09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

pulverized George Foreman had they fought when <strong>Jerry</strong> was still in his late 20's.<br />

<strong>Jerry</strong> never had problems with big sluggers (although I remember his getting<br />

nailed with one big Mac Foster right hand a bit before kayoing Foster). <strong>Jerry</strong><br />

walked through slow sluggers like Ron Lyle, Mac Foster, and Earnie Shavers. And<br />

pounded the stuffing out of a big fast puncher, Buster Mathis. <strong>Jerry</strong> turned out<br />

to be everything that Gerry Cooney wasn't. His tendency to cut is what cost him<br />

just about every fight.I have many fond memories of <strong>Jerry</strong>. Vastly<br />

underrated in the big picture of heavyweight boxing.|<br />

|12/5/02 02:55:14 AM|Evren|London||@||||10|George was NOT just a big slugger !|<br />

|12/5/02 09:02:01 AM|John Gerard|NYC||rock289z@yahoo.com||||10|George was a<br />

great one, <strong>Jerry</strong> was a very,very good one. George would have won.|<br />

|12/5/02 12:12:29 PM|JIMMY DORSEY|Ventura<br />

California||RONNYRAINS@YAHOO.COM||||10|I have to agree on one thing, BIG GEORGE<br />

would have definetly been favored, about 12-5 odds,Seemed like he had a little<br />

"extra" from the punchers that were mentioned, I still say the Lyle bout was the<br />

most exciting ever,at a cookout of that FOREMAN-LYLE BOUT, in the SAN JOAQUIN<br />

VALLEY,CA.Even the ladies were into that crazy bout, and betting!!!I SURE wished<br />

JERRY AND GEORGE WOULD HAVE GOT IT ON IN 1974! It would have answered all the 30<br />

years of questions,I wouldn't have minded Bonavena getting in there with BIG<br />

GEORGE.Besides i would have liked to see <strong>Jerry</strong> in there with GEORGE FOREMAN,<br />

rather than FRAZIER,Anyone who saw JOE INTERVIEWED BEFORE HE WENT IN THE RING<br />

WITH JERRY QUARRY KNEW HE WAS GOING TO DEFINETLY WIN THAT NIGHT,TAKE CARE!|<br />

|12/5/02 01:17:21 PM|Mark Sargeant|UK||lpu00mts@reading.ac.uk||||10|<strong>Jerry</strong> was an<br />

excellent fighter and a wonderful asset to boxing during its toughest era.<br />

However, to say he would beat George really is going a bit over the top. Foreman<br />

was desperately formidable and with <strong>Jerry</strong>'s cuts and slight inconsistency,<br />

alongside Foreman's power, I really do think that there could only be one<br />

winner. <strong>Jerry</strong> at his best would have given him one hell of a fight but it simply<br />

wouldn't be enough-similar to Frazier. Outside Ali and Louis, Foreman, Frazier,<br />

Holmes make up the next category, with the likes of Holyfield, Norton, Tyson,<br />

Lewis, Bowe, Walcott, Marciano , Charles. I would put <strong>Jerry</strong> in this group along<br />

with a few others which is one hell of a complement to a tremendous fighter-but<br />

he simply was not in a higher one with George.|<br />

|12/5/02 01:46:54 PM|Steve|N.J.||dmmsrm@comcast.net||||10|Jimmie D.,I won 25.00<br />

on the <strong>Quarry</strong> vs Lyle fight.I've mentioned before that I thought it was my<br />

alltime favorite fight.You say you saw it during the day.I remember watching it<br />

at night.It must be the time zone difference between Cal. and N.J.Based on that<br />

fight,I allways thought the same caliber of perfomance from <strong>Jerry</strong> would have at<br />

least gotten him a decision over Forman.I remember Mike Nixon very well.He was a<br />

very muscular,strong fighter,but I saw him get knocked by two fighters,weirdly<br />

enough,both named Davis.<strong>The</strong> one,I think his name was Indian Red Davis,knocked<br />

Mike out twice!! I believe these fights where shown here out of New York.I can<br />

remember getting real frustrated with Mike,since in both fights he was beating<br />

the heck out of Davis,and then goy caught,and KO'D. |<br />

|12/5/02 05:33:50 PM|Jeffery Smith|New Orleans||jls@runbox.com||||6|Nixon's foes<br />

were Art Davis and Indian George Davis, as I remember. Back to Foreman, anyone<br />

who saw his fight with Lyle knows that he was slow, and that he could be<br />

counterpunched. Frazier was not a counterpuncher, and his style did not work<br />

well against Foreman. Lyle lost a lopsided decision to <strong>Quarry</strong> when he was a few<br />

years younger than when he floored Foreman twice. Lyle's problem was that he was<br />

so muscle-bound, he couldn't hold his arms up after 20 seconds of trying to<br />

finish a guy off. <strong>Jerry</strong> was a good finisher who didn't waste a lot of<br />

haymakers.Keep in mind that, in the Lyle fight, Foreman tried (for the<br />

first time) a left jab and a straight right in hopes of getting his punches home<br />

a bit faster. Didn't work at all, so he stopped doing it. I think <strong>Jerry</strong> would<br />

have beat him to the punch.George Foreman was much more than a slugger?<br />

Not in the fights I saw. No jabbing, no counterpunching, no leg movement, no

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!