12.07.2015 Views

review-of-the-literature-on-basic-education-in-nigeria-june-2014-3-1

review-of-the-literature-on-basic-education-in-nigeria-june-2014-3-1

review-of-the-literature-on-basic-education-in-nigeria-june-2014-3-1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> NigeriaCHAPTER 3: EDUCATIONAL QUALITY – THE SCHOOL CONTEXT3.1 Introducti<strong>on</strong>This chapter is essentially c<strong>on</strong>cerned with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>text <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> school quality, specifically with schoolavailability, school <strong>in</strong>frastructure and material resources, which toge<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r provide <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> learn<strong>in</strong>genvir<strong>on</strong>ment for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> curricular issues and learn<strong>in</strong>g processes c<strong>on</strong>sidered <strong>in</strong> Chapter 4. We draw <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>2010 NEDS, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2004 ESA, and <strong>on</strong> a range <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> quantitative and qualitative studies.In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2010 NEDS ‘poor school quality’ 13 was a factor for 16.8% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> children never attend<strong>in</strong>g school, afigure that was much <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same for urban and rural populati<strong>on</strong>s but exceeded 20% for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> poorestwealth qu<strong>in</strong>tile and was highest <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North East (28.6%). It was also a factor <strong>in</strong> primary school pupildropout – although <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> numbers <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> dropouts were generally low – particularly <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North East andNorth West (NPC and RTI Internati<strong>on</strong>al 2011). C<strong>on</strong>versely, good-quality new <strong>in</strong>frastructure has beenshown to improve pupil enrolment at primary level (Takahashi 2010; Dunne et al. 2013).The 2010 NEDS also suggested that <strong>in</strong>-school factors are important determ<strong>in</strong>ants <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pupil absenteeism.After illness, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sec<strong>on</strong>d most cited reas<strong>on</strong> given for absenteeism was that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> child ‘did not want to goto school’, which applied nati<strong>on</strong>ally to around a fifth <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all pupils (21.7%), with over twice as manychildren not want<strong>in</strong>g to go to public schools (24%) as private schools (11%); fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rmore, this was morepr<strong>on</strong>ounced <strong>in</strong> rural areas than <strong>in</strong> urban areas. Not want<strong>in</strong>g to go to school might <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore suggestc<strong>on</strong>cerns with school quality, which may relate to poor <strong>in</strong>frastructure and resources, as discussed <strong>in</strong> thischapter, or may have more to do with curriculum relevance and/or <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> processes <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> teach<strong>in</strong>g andlearn<strong>in</strong>g (see Chapter 4), or teacher–pupil and pupil–pupil relati<strong>on</strong>s (see secti<strong>on</strong>s 4.6 and 4.7).3.2 School supply3.2.1 School availabilitySchool supply has an impact <strong>on</strong> both pupil access, because distance to school is a major factor <strong>in</strong>children’s n<strong>on</strong>-enrolment, and <strong>on</strong> school quality, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>in</strong>sufficient schools to satisfy demand forschool<strong>in</strong>g can lead to overcrowded classrooms (NPC and RTI Internati<strong>on</strong>al 2011). Table 3.1 shows recenttrends at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> z<strong>on</strong>al level <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> supply <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> public primary schools. Patterns for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> four-year period aremixed, with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> schools ris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2007/08 before dropp<strong>in</strong>g aga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2009/10 <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> NorthWest, South South and South East, ris<strong>in</strong>g steadily <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North East and North Central, and dropp<strong>in</strong>gsteadily <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> South West. Drops <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> schools, however, are perhaps not surpris<strong>in</strong>g if <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>fall<strong>in</strong>g numbers <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> public primary enrolments <strong>in</strong> some regi<strong>on</strong>s over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same period are actually correct(see Secti<strong>on</strong> 2.3). However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is variati<strong>on</strong> am<strong>on</strong>g states. In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> South West, for example, whichshows an overall decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> public primary schools, Osun and Ogun states never<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>less both post<strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> public primary schools.More importantly, perhaps, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> statistics need to be treated with extreme cauti<strong>on</strong>. Some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> stateleveldata show <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> schools ris<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2007/08 and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n dropp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> 2009/10 (e.g. from 1,325to 2,885, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>n 1,967 <strong>in</strong> Sokoto, or from 1,029 to 1,367 to 1,038 <strong>in</strong> Anambra), which seems unlikely. Evenmore unlikely, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> digest <strong>in</strong>dicates that Ondo State lost 809 primary schools between 2007/08 and2011/12. What is more, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ASC figures <strong>in</strong> FME (2011b) for Kaduna and Kwara for 2009 to 2010 (4,341and 1,658, respectively), to take just two examples, are not <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> figures quoted <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>irrespective state ASC, at 3,956 and 1,448 respectively (Kaduna SMoE 2010; Kwara SMoE 2010).13School quality was assessed <strong>in</strong> reference to <strong>on</strong>e or more <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> follow<strong>in</strong>g: teachers not perform<strong>in</strong>g well, lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pupil safety,poor quality build<strong>in</strong>gs and facilities, and classroom overcrowd<strong>in</strong>g.EDOREN – Educati<strong>on</strong> Data, Research and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria 24

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!