Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> NigeriaBox 2.1: Islamiyya, Qur’anic and Tsangaya Educati<strong>on</strong> 12Tsangaya is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> traditi<strong>on</strong>al Hausa name for a Qur’anic school (mean<strong>in</strong>g literally ‘study centre’).These schools are a mix <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> day schools (sometimes called Tahfeez) and board<strong>in</strong>g schools, whichtraditi<strong>on</strong>ally <strong>on</strong>ly taught <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Qur’an, although some are now be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tegrated to teach elements <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> state-approved secular curriculum. Some children at <strong>in</strong>formal IQTE schools, especially ifboard<strong>in</strong>g, need to provide for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir own subsistence, through ei<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong> farms <strong>in</strong> rural areasor by petty trad<strong>in</strong>g or begg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> urban areas.Mallam is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Hausa name for a man learned <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Qur’an.Almajiri is a corrupti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Arabic ‘almuhajirun’, for ‘emigrant’, and is used to refer to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> boyswho leave home <strong>in</strong> search <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Qur’anic learn<strong>in</strong>g under <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> tutelage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a mallam, and make <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>irlivelihood through agriculture <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> rural areas and casual labour or begg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> streets <strong>in</strong> urbanareas. Many almajirai are orphans and vulnerable children.Islamiyya is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> name for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> more modern Islamic school, which teaches a range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Islamicdiscipl<strong>in</strong>es, not just <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Qur’an. Most Islamiyya schools are privately owned by <strong>in</strong>dividuals,communities or societies. Some are ‘<strong>in</strong>tegrated’ and teach a state-approved curriculum <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>gsecular subjects. These schools are counted <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficial statistics (both adm<strong>in</strong>istrative data and surveydata).Sources: Hoechner 2011; Ant<strong>on</strong><strong>in</strong>is 2012; ESSPIN Brief<strong>in</strong>g Note 8 n.d.; Yusha’u et al. 2013.A particular issue with Islamic educati<strong>on</strong> is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> almajirai – young boys liv<strong>in</strong>g and study<strong>in</strong>g with anit<strong>in</strong>erant mallam and provid<strong>in</strong>g for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir own subsistence through farm<strong>in</strong>g, begg<strong>in</strong>g or hawk<strong>in</strong>g (see Box2.1 and Secti<strong>on</strong> 8.6.2). There are currently an estimated 9.5 milli<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria, accord<strong>in</strong>g to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ExecutiveSecretary <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> UBEC (Umejei 2011), with 8.5 milli<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> those <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> north (Hoechner 2011) and around300,000 (12.5% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all 6–21-year-olds) <strong>in</strong> Kano al<strong>on</strong>e (Kano SMoE 2008). Many state governments havebanned <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> practice <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> begg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> streets and are establish<strong>in</strong>g Almajirai Integrated Schools withgovernment fund<strong>in</strong>g (Yusha’u et al. 2013). Fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r details <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se are given <strong>in</strong> Secti<strong>on</strong> 7.5.2.5.3 Poverty and nutriti<strong>on</strong>School attendance is str<strong>on</strong>gly associated with poverty (L<strong>in</strong>cove 2009; Morgan et al. 2010; NPC and RTIInternati<strong>on</strong>al 2011), with children from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> poorest qu<strong>in</strong>tile hav<strong>in</strong>g just 30% NARs, compared to 82% for<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> richest qu<strong>in</strong>tile (NPC and RTI Internati<strong>on</strong>al 2011). This is also reflected <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> correlati<strong>on</strong> betweenschool attendance and nutriti<strong>on</strong>. OOSC who have never attended school are twice as likely to be stuntedas children who have some pre-school or primary educati<strong>on</strong>, and twice as likely to be wasted andunderweight as children who have some primary educati<strong>on</strong> (NPC and RTI Internati<strong>on</strong>al 2011: 39; seealso Secti<strong>on</strong> 9.5). The 2010 NEDS hypo<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>sised that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> cessati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Home Grown School Feed<strong>in</strong>gProgramme <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> majority <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> states might have been a major c<strong>on</strong>tributory factor <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>crease<strong>in</strong> school attendance between 2004 and 2010 (NPC and RTI Internati<strong>on</strong>al 2011; see also Secti<strong>on</strong> 9.5).2.5.4 Orphans and vulnerable childrenThere are an estimated 17.5 milli<strong>on</strong> orphans and vulnerable children (OVCs) aged 6–17 <strong>in</strong> Nigeria(FMWASD 2008), <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> which 10 milli<strong>on</strong> are orphans and 7.5 milli<strong>on</strong> vulnerable (i.e. children with<strong>in</strong>adequate care, with chr<strong>on</strong>ically ill parents or caregivers, liv<strong>in</strong>g outside <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> family care, or <strong>in</strong>fected withHIV).12Sometimes also referred to as Integrated Islamic, Qur’anic and Tsangaya Educati<strong>on</strong>.EDOREN – Educati<strong>on</strong> Data, Research and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria 19
Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> NigeriaA USAID-funded study (Bost<strong>on</strong> University, 2009) found that primary attendance rates for OVCs arearound 60%, roughly <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 61%. OVCs, though, may be more likely to beabsent from school more <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten if <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y have more resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities at home, need to earn <strong>in</strong>come orprovide care, and are more likely to be ill <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>mselves (ibid.).The prevalence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> OVCs is similar <strong>in</strong> rural and urban sett<strong>in</strong>gs, although <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are significant regi<strong>on</strong>al andstate-level differences (Samuels et al. 2012).2.5.5 AbsenteeismIt is important to note that, although pupils may be reported <strong>in</strong> surveys as attend<strong>in</strong>g school,absenteeism is high. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2010 NEDS <strong>on</strong>ly 80% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pupils <strong>on</strong> average attend all school days.Those who do not attend all days miss an average <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 5.5 days per m<strong>on</strong>th at primary level and 5.1 days atsec<strong>on</strong>dary level (NPC and RTI Internati<strong>on</strong>al 2011), which equates to around a quarter <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> school time.Absenteeism is similar for females and males but is higher <strong>in</strong> rural than <strong>in</strong> urban areas, for poorer thanricher children, and varies substantially by z<strong>on</strong>e (e.g. 5% <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> South West but 31% <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North East)(NPC and RTI Internati<strong>on</strong>al 2011).However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se figures are likely to be an underestimati<strong>on</strong> ei<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r because parents may not knowwhe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r children have been absent from school (see Dunne et al. 2013) and/or because children maynot want to admit to hav<strong>in</strong>g been absent from school if <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> reas<strong>on</strong> is not perceived as legitimate, i.e.when play<strong>in</strong>g truant. On <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> days when USAID’s EGRA and EGMA assessments were carried out <strong>in</strong> asample <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> primary schools across Bauchi and Sokoto states, 30% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> public school pupils <strong>in</strong> Bauchi wereabsent and 60% were absent <strong>in</strong> Sokoto (USAID 2013 b & c). Rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> absenteeism were slightly lower <strong>in</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> IQTE schools <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sample (ibid.)In additi<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> observed tendency for pupils to drift away from school <strong>in</strong> afterno<strong>on</strong> shifts, <strong>on</strong> marketdays and/or from unfenced schools, as reported <strong>in</strong> smaller, school-based qualitative studies (e.g.Boult<strong>on</strong> et al. 2009; UNICEF 2009a; Dunne et al. 2013), also raises questi<strong>on</strong>s about <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> actual amount <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>time pupils who are technically attend<strong>in</strong>g school are actually <strong>in</strong> school.Absenteeism is important both because children are <strong>in</strong>evitably not engaged <strong>in</strong> formal learn<strong>in</strong>g when not<strong>in</strong> school but also because absenteeism is <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten a precursor to dropp<strong>in</strong>g out (Lew<strong>in</strong> and Sabates 2011).2.6 DropoutsDropout rates, as def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2010 NEDS, are <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> percentage <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> children <strong>in</strong> a grade <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> previousyear who are not now attend<strong>in</strong>g school (NPC and RTI Internati<strong>on</strong>al 2011). Analys<strong>in</strong>g 2008 NDHS data,<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al study <strong>on</strong> OOSC (UNICEF/UIS 2012) estimates that while 5% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> primary school-age childrendrop out <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> primary, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> JSS-age dropouts is 20%.The 2010 NEDS shows that primary school dropout rates are fairly low and c<strong>on</strong>centrated am<strong>on</strong>g Primary6 students. The study <strong>on</strong> Nigeria’s OOSC argues, however, that <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> reas<strong>on</strong>s dropout is relativelylow is because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> high number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> children out <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> school <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> first place (UNICEF/UIS 2012). Even so,accord<strong>in</strong>g to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2010 NEDS, dropout rates for Primary 6 have improved s<strong>in</strong>ce 2004, fall<strong>in</strong>g from anoverall level <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 17% to 11% (NPC and RTI Internati<strong>on</strong>al 2011).Dropout rates are less than 0.5% for Primary 1 to 5, but are 11% for Primary 6 (NPC and RTIInternati<strong>on</strong>al 2011). However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2010 NEDS report also po<strong>in</strong>ts out that this much larger figure is alsolikely to <strong>in</strong>clude ‘push outs’, i.e. pupils who ord<strong>in</strong>arily would have g<strong>on</strong>e <strong>on</strong> to JSS had <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re been anadequate supply <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sec<strong>on</strong>dary schools. The report supports this hypo<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>sis by po<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g out that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>dropout rate is substantially higher <strong>in</strong> rural areas, where <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> supply <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> JSSs is much sparser. On <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rhand, under 10% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all dropouts (albeit across <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> grade spectrum) cited <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>ability to attend a JSS as aEDOREN – Educati<strong>on</strong> Data, Research and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria 20
- Page 1 and 2: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON BASICED
- Page 3 and 4: Review of
- Page 5 and 6: Review of
- Page 7 and 8: Review of
- Page 9 and 10: Review of
- Page 11 and 12: Review of
- Page 13 and 14: Review of
- Page 15 and 16: Review of
- Page 17 and 18: Review of
- Page 19 and 20: Review of
- Page 21 and 22: Review of
- Page 23 and 24: Review of
- Page 25 and 26: Review of
- Page 27 and 28: Review of
- Page 29 and 30: Review of
- Page 31 and 32: Review of
- Page 33 and 34: Review of
- Page 35 and 36: Review of
- Page 37 and 38: Review of
- Page 39 and 40: Review of
- Page 41 and 42: Review of
- Page 43 and 44: Review of
- Page 45: Review of
- Page 49 and 50: Review of
- Page 51 and 52: Review of
- Page 53 and 54: Review of
- Page 55 and 56: Review of
- Page 57 and 58: Review of
- Page 59 and 60: Review of
- Page 61 and 62: Review of
- Page 63 and 64: Review of
- Page 65 and 66: Review of
- Page 67 and 68: Review of
- Page 69 and 70: Review of
- Page 71 and 72: Review of
- Page 73 and 74: Review of
- Page 75 and 76: Review of
- Page 77 and 78: Review of
- Page 79 and 80: Review of
- Page 81 and 82: Review of
- Page 83 and 84: Review of
- Page 85 and 86: Review of
- Page 87 and 88: Review of
- Page 89 and 90: Review of
- Page 91 and 92: Review of
- Page 93 and 94: Review of
- Page 95 and 96: Review of
- Page 97 and 98:
Review of
- Page 99 and 100:
Review of
- Page 101 and 102:
Review of
- Page 103 and 104:
Review of
- Page 105 and 106:
Review of
- Page 107 and 108:
Review of
- Page 109 and 110:
Review of
- Page 111 and 112:
Review of
- Page 113 and 114:
Review of
- Page 115 and 116:
Review of
- Page 117 and 118:
Review of
- Page 119 and 120:
Review of
- Page 121 and 122:
Review of
- Page 123 and 124:
Review of
- Page 125 and 126:
Review of
- Page 127 and 128:
Review of
- Page 129 and 130:
Review of
- Page 131 and 132:
Review of
- Page 133 and 134:
Review of
- Page 135 and 136:
Review of
- Page 137 and 138:
Review of
- Page 139 and 140:
Review of
- Page 141 and 142:
Review of
- Page 143 and 144:
Review of
- Page 145 and 146:
Review of
- Page 147 and 148:
Review of
- Page 149 and 150:
Review of
- Page 151 and 152:
Review of
- Page 153 and 154:
Review of
- Page 155 and 156:
Review of
- Page 157 and 158:
Review of
- Page 159 and 160:
Review of
- Page 161 and 162:
Review of
- Page 163 and 164:
Review of
- Page 165 and 166:
Review of
- Page 167 and 168:
Review of
- Page 169 and 170:
Review of
- Page 171 and 172:
Review of
- Page 173 and 174:
Review of
- Page 175 and 176:
Review of
- Page 177 and 178:
Review of
- Page 179 and 180:
Review of
- Page 181 and 182:
Review of
- Page 183 and 184:
Review of
- Page 185 and 186:
Review of
- Page 187 and 188:
Review of
- Page 189 and 190:
Review of
- Page 191 and 192:
Review of
- Page 193 and 194:
Review of
- Page 195 and 196:
Review of
- Page 197 and 198:
Review of
- Page 199 and 200:
Review of
- Page 201 and 202:
Review of
- Page 203 and 204:
Review of
- Page 205 and 206:
Review of
- Page 207 and 208:
Review of
- Page 209 and 210:
Review of