of
- Page 63 and 64: Review of
- Page 65 and 66: Review of
- Page 67 and 68: Review of
- Page 69 and 70: Review of
- Page 71 and 72: Review of
- Page 73 and 74: Review of
- Page 75 and 76: Review of
- Page 77 and 78: Review of
- Page 79: Review of
- Page 83 and 84: Review of
- Page 85 and 86: Review of
- Page 87 and 88: Review of
- Page 89 and 90: Review of
- Page 91 and 92: Review of
- Page 93 and 94: Review of
- Page 95 and 96: Review of
- Page 97 and 98: Review of
- Page 99 and 100: Review of
- Page 101 and 102: Review of
- Page 103 and 104: Review of
- Page 105 and 106: Review of
- Page 107 and 108: Review of
- Page 109 and 110: Review of
- Page 111 and 112: Review of
- Page 113 and 114: Review of
- Page 115 and 116: Review of
- Page 117 and 118: Review of
- Page 119 and 120: Review of
- Page 121 and 122: Review of
- Page 123 and 124: Review of
- Page 125 and 126: Review of
- Page 127 and 128: Review of
- Page 129 and 130: Review of
- Page 131 and 132:
Review of
- Page 133 and 134:
Review of
- Page 135 and 136:
Review of
- Page 137 and 138:
Review of
- Page 139 and 140:
Review of
- Page 141 and 142:
Review of
- Page 143 and 144:
Review of
- Page 145 and 146:
Review of
- Page 147 and 148:
Review of
- Page 149 and 150:
Review of
- Page 151 and 152:
Review of
- Page 153 and 154:
Review of
- Page 155 and 156:
Review of
- Page 157 and 158:
Review of
- Page 159 and 160:
Review of
- Page 161 and 162:
Review of
- Page 163 and 164:
Review of
- Page 165 and 166:
Review of
- Page 167 and 168:
Review of
- Page 169 and 170:
Review of
- Page 171 and 172:
Review of
- Page 173 and 174:
Review of
- Page 175 and 176:
Review of
- Page 177 and 178:
Review of
- Page 179 and 180:
Review of
- Page 181 and 182:
Review of
- Page 183 and 184:
Review of
- Page 185 and 186:
Review of
- Page 187 and 188:
Review of
- Page 189 and 190:
Review of
- Page 191 and 192:
Review of
- Page 193 and 194:
Review of
- Page 195 and 196:
Review of
- Page 197 and 198:
Review of
- Page 199 and 200:
Review of
- Page 201 and 202:
Review of
- Page 203 and 204:
Review of
- Page 205 and 206:
Review of
- Page 207 and 208:
Review of
- Page 209 and 210:
Review of