Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria2.3 EnrolmentAs highlighted <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Introducti<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al primary school-age populati<strong>on</strong> is estimated at around 20milli<strong>on</strong> for those aged 5–9 and 16 milli<strong>on</strong> for those aged 10–14. For <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 5–9 age group, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> female-tomaleratio is 48% to 52% while for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 10–14 age group <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ratio is 47% to 53%. In all, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> primaryschool-age populati<strong>on</strong> (6–12) accounts for about 20% <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total nati<strong>on</strong>al populati<strong>on</strong> figure (FME2009a). However, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are no reliable age-specific data available to help determ<strong>in</strong>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> net enrolmentratio (NER) (FME 2005), although <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2008 NDHS gives estimati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> net attendance ratio (NAR)(see Secti<strong>on</strong> 2.4).The EMIS data shown <strong>in</strong> Table 2.1 suggest that nati<strong>on</strong>ally <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re has been an overall decl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>in</strong> enrolment<strong>in</strong> public primary schools between 2006 and 2010, except <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North West where <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> bothgirls and boys enrolled <strong>in</strong> school has risen and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> gender gap has narrowed. The <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> NorthWest might <strong>in</strong> part be attributable to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fact that several states <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> regi<strong>on</strong> have been <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> focus <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>recent development efforts (e.g. ESSPIN and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Girls’ Educati<strong>on</strong> Project (GEP)) aimed at improv<strong>in</strong>genrolments, especially <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> girls. C<strong>on</strong>versely, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> drop <strong>in</strong> enrolments <strong>in</strong> public primary schools <strong>in</strong> sou<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rnand central states might be due, at least <strong>in</strong> part, to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> migrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> some children to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> low-fee privatesector <strong>in</strong> urban areas, as reported <strong>in</strong> a number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> studies (e.g. Urwick 2002; Larbi et al. 2004; Tooley etal. 2005; Härmä 2011 a, b and c; see also Secti<strong>on</strong> 7.3).Table 2.1 Pupil enrolment* <strong>in</strong> public primary schools 2006/07 to 2009/102006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10Z<strong>on</strong>e F M Total F M Total F M Total F M TotalNorth WestNorth EastNorth Central**South WestSouth South***South EastTotal1.91(39.7)1.41(42.1)1.78(47.0)1.71(50.6)1.54(50.4)1.02(49.6)9.38(45.2)2.91(60.3)1.94(57.9)2.01(53.0)1.67(49.4)1.52(49.6)1.04(50.4)11.09(54.2)4.83(100)3.35(100)3.80(100)3.38(100)3.06(100)2.06(100)20.47(100)2.00(40.5)1.29(43.3)1.70(46.8)1.49(50.6)1.22(36.5)1.12(49.4)8.81(43.9)2.94(59.5)1.69(56.7)1.93(53.2)1.45(49.4)2.12(63.5)1.14(50.6)15.22(56.1)4.94(100)2.97(100)3.63(100)2.94(100)3.34(100)2.26(100)20.08(100)2.23(41.8)1.35(41.7)1.46(47.7)1.32(50.7)1.24(50.8)1.06(49.7)8.67(46.04)3.10(59.2)1.90(58.3)1.60(52.3)1.28(49.3)1.20(49.2)1.08(50.3)10.16(55.06)5.33(100)3.25(100)3.06**(100)2.60(100)2.44***(100)2.14(100)18.82(100)2.67(43.5)1.41(44.1)1.47(46.6)1.41(50.5)1.04(50.3)0.83(49.2)8.83(46.35)3.47(56.5)1.79(55.9)1.69(53.4)1.38(49.5)1.03(49.7)0.86(50.8)10.22(53.65)6.14(100)3.20(100)3.16**(100)2.79(100)2.07(100)1.69(100)19.04(100)* Numbers <strong>in</strong> milli<strong>on</strong>s.** Numbers miss<strong>in</strong>g from North Central for Benue, Nasarawa and Plateau states for 2008/09 and Plateau State for 2009/10.*** Numbers miss<strong>in</strong>g from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> South South for 2008/09 from Bayalesa and Edo states.Note: Numbers may not add up perfectly due to round<strong>in</strong>g.Source: FME (2011b)An alternative explanati<strong>on</strong> might relate to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> general unreliability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> data, ei<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r current orprevious. The absence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> data for several states <strong>in</strong> 2008/09 would expla<strong>in</strong>, at least <strong>in</strong> part, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> huge drop<strong>in</strong> enrolments <strong>in</strong> 2008/09, for example.One fairly c<strong>on</strong>sistent gender pattern is that more girls than boys attend public primary school <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>South West and South South; <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se gender ratios have rema<strong>in</strong>ed fairly steady across <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> four-yearperiod while <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> South East <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are <strong>on</strong>ly slightly more boys than girls <strong>in</strong> enrolled <strong>in</strong> public primaryschools.EDOREN – Educati<strong>on</strong> Data, Research and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria 11
Review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>literature</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong> <strong>basic</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria2.3.1 Transiti<strong>on</strong> to JSSIn c<strong>on</strong>trast, as Table 2.2 shows, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re has been a steady <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> enrolment at government JSSsacross <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same four-year period, from almost 3 milli<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2006/07 to over 4 milli<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> 2009/10.Table 2.2 Pupil enrolment* <strong>in</strong> public junior sec<strong>on</strong>dary schools, 2006–2010Z<strong>on</strong>e 2006/07 2007/08 2008/09 2009/10F M Total F M Total F M Total F M TotalNorth West197.4(30.8)443. 5(69.2)640.9(100)227.1(33.9)443.2(66.1)670.3(100)249.1(32.9)508.9(67.1)758.0(100)309.8(34.8)580.7(65.2)890.5(100)North East148.4(41.2)211.5(58.8)359.9(100)153.4(38.6)243.0(61.4)396.4(100)180.6(36.7)310.9(63.3)491.5(100)167.1(37.4)280.1(62.6)447.2(100)NorthCentral*219.1(41.7)306.3(58.3)525.4(100)180.8(42)249.9(58)430.7(100)172.3(41.5)243.4(58.5)415.7**(100)262.9(42.7)352.5(57.3)615.4**(100)South West377.3(49.8)380.7(50.2)758.0(100)483.5(49.8)487.6(50.2)971.1(100)522.0(49.7)528.8(50.3)1,050.8(100)526.4(50.7)511.1(49.3)1,037.5(100)SouthSouth***175.0(50.3)170.4(49.3)345.4(100)219.1(50.3)216.1(49.7)435.2(100)–– –– – ***290.6(51)279.6(49)570.2(100)South East178.6(52.5)161.8(47.5)340.4(100)287.2(52.6)259.2(47.4)546.4(100)315.7(53.2)277.3(46.8)593.0(100)307.8(52.7)276.5(47.3)584.3(100)Total1,296.1(43.6)1,674.0(56.4)2,969.9(100)1,551.3(44.9)1,899.0(56.1)3,451.1(100)1,599.9(45.7)2,023.4(54.3)3,309.0***(100)1,864.9(45.2)2,280.6(54.8)4,165.2(100)* Numbers <strong>in</strong> thousands** Numbers miss<strong>in</strong>g from North Central for Plateau State for 2008/09 and 2009/10.*** Data unusable from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> South South <strong>in</strong> 2008/09 as <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re was an obvious <strong>in</strong>put error for Rivers State and <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> totals did notadd up.Note: Numbers for females and males may not add up perfectly due to round<strong>in</strong>g.Source: FME (2011b)This <strong>in</strong>crease is c<strong>on</strong>sistent with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> fall <strong>in</strong> dropout rates from Primary 6 reported by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> NEDS between2004 and 2010, mean<strong>in</strong>g that more children are mak<strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> transiti<strong>on</strong> from primary school to JSS (NPCand ICF Macro 2009; NPC and RTI Internati<strong>on</strong>al 2011), and is likely to be l<strong>in</strong>ked to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> steady <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong>government provisi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> JSS, from around 8,200 schools <strong>in</strong> 2005/06 to almost 12,700 <strong>in</strong> 2008/09 (FME2011b). This <strong>in</strong>crease occurs even <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sou<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn z<strong>on</strong>es, and may be expla<strong>in</strong>ed by pupils re-jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>government sector after attend<strong>in</strong>g private primary schools. The drop <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> overall enrolment total <strong>in</strong>2008/09 is expla<strong>in</strong>ed by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> usable data for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> South South. Overall, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> gender gap hasdecreased, although a significantly higher proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> boys are study<strong>in</strong>g at JSS than girls, with a muchhigher proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> girls study<strong>in</strong>g at this level <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> south than <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> north.Table 2.3 compares <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> actual transiti<strong>on</strong> rates for girls and boys for 2006/07 with those for 2009/10,which c<strong>on</strong>firms <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> overall improvement <strong>in</strong> transiti<strong>on</strong> rates nati<strong>on</strong>ally and across <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> z<strong>on</strong>es, except <strong>in</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> North West, which has rema<strong>in</strong>ed steady. The z<strong>on</strong>al averages, however, mask c<strong>on</strong>siderabledifferences am<strong>on</strong>g states, although some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> extreme differences <strong>in</strong> rates raise questi<strong>on</strong>s about <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>reliability <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> data. The strik<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> transiti<strong>on</strong> rates <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> South West is <strong>in</strong>flated bytransiti<strong>on</strong> rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> well over 100% for Lagos, Ekiti and Ogun states <strong>in</strong> 2009/10, which, as highlightedabove, suggest a large <strong>in</strong>flux back <strong>in</strong>to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> public sector from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> mushroom<strong>in</strong>g larger private primarysector <strong>in</strong> those states (see Härmä 2011 a, b and c; see also Secti<strong>on</strong> 7.3). This <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore gives us less <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an<strong>in</strong>dicati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Primary 6 pupils <strong>in</strong> public schools that move <strong>on</strong> to JSS. The equallystrik<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> transiti<strong>on</strong> rate am<strong>on</strong>g girls <strong>in</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> South South is due to improbably hightransiti<strong>on</strong> rates <strong>in</strong> Akwa Ibom and Edo states.EDOREN – Educati<strong>on</strong> Data, Research and Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <strong>in</strong> Nigeria 12
- Page 1 and 2: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON BASICED
- Page 3 and 4: Review of
- Page 5 and 6: Review of
- Page 7 and 8: Review of
- Page 9 and 10: Review of
- Page 11 and 12: Review of
- Page 13 and 14: Review of
- Page 15 and 16: Review of
- Page 17 and 18: Review of
- Page 19 and 20: Review of
- Page 21 and 22: Review of
- Page 23 and 24: Review of
- Page 25 and 26: Review of
- Page 27 and 28: Review of
- Page 29 and 30: Review of
- Page 31 and 32: Review of
- Page 33 and 34: Review of
- Page 35 and 36: Review of
- Page 37: Review of
- Page 41 and 42: Review of
- Page 43 and 44: Review of
- Page 45 and 46: Review of
- Page 47 and 48: Review of
- Page 49 and 50: Review of
- Page 51 and 52: Review of
- Page 53 and 54: Review of
- Page 55 and 56: Review of
- Page 57 and 58: Review of
- Page 59 and 60: Review of
- Page 61 and 62: Review of
- Page 63 and 64: Review of
- Page 65 and 66: Review of
- Page 67 and 68: Review of
- Page 69 and 70: Review of
- Page 71 and 72: Review of
- Page 73 and 74: Review of
- Page 75 and 76: Review of
- Page 77 and 78: Review of
- Page 79 and 80: Review of
- Page 81 and 82: Review of
- Page 83 and 84: Review of
- Page 85 and 86: Review of
- Page 87 and 88: Review of
- Page 89 and 90:
Review of
- Page 91 and 92:
Review of
- Page 93 and 94:
Review of
- Page 95 and 96:
Review of
- Page 97 and 98:
Review of
- Page 99 and 100:
Review of
- Page 101 and 102:
Review of
- Page 103 and 104:
Review of
- Page 105 and 106:
Review of
- Page 107 and 108:
Review of
- Page 109 and 110:
Review of
- Page 111 and 112:
Review of
- Page 113 and 114:
Review of
- Page 115 and 116:
Review of
- Page 117 and 118:
Review of
- Page 119 and 120:
Review of
- Page 121 and 122:
Review of
- Page 123 and 124:
Review of
- Page 125 and 126:
Review of
- Page 127 and 128:
Review of
- Page 129 and 130:
Review of
- Page 131 and 132:
Review of
- Page 133 and 134:
Review of
- Page 135 and 136:
Review of
- Page 137 and 138:
Review of
- Page 139 and 140:
Review of
- Page 141 and 142:
Review of
- Page 143 and 144:
Review of
- Page 145 and 146:
Review of
- Page 147 and 148:
Review of
- Page 149 and 150:
Review of
- Page 151 and 152:
Review of
- Page 153 and 154:
Review of
- Page 155 and 156:
Review of
- Page 157 and 158:
Review of
- Page 159 and 160:
Review of
- Page 161 and 162:
Review of
- Page 163 and 164:
Review of
- Page 165 and 166:
Review of
- Page 167 and 168:
Review of
- Page 169 and 170:
Review of
- Page 171 and 172:
Review of
- Page 173 and 174:
Review of
- Page 175 and 176:
Review of
- Page 177 and 178:
Review of
- Page 179 and 180:
Review of
- Page 181 and 182:
Review of
- Page 183 and 184:
Review of
- Page 185 and 186:
Review of
- Page 187 and 188:
Review of
- Page 189 and 190:
Review of
- Page 191 and 192:
Review of
- Page 193 and 194:
Review of
- Page 195 and 196:
Review of
- Page 197 and 198:
Review of
- Page 199 and 200:
Review of
- Page 201 and 202:
Review of
- Page 203 and 204:
Review of
- Page 205 and 206:
Review of
- Page 207 and 208:
Review of
- Page 209 and 210:
Review of