Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> NigeriaTable 10.2 Primary school teachers by gender, qualificati<strong>on</strong> and school type, 2010ZONENW 24TotalTeachers147,390PUBLIC%FT %MT %QT%QFT**%QMT***TotalTeachersPRIVATE%FT %MT %QT%QFT*%QMT**26.5 73.5 46.1 25.8 53.5 1,922 45.0 55.0 80.4 74.9 83.2NE 48, 893 24.7 75.3 42.8 55.5 38.6 8,210 36.5 63.5 72.8 75.2 71.4NC 25 105,6135.5 64.5 75.7 98.1 63.5 19,078 44.1 55.9 83.0 78.1 86.79SW 26 87,539 73.3 26.7 98.5 99.2 96.8 16,375 65.0 35.0 93.5 92.9 94.5SS 27 81,070 68.0 32.0 55.4 58.5 48.5 21,177 66.0 34.0 73.7 72.6 75.9SE 49,283 76.7 23.3 77.4 82.2 61.7 9,137 74.0 26.0 74.6 72.7 80.0TOTAL519,79447.3 52.7 65.1 73.5 57.5 75,899 57.6 42.4 80.5 78.8 82.7* FT= female teacher; MT= male teacher; QT = qualified teacher.** The percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> female teachers that are qualified.*** The percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> male teachers that are qualified.Source: FME (2011b)Table 10.2 also shows that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> qualified teachers <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> private primary sector for2010 is substantially higher than for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> government sector, at around 80%; this is also <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> case acrossmost regi<strong>on</strong>s, except <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> South West and South East.Female teachers are <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten said to be important for <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g female enrolment (see Secti<strong>on</strong> 8.5). In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>public primary sector (see Table 10.2), a far higher proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> teachers <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> south are women –around three-quarters <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> teach<strong>in</strong>g force <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> South West and South East. This is <strong>in</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trast to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>North West and North East, where <strong>on</strong>ly around a quarter <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> public primary teachers are women. Interms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> qualificati<strong>on</strong>s, nati<strong>on</strong>ally a higher percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> female teachers are qualified (73.5%) thanmale teachers (57.5%), with a similar pattern across <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> regi<strong>on</strong>s, except <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North West, where <strong>on</strong>lyaround a quarter <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> female teachers are qualified, compared to over half <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> male teachers.In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> private primary sector, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> situati<strong>on</strong> is reversed, with generally a higher proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> maleteachers qualified than female teachers, except <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North East (FME 2011b). Aga<strong>in</strong>, however, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>reare great variati<strong>on</strong>s am<strong>on</strong>g and with<strong>in</strong> states and data are <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten lack<strong>in</strong>g for private schools.The data <strong>on</strong> teachers for public and private JSSs are even more sparse, especially for private schools,with many states lack<strong>in</strong>g figures, although <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y suggest a higher proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> qualified teachers <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>public sector nati<strong>on</strong>ally (87.5%) than at primary level, whereas <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> private sector <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>qualified teachers is lower (76.7%) than at primary level. In broad terms, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is a greater proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>female teachers (<strong>in</strong> relati<strong>on</strong> to male teachers) <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> south and a greater proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> male teachers <strong>in</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> north, <strong>in</strong> both <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> private and public sectors at JSS level (FME 2011b).Although it may be an important equity issue to determ<strong>in</strong>e who gets access to tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g for certificati<strong>on</strong>,it is equally important to note that possess<strong>in</strong>g a paper qualificati<strong>on</strong> is no guarantee <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> greaterpr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al competence (FME 2011a; see also Secti<strong>on</strong> 10.5).As regards who teaches which subjects, <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2004 ESA surveys looked at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> gender and subjectchoice <strong>in</strong> teacher educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong>stituti<strong>on</strong>s and found a high level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> gender stereotyp<strong>in</strong>g. All studentteachers <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Home Ec<strong>on</strong>omics were female and over half specialis<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> primary were also female. In24No data <strong>on</strong> private schools from Kaduna, Kats<strong>in</strong>a, Sokoto and Jigawa states.25No data recorded from Plateau State and <strong>in</strong>complete data <strong>on</strong> private schools for Kwara, Kogi and Nasarawa states.26No data for private schools from Lagos and Ogun states.27Incomplete data.EDOREN – Educati<strong>on</strong> Data, Research and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria 115
Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeriacomparis<strong>on</strong>, female student teachers <strong>on</strong>ly comprised 8.2% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Maths <strong>in</strong>take, 6.3% <strong>in</strong> PhysicalEducati<strong>on</strong> and 3.4 % <strong>in</strong> Technical Educati<strong>on</strong> (FME 2005).There was no available research <strong>on</strong> teachers’ pers<strong>on</strong>al characteristics that might enhance or h<strong>in</strong>derlearn<strong>in</strong>g.10.3 Teacher appo<strong>in</strong>tment and deploymentTeacher appo<strong>in</strong>tment and deployment is ano<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r c<strong>on</strong>tentious area that affects educati<strong>on</strong>al quality.Some states and LGEAs lack qualified teachers; o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rs have too many (see Thomas (2011) for acomparis<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Kwara and Jigawa states, for example). Although teacher shortages can sometimes beattributable to a lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> teachers, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y are <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten due to o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r processes, as expla<strong>in</strong>ed below.Inevitably, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> teachers <strong>in</strong> many schools results <strong>in</strong> higher PTRs and overcrowded classes (seeSecti<strong>on</strong> 3.4), which can lead to low teacher morale (see below) and to teacher and/or pupil absenteeismand dropout.Qualified teachers are <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten lack<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> some schools (especially <strong>in</strong> rural areas), with a surfeit <strong>in</strong> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rschools (<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten more urban <strong>on</strong>es), for a variety <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> reas<strong>on</strong>s:The overlapp<strong>in</strong>g resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities for teacher appo<strong>in</strong>tment and deployment between SUBEBs andLGEAs and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> frequent lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> trust and communicati<strong>on</strong> between <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> two can result <strong>in</strong> unevendeployment (Adelabu 2005; Williams 2009; see also Box 6.2);Teachers, especially female teachers, <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten refuse rural post<strong>in</strong>gs or ask for a transfer, usually <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>grounds <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> need<strong>in</strong>g to be with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir spouse <strong>in</strong> an urban area (Adelabu 2005); Teachers transferred from rural areas are <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten not replaced (Dunne et al. 2013);LGEAs will sometimes deploy or transfer teachers to particular areas as a way <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> spread<strong>in</strong>g politicalpatr<strong>on</strong>age – sometimes because <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y too are under political pressure (Williams 2009; Dunne et al.2013);Unqualified teachers are sometimes appo<strong>in</strong>ted ahead <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> qualified teachers because <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y arecheaper and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> LGEA lacks funds (Sherry 2008; Williams 2009; Dunne et al. 2013), but this can havea detrimental effect <strong>on</strong> teacher morale, which itself affects educati<strong>on</strong>al quality (Sherry 2008; Dunneet al. 2013); and There are reports <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> teacher qualificati<strong>on</strong>s be<strong>in</strong>g faked (Williams 2009).The lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> reliable data <strong>on</strong> teacher numbers and qualificati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>in</strong> particular areas makes it difficult tom<strong>on</strong>itor and address irregularities and <strong>in</strong>equities <strong>in</strong> teacher appo<strong>in</strong>tment and deployment (Williams2009). Similarly, while teacher attriti<strong>on</strong> is said to be high (Urwick and Aliyu 2003; Umar 2006), <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re areno reliable data <strong>on</strong> teacher attriti<strong>on</strong> rates with which to assess <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> scale and to help identify <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> specificcauses <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> problem. Some states have <strong>in</strong>itiated <strong>in</strong>centives for rural teachers, although even where<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y exist <strong>on</strong> paper <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y are <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten not paid (Adelabu 2005) or are susceptible to favouritism (Sherry2008). The 2004 ESA reported that teachers <strong>in</strong> 46.5% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> schools sampled were entitled to a ruralpost<strong>in</strong>g allowance, but <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>in</strong> 3.7% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> schools was <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> allowance said to have been paid (FME 2005).Moreover, as studies elsewhere <strong>in</strong> SSA have shown, f<strong>in</strong>ancial <strong>in</strong>centives have to be substantial tooutweigh <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> social and ec<strong>on</strong>omic advantages <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an urban area (Mulkeen 2006). In additi<strong>on</strong>, toget <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> best value out <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>centives <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> classificati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> rural schools needs to be carefully thought outso that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> most remote and isolated schools are targeted (ibid.).Ano<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r issue <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>cern is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> appropriateness <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> teacher deployment and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mismatch betweenteacher tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g specialisati<strong>on</strong>s and appo<strong>in</strong>tments (FME 2005; Adekola 2007; Thomas 2011). Adekola’s(2007) <str<strong>on</strong>g>review</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> four years <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> development and research <strong>in</strong> primary educati<strong>on</strong> and teacher educati<strong>on</strong>notes that most NCE graduates tra<strong>in</strong> as subject specialists aimed at sec<strong>on</strong>dary school teach<strong>in</strong>g, yet mayEDOREN – Educati<strong>on</strong> Data, Research and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria 116
- Page 1 and 2:
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON BASICED
- Page 3 and 4:
Review of
- Page 5 and 6:
Review of
- Page 7 and 8:
Review of
- Page 9 and 10:
Review of
- Page 11 and 12:
Review of
- Page 13 and 14:
Review of
- Page 15 and 16:
Review of
- Page 17 and 18:
Review of
- Page 19 and 20:
Review of
- Page 21 and 22:
Review of
- Page 23 and 24:
Review of
- Page 25 and 26:
Review of
- Page 27 and 28:
Review of
- Page 29 and 30:
Review of
- Page 31 and 32:
Review of
- Page 33 and 34:
Review of
- Page 35 and 36:
Review of
- Page 37 and 38:
Review of
- Page 39 and 40:
Review of
- Page 41 and 42:
Review of
- Page 43 and 44:
Review of
- Page 45 and 46:
Review of
- Page 47 and 48:
Review of
- Page 49 and 50:
Review of
- Page 51 and 52:
Review of
- Page 53 and 54:
Review of
- Page 55 and 56:
Review of
- Page 57 and 58:
Review of
- Page 59 and 60:
Review of
- Page 61 and 62:
Review of
- Page 63 and 64:
Review of
- Page 65 and 66:
Review of
- Page 67 and 68:
Review of
- Page 69 and 70:
Review of
- Page 71 and 72:
Review of
- Page 73 and 74:
Review of
- Page 75 and 76:
Review of
- Page 77 and 78:
Review of
- Page 79 and 80:
Review of
- Page 81 and 82:
Review of
- Page 83 and 84:
Review of
- Page 85 and 86:
Review of
- Page 87 and 88:
Review of
- Page 89 and 90:
Review of
- Page 91 and 92: Review of
- Page 93 and 94: Review of
- Page 95 and 96: Review of
- Page 97 and 98: Review of
- Page 99 and 100: Review of
- Page 101 and 102: Review of
- Page 103 and 104: Review of
- Page 105 and 106: Review of
- Page 107 and 108: Review of
- Page 109 and 110: Review of
- Page 111 and 112: Review of
- Page 113 and 114: Review of
- Page 115 and 116: Review of
- Page 117 and 118: Review of
- Page 119 and 120: Review of
- Page 121 and 122: Review of
- Page 123 and 124: Review of
- Page 125 and 126: Review of
- Page 127 and 128: Review of
- Page 129 and 130: Review of
- Page 131 and 132: Review of
- Page 133 and 134: Review of
- Page 135 and 136: Review of
- Page 137 and 138: Review of
- Page 139 and 140: Review of
- Page 141: Review of
- Page 145 and 146: Review of
- Page 147 and 148: Review of
- Page 149 and 150: Review of
- Page 151 and 152: Review of
- Page 153 and 154: Review of
- Page 155 and 156: Review of
- Page 157 and 158: Review of
- Page 159 and 160: Review of
- Page 161 and 162: Review of
- Page 163 and 164: Review of
- Page 165 and 166: Review of
- Page 167 and 168: Review of
- Page 169 and 170: Review of
- Page 171 and 172: Review of
- Page 173 and 174: Review of
- Page 175 and 176: Review of
- Page 177 and 178: Review of
- Page 179 and 180: Review of
- Page 181 and 182: Review of
- Page 183 and 184: Review of
- Page 185 and 186: Review of
- Page 187 and 188: Review of
- Page 189 and 190: Review of
- Page 191 and 192: Review of
- Page 193 and 194:
Review of
- Page 195 and 196:
Review of
- Page 197 and 198:
Review of
- Page 199 and 200:
Review of
- Page 201 and 202:
Review of
- Page 203 and 204:
Review of
- Page 205 and 206:
Review of
- Page 207 and 208:
Review of
- Page 209 and 210:
Review of