Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeriaand outcomes to be measured aga<strong>in</strong>st programme targets and to facilitate impact assessments. Evenwhere qualitative data were ga<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>red <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y were <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n quantified.Fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rmore, articles <strong>in</strong> nati<strong>on</strong>al journals generally lack an empirical basis or report small-scale surveys<strong>on</strong> very specific issues.There are very few <strong>in</strong>-depth qualitative studies. More <strong>in</strong>-depth qualitative data (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g ethnographic,l<strong>on</strong>gitud<strong>in</strong>al and comparative case-study research) are needed to unravel some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> more complexprocesses affect<strong>in</strong>g children <strong>in</strong> particular social c<strong>on</strong>texts h<strong>in</strong>ted at <strong>in</strong> some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> survey data.Research <strong>on</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria would benefit from greater collaborati<strong>on</strong> and synergy betweenNigerian university academics work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> and educati<strong>on</strong> and development specialists (bothNigerian and <strong>in</strong>ternati<strong>on</strong>al).Greater public availability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> government policy documentati<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> (e.g. statistics, policydocuments, research reports and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> M<strong>on</strong>itor<strong>in</strong>g Learn<strong>in</strong>g Achievement (MLA) exercise data) would alsohelp improve research.Geographical coverage <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> available research (outside nati<strong>on</strong>al surveys) has been uneven, with somestates hardly featur<strong>in</strong>g.With <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> two notable excepti<strong>on</strong>s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> voices <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> women and children and marg<strong>in</strong>alised groups such asnomadic pastoralists, almajirai, 1 street children, and children with disabilities are not <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten very wellheard <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> evaluati<strong>on</strong> studies, <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten because <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re was a tendency to focus <strong>on</strong> ‘key <strong>in</strong>formants’ such asstate and Local LGEA <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficials, traditi<strong>on</strong>al leaders and head teachers, who are predom<strong>in</strong>antly men fromdom<strong>in</strong>ant social groups.S<strong>in</strong>ce <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> drive at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> school level has been to get more children – particularly girls – <strong>in</strong>to schools, lessresearch attenti<strong>on</strong> has been given to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> quality <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>in</strong> both schools and teachereducati<strong>on</strong> colleges. However, <strong>in</strong>creased school enrolments mean very little if no mean<strong>in</strong>gful learn<strong>in</strong>g istak<strong>in</strong>g place.There are also c<strong>on</strong>cerns about <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> f<strong>in</strong>ancial susta<strong>in</strong>ability and political will to susta<strong>in</strong> many <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>educati<strong>on</strong> development programmes.2. ACCESS TO BASIC EDUCATIONEMIS data suggest an overall decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> primary enrolments from 2006 to 2010 (<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> latest available datanati<strong>on</strong>ally), except <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North West. In c<strong>on</strong>trast, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> data suggest an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> public JuniorSec<strong>on</strong>dary School (JSS) enrolments. That said, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> figures are unreliable and much <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> private schooldata <strong>in</strong> particular are absent. Household survey data from between 2004 and 2010 suggest little change<strong>in</strong> primary attendance, at around 60% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> school-age children nati<strong>on</strong>ally, although <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is c<strong>on</strong>siderablevariati<strong>on</strong> across <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> country.Broadly speak<strong>in</strong>g, attendance is lower <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> north than <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> south, <strong>in</strong> rural areas ra<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than urban,for poorer households than richer, for girls more than boys <strong>in</strong> nor<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn states, for Muslims more thann<strong>on</strong>-Muslims, and for nomadic and migrant children and children with disabilities. Enrolment data fromEducati<strong>on</strong> Sector Support Programme <strong>in</strong> Nigeria (ESSPIN)-supported states show huge variati<strong>on</strong>between states and with<strong>in</strong> states between LGEAs.1While <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> term orig<strong>in</strong>ally derives from a corrupti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Arabic ‘almuhajirun’, which means ‘migrant’, referr<strong>in</strong>g to boys whowould leave home <strong>in</strong> search <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Qur’anic learn<strong>in</strong>g, it has been debased <strong>in</strong> comm<strong>on</strong> speech <strong>in</strong> Nigeria to refer to Muslim boysbegg<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> street.EDOREN – Educati<strong>on</strong> Data, Research and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeriaiii
Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> NigeriaQualitative data suggest that <strong>in</strong> some states enrolments are <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g follow<strong>in</strong>g social mobilisati<strong>on</strong> andschool development efforts.The 2010 Nigeria Educati<strong>on</strong> Data Survey (NEDS) suggested that formal dropout and repetiti<strong>on</strong> are notlarge problems, although o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r studies’ data suggest <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> NEDS figures are gross under-representati<strong>on</strong>s.That said, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2010 NEDS and o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r studies have shown pupil absenteeism to be a major issue,especially <strong>in</strong> rural areas.The 2010 NEDS stated that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ma<strong>in</strong> reas<strong>on</strong>s parents and guardians gave for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir primary-aged childrenhav<strong>in</strong>g never attended school were <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> distance to school, child labour needs at home, and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m<strong>on</strong>etary costs. O<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r comm<strong>on</strong> factors were <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> percepti<strong>on</strong> that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> child was too young or immatureto attend school, and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> poor quality <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> schools.Out-<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>-school factors c<strong>on</strong>tribut<strong>in</strong>g to n<strong>on</strong>-enrolment, absenteeism and/or dropout from schools <strong>in</strong>clude:illness or hunger; <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> need to do paid/unpaid work (<strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g car<strong>in</strong>g for sibl<strong>in</strong>gs and sick relatives); an<strong>in</strong>ability to pay school costs and fees; lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> uniforms or o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r materials; and parental attitudes.In-school factors c<strong>on</strong>tribut<strong>in</strong>g to n<strong>on</strong>-enrolment, absenteeism and/or dropout from schools are relatedto quality and generally revolve around: poor <strong>in</strong>frastructure and facilities; lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> space or overcrowd<strong>in</strong>g;teacher absenteeism; pupil avoidance <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> harassment, bully<strong>in</strong>g or corporal punishment; an <strong>in</strong>ability tounderstand <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> medium <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> (MOI); and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> poor quality <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g tak<strong>in</strong>g place.The quantitative data are generally <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> poor quality, but are particularly sparse <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> case <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>unregistered private schools, Islamic schools and nomadic educati<strong>on</strong>.There is not a good understand<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> what <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> most important barriers to access are (‘out-<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>-school’and ‘<strong>in</strong>-school’ factors) <strong>in</strong> specific c<strong>on</strong>texts and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> way <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y <strong>in</strong>terrelate.3. EDUCATIONAL QUALITY: THE SCHOOL CONTEXTSchool supplyMany states have recently been <strong>in</strong>vest<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> build<strong>in</strong>g new schools. However, accord<strong>in</strong>g to EMIS data,<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are no clear patterns <strong>on</strong> school supply nati<strong>on</strong>ally from 2006 to 2010, although <strong>in</strong> part this isbecause <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lack and/or unreliability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> data <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> schools. Data for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> private sector, <strong>in</strong>particular, are miss<strong>in</strong>g for many states. However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2010 NEDS reported l<strong>on</strong>g distances for manychildren <strong>in</strong> more rural and nor<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn areas, especially at sec<strong>on</strong>dary level, thus suggest<strong>in</strong>g school supplyissues.School <strong>in</strong>frastructure and facilitiesMany states have <strong>in</strong>vested heavily <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> development <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> educati<strong>on</strong>al <strong>in</strong>frastructure over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> last fewyears, although progress has been uneven. Many schools are still dilapidated, <strong>in</strong> part becausegovernment fund<strong>in</strong>g is unevenly distributed am<strong>on</strong>g states, LGEAs and schools – some schools receive nogovernment support – and it is widely claimed that a lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> transparency <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> award<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>c<strong>on</strong>structi<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tracts can lead to sub-standard build<strong>in</strong>gs.The provisi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> water and gender-segregated sanitati<strong>on</strong> is clearly vital to keep<strong>in</strong>g pupils (and staff) <strong>in</strong>schools, and reports suggest recent improvements <strong>in</strong> provisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> project-supported states, but <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>reare clearly issues around <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ma<strong>in</strong>tenance and cleanl<strong>in</strong>ess <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> both. These need to be <strong>in</strong>vestigated morethoroughly, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> shared community use, fee charges for water, safety for girls aroundtoilet areas, and hygiene and equity issues surround<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> clean<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> toilets. The reas<strong>on</strong>s why childrenare not us<strong>in</strong>g toilets <strong>in</strong> some cases also need to be explored.EDOREN – Educati<strong>on</strong> Data, Research and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeriaiv
- Page 1 and 2: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON BASICED
- Page 3: Review of
- Page 7 and 8: Review of
- Page 9 and 10: Review of
- Page 11 and 12: Review of
- Page 13 and 14: Review of
- Page 15 and 16: Review of
- Page 17 and 18: Review of
- Page 19 and 20: Review of
- Page 21 and 22: Review of
- Page 23 and 24: Review of
- Page 25 and 26: Review of
- Page 27 and 28: Review of
- Page 29 and 30: Review of
- Page 31 and 32: Review of
- Page 33 and 34: Review of
- Page 35 and 36: Review of
- Page 37 and 38: Review of
- Page 39 and 40: Review of
- Page 41 and 42: Review of
- Page 43 and 44: Review of
- Page 45 and 46: Review of
- Page 47 and 48: Review of
- Page 49 and 50: Review of
- Page 51 and 52: Review of
- Page 53 and 54: Review of
- Page 55 and 56:
Review of
- Page 57 and 58:
Review of
- Page 59 and 60:
Review of
- Page 61 and 62:
Review of
- Page 63 and 64:
Review of
- Page 65 and 66:
Review of
- Page 67 and 68:
Review of
- Page 69 and 70:
Review of
- Page 71 and 72:
Review of
- Page 73 and 74:
Review of
- Page 75 and 76:
Review of
- Page 77 and 78:
Review of
- Page 79 and 80:
Review of
- Page 81 and 82:
Review of
- Page 83 and 84:
Review of
- Page 85 and 86:
Review of
- Page 87 and 88:
Review of
- Page 89 and 90:
Review of
- Page 91 and 92:
Review of
- Page 93 and 94:
Review of
- Page 95 and 96:
Review of
- Page 97 and 98:
Review of
- Page 99 and 100:
Review of
- Page 101 and 102:
Review of
- Page 103 and 104:
Review of
- Page 105 and 106:
Review of
- Page 107 and 108:
Review of
- Page 109 and 110:
Review of
- Page 111 and 112:
Review of
- Page 113 and 114:
Review of
- Page 115 and 116:
Review of
- Page 117 and 118:
Review of
- Page 119 and 120:
Review of
- Page 121 and 122:
Review of
- Page 123 and 124:
Review of
- Page 125 and 126:
Review of
- Page 127 and 128:
Review of
- Page 129 and 130:
Review of
- Page 131 and 132:
Review of
- Page 133 and 134:
Review of
- Page 135 and 136:
Review of
- Page 137 and 138:
Review of
- Page 139 and 140:
Review of
- Page 141 and 142:
Review of
- Page 143 and 144:
Review of
- Page 145 and 146:
Review of
- Page 147 and 148:
Review of
- Page 149 and 150:
Review of
- Page 151 and 152:
Review of
- Page 153 and 154:
Review of
- Page 155 and 156:
Review of
- Page 157 and 158:
Review of
- Page 159 and 160:
Review of
- Page 161 and 162:
Review of
- Page 163 and 164:
Review of
- Page 165 and 166:
Review of
- Page 167 and 168:
Review of
- Page 169 and 170:
Review of
- Page 171 and 172:
Review of
- Page 173 and 174:
Review of
- Page 175 and 176:
Review of
- Page 177 and 178:
Review of
- Page 179 and 180:
Review of
- Page 181 and 182:
Review of
- Page 183 and 184:
Review of
- Page 185 and 186:
Review of
- Page 187 and 188:
Review of
- Page 189 and 190:
Review of
- Page 191 and 192:
Review of
- Page 193 and 194:
Review of
- Page 195 and 196:
Review of
- Page 197 and 198:
Review of
- Page 199 and 200:
Review of
- Page 201 and 202:
Review of
- Page 203 and 204:
Review of
- Page 205 and 206:
Review of
- Page 207 and 208:
Review of
- Page 209 and 210:
Review of