Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> NigeriaThe nati<strong>on</strong>al study <strong>on</strong> teachers’ voice <strong>in</strong>dicated teachers will <strong>on</strong>ly respect and cooperate with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> headteacher if <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y th<strong>in</strong>k <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> head teacher has been appo<strong>in</strong>ted <strong>on</strong> merit, which many compla<strong>in</strong>ed was not<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> case (Sherry 2008; see also Dunne et al. 2013). C<strong>on</strong>versely, when teachers have powerful c<strong>on</strong>tacts,head teachers may have little c<strong>on</strong>trol over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m (Williams 2009).11.2.2 Head teachers’ remunerati<strong>on</strong> and motivati<strong>on</strong>Although head teachers may receive no extra remunerati<strong>on</strong> for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> post, some receive a stipend from<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> SUBEB or LGEA <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> states (Williams 2009), and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re have been calls <strong>in</strong> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r states to dolikewise (Dunne et al. 2013). There have also been reports <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> some teachers seek<strong>in</strong>g headships <strong>in</strong> orderto grant <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>mselves an allowance from PTA funds (Williams 2009). It is not known whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lowsalary and lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> extra <strong>in</strong>come for leadership resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities affects head teacher motivati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>same way that it affects teacher motivati<strong>on</strong>, although <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> external evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> COMPASSprogramme described <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> head teachers <strong>in</strong> all <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> schools <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y visited as ‘lacklustre’ (Holfeld et al.2008).11.2.3 Head teachers’ roles and resp<strong>on</strong>sibilitiesThe job <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> head teacher <strong>in</strong> practice is primarily adm<strong>in</strong>istrative. An ESSPIN study <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> daily life <strong>in</strong> 20state primary schools <strong>in</strong> Kwara, Kaduna and Kano states, which <strong>in</strong>cluded track<strong>in</strong>g head teachers, foundthat <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y spent most time fill<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> forms, check<strong>in</strong>g teachers’ registers, etc., and were <strong>on</strong>ly usually <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>classroom to check that teachers were present and that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir teach<strong>in</strong>g was factually accurate (Boult<strong>on</strong>et al. 2009). This focus <strong>on</strong> bureaucracy and adm<strong>in</strong>istrati<strong>on</strong> ra<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than pedagogy has also been noted <strong>in</strong>o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r studies (e.g. Williams 2009; Dunne et al. 2013).That said, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2004 ESA survey <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> head teachers clearly <strong>in</strong>dicated <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> need for improved record-keep<strong>in</strong>g,given <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>in</strong>ternal <strong>in</strong>c<strong>on</strong>sistencies <strong>in</strong> some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> data provided (e.g. <strong>on</strong> school transfers; see Secti<strong>on</strong>2.6.1) and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> record-keep<strong>in</strong>g by some head teachers. Under 80% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> head teachers kept teacherattendance registers, a similar percentage kept class attendance registers and just over 80% heldadmissi<strong>on</strong>s registers (FME 2005). Given that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se form <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> basis for nati<strong>on</strong>al EMIS data this is worry<strong>in</strong>g.Moreover, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> quality <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> record-keep<strong>in</strong>g is not known.The allocati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> teacher resp<strong>on</strong>sibilities with<strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> school is someth<strong>in</strong>g head teachers have <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>authority to do, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> appo<strong>in</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> assistant head teacher(s) (Thomas 2011; Dunne et al.2013) (although <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se positi<strong>on</strong>s also come without extra recompense). While <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re is little research <strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> topic, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> case-study research <strong>in</strong> Adamawa and Kogi states suggests a tendency to genderstereotype<strong>in</strong> duty allocati<strong>on</strong>, with male teachers <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten appo<strong>in</strong>ted as assistant head teachers and left <strong>in</strong>charge <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> discipl<strong>in</strong>e and school labour whereas female teachers were more likely to be <strong>in</strong> charge <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>health. This <strong>in</strong>evitably holds implicati<strong>on</strong>s for gender equality am<strong>on</strong>g teachers and for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> gendermessages be<strong>in</strong>g transmitted to pupils (Bakari 2013; Dunne et al. 2013; see also Secti<strong>on</strong> 8.7).11.2.4 Head teachers’ management stylesIn terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> head teacher management styles, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al teachers’ voice study (Sherry 2008) reportedthat some teachers wanted <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> head teacher to <strong>in</strong>volve <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m more <strong>in</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong>-mak<strong>in</strong>g, o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rs wantedhead teachers to be less dependent <strong>on</strong> staff <strong>in</strong>put, and many thought head teachers were too tyrannicaland reported cases <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> bully<strong>in</strong>g and verbal abuse. There were also compla<strong>in</strong>ts by some teachers about alack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> support from head teachers <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> face <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> dissatisfied parents, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g stories <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> parentscompla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g about student exam marks result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> head teachers upgrad<strong>in</strong>g failures to passes (Sherry2008). A survey study <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> head teacher leadership styles <strong>in</strong> all 281 senior sec<strong>on</strong>dary schools <strong>in</strong> Ondo Statefound that over two-thirds <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> teachers (68.4%, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g head teachers) thought that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir headteachers adopted a ‘democratic’ leadership style, with a much smaller proporti<strong>on</strong> characteris<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>style as ‘laissez-faire’ and an even smaller proporti<strong>on</strong> characteris<strong>in</strong>g it as ‘autocratic’. There were str<strong>on</strong>gEDOREN – Educati<strong>on</strong> Data, Research and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria 129
Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeriacorrelati<strong>on</strong>s between perceived teacher competence and performance and autocratic or democraticleadership styles, but not with laissez-faire.11.2.5 Head teachers’ tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gCPD, which head teachers and assistant head teachers can reportedly access, tends to focus <strong>on</strong>adm<strong>in</strong>istrati<strong>on</strong> ra<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than <strong>on</strong> how to develop <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> school or support learn<strong>in</strong>g (Boult<strong>on</strong> et al. 2009). In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>large-scale survey <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> head teachers for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2004 ESA, just under half stated that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir most urgenttra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g need was <strong>in</strong> school management (FME 2005). Only just over a quarter <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> head teacherssurveyed had had any <strong>in</strong>ducti<strong>on</strong> for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> job. Although over 40% had attended some job-relatedworkshop, <strong>on</strong>ly 14% had received any management tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, 3% had been tra<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> record-keep<strong>in</strong>g,and <strong>on</strong>ly 1.4% <strong>in</strong> school development and plann<strong>in</strong>g. Thirteen percent said <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y had never received anytra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g. Many head teachers reported that as well as boost<strong>in</strong>g morale <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g had improved <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ircommunicati<strong>on</strong> skills with parents (ibid.).The Nati<strong>on</strong>al Institute for Educati<strong>on</strong>al Plann<strong>in</strong>g and Adm<strong>in</strong>istrati<strong>on</strong> was established <strong>in</strong> Ondo, Ondo State,to tra<strong>in</strong> those who want a career <strong>in</strong> educati<strong>on</strong>al plann<strong>in</strong>g but, accord<strong>in</strong>g to Arikewuyo (2009), it <strong>on</strong>lyprovides occasi<strong>on</strong>al workshops and sem<strong>in</strong>ars ra<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r than <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lengthier and more thorough tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>job requires <strong>in</strong> reality.Head teachers that have had some tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g have reported feel<strong>in</strong>g more comfortable <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir jobs andgenerally c<strong>on</strong>sider <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>mselves to be better appreciated by teachers (Sherry 2008). In additi<strong>on</strong>, headteachers are reportedly <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten more aware than teachers that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> quality <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> teach<strong>in</strong>g and learn<strong>in</strong>g is low<strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> school, but <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y <strong>on</strong>ly have ‘limited views’ <strong>on</strong> how to improve matters (Adekola 2007).The recent and c<strong>on</strong>t<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g decentralisati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> educati<strong>on</strong>, however, underl<strong>in</strong>es <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> need for headteachers to acquire new management and leadership skills (W<strong>in</strong>kler and Gershberg 2003), which severalstudies have noted are <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten lack<strong>in</strong>g (FME 2005; Holfeld et al. 2008; Arikewuyo 2009; Little and Lewis2012; UNICEF 2012; Dunne et al. 2013).Various development programmes have <strong>in</strong>cluded head teacher development tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, generally <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>form <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a series <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>e-day workshops (e.g. ESSPIN – see ESSPIN, 2013a; COMPASS – see USAID 2009;GEP – see Chege et al. 2008; UNICEF 2012), <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong> book-keep<strong>in</strong>g, school data collecti<strong>on</strong> andmanagement, development <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> SDPs, teacher development and supervisi<strong>on</strong>, gender-awareness and<strong>in</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong>, and work<strong>in</strong>g with communities. However, <strong>in</strong> ESSPIN’s mid-term <str<strong>on</strong>g>review</str<strong>on</strong>g> (ESSPIN 2013a), headteacher effectiveness was adjudged to have been <strong>on</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> least successful elements <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>programme to date. Despite hav<strong>in</strong>g access to up to 16 days <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>on</strong> academic leadership, <strong>on</strong>ly 24%<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Phase 1 head teachers satisfied five out <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> seven criteria <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> assessment, to be deemed ‘effective’,although this was better than <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> figure for head teachers <strong>in</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trol schools (11%). Only 24% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Phase Ischools managed to produce an up-to-date cashbook, although aga<strong>in</strong> that was c<strong>on</strong>siderably better than<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 15% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>trol schools. Similarly, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> GEP I evaluati<strong>on</strong> noted that, despite tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g, head teacherswere still struggl<strong>in</strong>g to keep accurate and accessible accounts and enrolment data (Chege et al. 2008).11.3 School development plansSDPs have become an <strong>in</strong>tegral part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> decentralised school improvement drive and fall under <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>head teacher’s resp<strong>on</strong>sibility, <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ten be<strong>in</strong>g developed toge<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> SBMC (<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> which <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> head teacheris a member). Fund<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> form <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> small grants from government and/or IDPs is usually attached to<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> SDP <strong>in</strong> order to carry out development activities.One major positive effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> head teacher <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> SDPs appears to be <strong>on</strong> motivati<strong>on</strong>: headteachers reported feel<strong>in</strong>g motivated and empowered to effect change at school through <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> grant andSDP system and to move bey<strong>on</strong>d be<strong>in</strong>g merely adm<strong>in</strong>istrators (Boult<strong>on</strong> et al. 2009). Similarly, GEP-EDOREN – Educati<strong>on</strong> Data, Research and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria 130
- Page 1 and 2:
REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON BASICED
- Page 3 and 4:
Review of
- Page 5 and 6:
Review of
- Page 7 and 8:
Review of
- Page 9 and 10:
Review of
- Page 11 and 12:
Review of
- Page 13 and 14:
Review of
- Page 15 and 16:
Review of
- Page 17 and 18:
Review of
- Page 19 and 20:
Review of
- Page 21 and 22:
Review of
- Page 23 and 24:
Review of
- Page 25 and 26:
Review of
- Page 27 and 28:
Review of
- Page 29 and 30:
Review of
- Page 31 and 32:
Review of
- Page 33 and 34:
Review of
- Page 35 and 36:
Review of
- Page 37 and 38:
Review of
- Page 39 and 40:
Review of
- Page 41 and 42:
Review of
- Page 43 and 44:
Review of
- Page 45 and 46:
Review of
- Page 47 and 48:
Review of
- Page 49 and 50:
Review of
- Page 51 and 52:
Review of
- Page 53 and 54:
Review of
- Page 55 and 56:
Review of
- Page 57 and 58:
Review of
- Page 59 and 60:
Review of
- Page 61 and 62:
Review of
- Page 63 and 64:
Review of
- Page 65 and 66:
Review of
- Page 67 and 68:
Review of
- Page 69 and 70:
Review of
- Page 71 and 72:
Review of
- Page 73 and 74:
Review of
- Page 75 and 76:
Review of
- Page 77 and 78:
Review of
- Page 79 and 80:
Review of
- Page 81 and 82:
Review of
- Page 83 and 84:
Review of
- Page 85 and 86:
Review of
- Page 87 and 88:
Review of
- Page 89 and 90:
Review of
- Page 91 and 92:
Review of
- Page 93 and 94:
Review of
- Page 95 and 96:
Review of
- Page 97 and 98:
Review of
- Page 99 and 100:
Review of
- Page 101 and 102:
Review of
- Page 103 and 104:
Review of
- Page 105 and 106: Review of
- Page 107 and 108: Review of
- Page 109 and 110: Review of
- Page 111 and 112: Review of
- Page 113 and 114: Review of
- Page 115 and 116: Review of
- Page 117 and 118: Review of
- Page 119 and 120: Review of
- Page 121 and 122: Review of
- Page 123 and 124: Review of
- Page 125 and 126: Review of
- Page 127 and 128: Review of
- Page 129 and 130: Review of
- Page 131 and 132: Review of
- Page 133 and 134: Review of
- Page 135 and 136: Review of
- Page 137 and 138: Review of
- Page 139 and 140: Review of
- Page 141 and 142: Review of
- Page 143 and 144: Review of
- Page 145 and 146: Review of
- Page 147 and 148: Review of
- Page 149 and 150: Review of
- Page 151 and 152: Review of
- Page 153 and 154: Review of
- Page 155: Review of
- Page 159 and 160: Review of
- Page 161 and 162: Review of
- Page 163 and 164: Review of
- Page 165 and 166: Review of
- Page 167 and 168: Review of
- Page 169 and 170: Review of
- Page 171 and 172: Review of
- Page 173 and 174: Review of
- Page 175 and 176: Review of
- Page 177 and 178: Review of
- Page 179 and 180: Review of
- Page 181 and 182: Review of
- Page 183 and 184: Review of
- Page 185 and 186: Review of
- Page 187 and 188: Review of
- Page 189 and 190: Review of
- Page 191 and 192: Review of
- Page 193 and 194: Review of
- Page 195 and 196: Review of
- Page 197 and 198: Review of
- Page 199 and 200: Review of
- Page 201 and 202: Review of
- Page 203 and 204: Review of
- Page 205 and 206: Review of
- Page 207 and 208:
Review of
- Page 209 and 210:
Review of