09.12.2012 Views

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

January 2002 - March 2004 - The Jerry Quarry Foundation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

valid and seems very much bitter towards the game since seeing his heroes<br />

ravaged by brain damage.I have read about Joe Louis' drug habit from several<br />

sources, one being from the Liston biography by Nick Tosches. That journalistic<br />

piece went as far as to say that Louis introduced Sonny to drugs which led to<br />

his eventual demise. Whether this is true is subject to debate. Boxers are<br />

victims of boxing with very few making out with all faculties in tact. <strong>The</strong> only<br />

way to fully protect them would be to ban the game. This of course will not<br />

happen. All boxers know the risks so, I guess the cause of their injuries lie<br />

with themselves. <strong>The</strong>y are victims of their own 'habit'.|<br />

|1/19/03 06:51:21 PM|Kent|La Habra, Ca||oriononside@aol.com||||10|Evren, yes the<br />

only way we can eliminate boxers from getting permanently injured in the ring<br />

would be if boxing matches never happen again. But this is not going to happen.<br />

If boxing were banned, then it would go underground and these illegal matches<br />

would put the contestants at even greater risk as there would be no regulation<br />

of the sport. American football, rugby, and similar sports also cause a lot of<br />

permanent head trauma. Does that mean these sports should be banned also? This<br />

is one of the times where James <strong>Quarry</strong> is sorely missed as he had some good<br />

insight on the very subjects we are discussing now. <strong>The</strong> choice we have is to<br />

sit and do nothing to improve boxing or we can do the best we can to try and<br />

limit injuries as much as possible. Since boxing is not going away, then I<br />

choose the second course of action over inaction. Forest may not believe this,<br />

but I am glad he posted here as he made things a little more lively here again.|<br />

|1/19/03 07:02:05 PM|Evren|London||@||||10|<strong>The</strong>re has been some positive measures<br />

to improve safety in boxing in recent years. This may help but you can't guage<br />

long term affects by rules that are being administered now. Boxers still take<br />

punches to the head day in and day out. <strong>The</strong> intention of a boxer is to strike<br />

the opponent about the body or head to inflict damage.This is where it seperates<br />

itself from other sports.I love boxing and am the biggest fan but I guess hide<br />

myself from the real dangers. I don't have to take the punches or bleed like<br />

they do. That the boxers are doing this sport voluntarily makes me bear it. It<br />

is barbaric but it is the boxers choice to duel. <strong>The</strong>re are both sides to this<br />

argument but as long as there are boxers and money the game will go on. We can<br />

only try to improve on making retirment and health funds for ex boxers.|<br />

|1/20/03 04:12:26 PM|Steve|nj||dmmsrm@comcast.net||||10|Hi,Evren,why don't you<br />

consider using your organizational and motivational skills in starting a new<br />

tourniment for the alltime greatist Lightheavyweight and or middleweight<br />

fighters,including crossovers!You did a great job on the heavywieght<br />

tourniment!<strong>The</strong>re are surely enough candidates over the years to come up with<br />

alot of dream fights!Charles Anderson,you keep asking about a book on "<strong>The</strong><br />

<strong>Quarry</strong>'s", and , believe me ,I share your interest.I now am aware of at least<br />

two, and possibly three people ,who are interested in developing a story.Kent,I<br />

disagree with your assessment of Norton's statements and attitude towards <strong>Jerry</strong><br />

<strong>Quarry</strong> in his book,"Going <strong>The</strong> Distance"Basically,Norton said he was concerned<br />

that he had caused some of the damage <strong>Jerry</strong> suffered! Based on some of his later<br />

comments in his book,this sounds distinctly like gloating.He qualifies his brief<br />

sense of guilt by saying that it could just as easily have been himself who<br />

suffer from the damage.Once again,however, He fails to mention that <strong>Quarry</strong> was<br />

only carefully selected as an opponent after the fearful,career ending beating<br />

He took at the hands of Joe Frazier only a few months earlier.<strong>Quarry</strong> at that<br />

time was a shot fighter,He was ripe for a beating ,and Norton's people knew<br />

it.In his book,Norton states'I freely admit that I did not like <strong>Quarry</strong>."<strong>Quarry</strong><br />

was the only man whom I fought in anger.""I went in to punish him." "I wanted<br />

<strong>Quarry</strong> to be carried out on a stretcher."My point is ,<strong>Quarry</strong>, who by all<br />

accounts I have heard,was a pretty nice guy , seems to have been hand picked ,an<br />

acknowleged shot fighter,to be a whipping boy for Norton.I guess Norton' hard<br />

feelings for <strong>Quarry</strong> did disapate after he nearly killed him in the ring.Norton<br />

still comes of to me as a guy who,in that fight with Forman,was looking for a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!